Tuesday, August 14, 2018
New York launches public awareness campaign to promote abortion, ‘fight back’ against Trump
ALBANY, New York, August 8, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – No longer content to preside over some of the most permissive abortion laws in the nation, New York Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo has announced a new “public awareness” campaign to promote abortion centers and counter what he calls pro-life “misinformation.”
The campaign is called “Know Your Options,” according to a press release from the governor’s office, and it consists of subway ads encouraging women to visit a state website that purports to help them “get the facts” and connect to “comprehensive family planning services.”
“These actions are in direct response to widespread reports of organizations known as Crisis Pregnancy Centers or CPCs misrepresenting themselves as health centers to dissuade those seeking abortion from going through with that choice,” the announcement claims. “These reports show that CPCs often use false and misleading advertising and offer free services to attract women into their offices, where they then allegedly misinform and mislead those who seek pregnancy-related information.”
The press release does not cite any of these “widespread reports,” though abortion defenders have attacked CPCs for years. Pro-lifers have addressed such claims at length.
"While the federal government wages war on women's reproductive rights, New York will fight back to protect women's access to comprehensive, safe and affordable health care," Cuomo declared. "In New York, we refuse to let President Trump and Washington take us backwards and jeopardize the rights of New Yorkers. We are launching this public awareness campaign to combat the insidious spread of misleading, medically inaccurate information about reproductive health and to ensure all New York women know the options they are legally entitled to."
The website helps visitors look up health plans and licensed providers in the state, as well as New York’s health programs for low-income women. The latter provide“contraceptive (birth control) education, counseling and a broad range of methods (including long-acting reversible contraception such as IUDs and implants)” and “health education in community settings to [...] promote access to reproductive and preventive health services,” as well as less controversial services.
The “Think You Might Be Pregnant?” section directs viewers to resources on prenatal care, parenting support, New York adoption services, and abortion. In-clinic abortions “are safe, outpatient procedures,” the website claims, while medication abortions entail “giv[ing] you medicine at an office visit and then allow[ing] you to go home with more medicine to end the pregnancy.”
“Insurance, including Medicaid, covers abortion services so that cost is not a barrier,” it continues.
In an implicit swipe at CPCs, the website stresses that women should make sure they are turning to “Quality Family Planning Providers,” who offer information “without pressure or bias,” provide the “most up to date scientifically-proven reproductive health services available,” and are “licensed to provide services in NYS and be able to tell you what kind of license they have.”
Abortion advocates often claim that CPCs misrepresent themselves as medical facilities despite not being licensed. Pro-life activist and former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson has responded by noting that leading CPC groups Heartbeat International and Care Net do recommend that CPCs which offer ultrasounds or lab tests employ licensed medical professionals, whereas Planned Parenthood does not require licensing for its own workers performing those functions.
In addition to disputing the various pro-abortion claims against CPCs, pro-lifers argue that many of these attacks could be more accurately directed at Planned Parenthood and other abortion centers, from lack of options and poor health standards to false information and pressure to choose abortion.
Cuomo’s latest move to promote abortion is part of a long record of pro-abortion advocacy, which includes permitting abortion effectively until birth, forcing taxpayers and insurance companies to pay for abortion, a largely-symbolic push to codify Roe v. Wade in state law, and declaring that “right-to-life” supporters “have no place in the state of New York.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/andrew-cuomo-launches-state-website-ad-blitz-to-promote-abortion-in-new-yor
_______________________
MAY 25, 2018
British politician says 190,000 abortions in England in 2016 source of great sadness
There were 190,000 abortions in England in 2016 says the British politician Jacob Rees-Mogg and this is a source of great sadness for him.It is one of the great tragedies of the modern world.-L.A
Images of aborted babies from SPUC, England.
https://www.spuc.org.uk/abortion/methods/reality/graphic-images
_________________________
Learn how to make a poster
Repost : Pope Pius XII, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria were wrong and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct : apology from CDF long over due
FEBRUARY 12, 2018
Pope Pius XII, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria were wrong and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct : apology from CDF long over due
The popes since Pius XII made a factual error and this error is used to interpret Vatican Council II.Without this error Vatican Council II is in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS ), which Catholics are not aware of or do not want to proclaim.
Pope Pius XII did not defend Fr.Leonard Feeney.This was about the time of the creation of the State of Israel.He did not announce that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood)BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to theoretical and hypothetical cases only and they could not be known examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.
However in March 2016(Avvenire) Pope Benedict XVI informed all that there is known salvation outside the Church and questioned the need for mission.So like Cardinal Richard Cushing, the former liberal Archbishop of Boston, Pope Benedict was saying that there was salvation outside the Church , for him.
He was honest to call it 'a development' and mentiioned that this development was not there in the 16th century.He refused to affirm EENS and Vatican Council II without this innovation.
Also in 1997 in Christianity and the World Religions(International Theological Commission, Vatican) he inferred that there was known salvation outside the Church.So he concluded, with Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j, the then President of ITC and now Cardinal-Prefect of the CDF, that Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong and Pope Pius XII was correct.
66. In his encyclical Mystici Corporis, Pius XII addresses the question, How are those who attain salvation outside visible communion with the Church related to her? He says that they are oriented to the mystical body of Christ by a yearning and desire of which they are not aware (DS 3821).( Lionel: And this is an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus for Ratzinger and Ladaria ) -Christianity and the World Religions 2007
66. The opposition of the American Jesuit Leonard Feeney, who insisted on the exclusivist interpretation of the expression extra ecclesiam nulla solus, afforded the occasion for the letter of the Holy Office, dated 8 August ,1949, to the archbishop of Boston, which rejected Feeney s interpretation and clarified the teaching of Pius XII.
