Superior General of all Religious Communities must ask Archbishop Roche to interpret Vatican Counclil II with the Rational Premise : the present interpretation is immoral

 

https://www.canons-regular.org/post/regarding-the-motu-proprio-traditionis-custodes

Archbishop Roche is using the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and all the Ecclesia Dei communities and also the communities who offer/attend the Novus Ordo Mass should reject it and ask him to use the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and affirm the traditional conclusions.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 25, 2021

How can the Fraternity of St.Vincent Ferrer follow Archbishop Roche who speaks about ‘ a new Magisterium’ with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise ?

The  Superior-General, Father Louis-Marie de Blignières, of the Fraternity of Saint Vincent Ferrer also needs to clarify that they will only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise  and not False Premise, They will not follow Pope France, Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Roche when they use the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a false break with Tradition.

How can the Fraternity of St.Vincent Ferrer follow Archbishop Roche who speaks about ‘ a new Magisterium’ with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise ?.He produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition by confusing what is invisible (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16) as being visible (practical exceptions for EENS which is made obosolete.).-Lionel Andrades

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2021/12/important-declaration-of-superior-of.html

_______________________

DECEMBER 24, 2021

Archbishop Roche is choosing the hermenetic of rupture with tradition and apostolic times.He has altered the faith.

 However, let me clarify one important matter. The liturgy is never simply a matter of personal tastes or preferences. It is the lex orandi of the Church, which in faithfulness to the tradition received from Apostolic times, is determined by the Church and not by individual members. The Roman Missal of the saintly Popes, Paul VI and John Paul II, is witness to an unaltered faith and uninterrupted and living tradition. - Archbishop Roche on ‘Traditionis Custodes’ and Its Guidelines: ‘The Liturgical Possibilities Are in Place’

https://www.ncregister.com/interview/archbishop-roche-on-traditionis-custodes-and-its-guidelines-the-liturgical-possibilities-are-in-place

,

Like a switch - we can turn the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition on or off.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has pressed the button. He says there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14). He has kept the switch on. Vatican Council II has a continuity with Tradition.

Pope Francis' New Theology keeps the switch off. Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism of desire) refers to known and visible non Catholics. He infers that invisible people are visible for him and are examples of salvation outside the Church. So he concludes that EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete. There is a cut off with the past.

For me Unitatis Redintigratio (imperfect communion with the Church) refers to only a hypothetical case. So UR (Decree on Ecumenism) nowhere contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENS. I have kept the line open with Tradition. Cardinal Walter Kasper's New Ecumenism is based upon UR 3 being an exception for the Syllabus and EENS. He has turned the switch off, breaking the connection with Sacred Tradition and the past exclusivist ecumenism. The premise was his handle Archbishop Roche has used the false premise and has broken faithfulness to tradition received from apostolic times. He has chosen to keep 'the switch' off and has altered the faith and interrupted the living tradition.-Lionel Andrades

Medjugorje Chiesa di San Giacomo - Natale 2021

How can the Fraternity of St.Vincent Ferrer follow Archbishop Roche who speaks about ‘ a new Magisterium’ with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise ?

The  Superior-General, Father Louis-Marie de Blignières, of the Fraternity of Saint Vincent Ferrer also needs to clarify that they will only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise  and not False Premise, They will not follow Pope France, Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Roche when they use the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a false break with Tradition.

How can the Fraternity of St.Vincent Ferrer follow Archbishop Roche who speaks about ‘ a new Magisterium’ with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise ?.He produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition by confusing what is invisible (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16) as being visible (practical exceptions for EENS which is made obosolete.).-Lionel Andrades

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2021/12/important-declaration-of-superior-of.html

Happy Christmas

 A Happy Christmas to all readers in the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846,1257 etc) - but also a Happy Christmas to all Christians all over the world, who love Our Lord and follow Him and will discover the Sacraments. 

Lionel