-Christianity and the World Religions 2007
International Theological Commission (ITC)
10. Exclusivist ecclesiocentrism—the fruit of a specific theological system or of a mistaken understanding of the phrase extra ecclesiam nulla salus—is no longer defended by Catholic theologians after the clear statements of Pius XII and Vatican Council II on the possibility of salvation for those who do not belong visibly to the Church (cf, e.g., LG 16; GS 22).-International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions 1997.
International Theological Commission (ITC)
62. It is not possible to develop a theology of the religions without taking into account the universal salvific mission of the Church, attested to by Holy Scripture and by the tradition of faith of the Church. A theological evaluation of the religions was impeded over a long time because of the principle extra ecclesiam nulla salus, understood in an exclusivist sense.(Lionel: Now it is not!) With the doctrine about the Church as the universal sacrament of salvation or the sacrament of the kingdom of God, theology seeks to respond to the new way of posing the problem. This teaching, which was also welcomed by Vatican Council II (Lionel: Interpreted with the false premise) , is linked to the sacramental vision of the Church in the New Testament.-Christianity and the World Religions (2007. ITC).International Theological Commission (ITC)
66. In his encyclical Mystici Corporis, Pius XII addresses the question, How are those who attain salvation outside visible communion with the Church related to her? He says that they are oriented to the mystical body of Christ by a yearning and desire of which they are not aware (DS 3821).( Lionel: And this is an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus for Ratzinger and Ladaria ) -Christianity and the World Religions 2007
66. The opposition of the American Jesuit Leonard Feeney, who insisted on the exclusivist interpretation of the expression extra ecclesiam nulla solus, afforded the occasion for the letter of the Holy Office, dated 8 August ,1949, to the archbishop of Boston, which rejected Feeney s interpretation and clarified the teaching of Pius XII.
-Christianity and the World Religions 2007
We now know that invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I never ever were visible,objective exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century or to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
So the popes Pius XII and Benedict XVI were wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. They were irrational, non traditional and heretical while Fr. Leonard Feeney was repeating Catholic orthodoxy.
So the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) today needs to apologize for the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney and admit that doctrinally the Magisterium was wrong and the priest from Boston was correct.
This also has a doctrinal bearing today on how the SSPX in particular and Catholics in general interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.
The Council is not a rupture with the traditional interpretation of EENS if the Pius XII, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria irrationality is avoided.
-Lionel Andrades
Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
NO NEED FOR ‘SECRET TALKS’ ANYMORE: WE KNOW THE HERETICAL POSITION OF THE VATICAN NEGOTIATORS
BISHOP CHARLES MOREROD O.P IN BLATANT HERESY IS TO SPEAK BEFORE THE POPE ON ANGLICAN RELATIONS
VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO
The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS
VATICAN COUNCIL II(Feeneyite) REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS
Baptism-‘necessity of means or precept’-you wouldn’t know the difference, so why mention it ?
SSPX WEBSITE: ' I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins’ ?
Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger, FSSP, Joseph Fenton seem unaware that the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma
Traditionalists not welcome in Catholic churches: they first have to accept the doctrine of the dead-saved are physially visible to us and then adapt this new doctrine to Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/traditionalists-not-welcome-in-catholic.html#links________________________________________
International Theological Commission (ITC)
58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage: “salus extra ecclesiam non est”,[88] the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized. The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood. On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord”-The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized(2007. International Theological Commission) Fr.Luiz Ladaria S.j was the Secretary General of the ITC in 2007.He is now the Prefect of the CDF. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_index-doc-pubbl_en.html
International Theological Commission
59. The Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) offers further specifications. “To gain eternal salvation, it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality (reapse) as a member of the Church, but it is necessary that one belong to it at least in desire and longing (voto et desiderio). It is not always necessary that this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens.The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptized
AUGUST 26, 2012
International Theological Commission papers are full of ‘non-sense’ since we don’t know anyone saved with the baptism of desire: Priests who protest against the ITC could be suspended
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/international-theological-commission.html
______________________________________
Repost : Vatican(CDF) and Jesuits review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case : How could invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance be visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS?: The Magisterium made a mistake
FEBRUARY 12, 2018
Vatican(CDF) and Jesuits review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case : How could invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance be visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS?: The Magisterium made a mistake
NOVEMBER 16, 2011
JESUIT SUPERIOR GENERAL REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE :THERE IS NO KNOWN CASE OF A PERSON SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE WHICH IS VISIBLE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/11/jesuit-superior-general-review.html
How can invisible people in 2018 be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
JULY 24, 2017
Jesuit Superior General does not say with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) Catholic Church says all Buddhists on the way to Hell
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/with-jesuit-superior-does-not-say-with.html
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake.Similarly mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) relative to the traditional teaching on salvation was superfluous.It was a mistake to mention it in Lumen Gentium 16 which Julie has quoted in her blog post on Outside the Church there is no salvation.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.Austin Invereigh like most Catholkics today intepret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So Lumen Gentium 16 being physically visible and personally known would be an exception to the dogma EENS, it would be a rupture with Tradition
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.Austin Invereigh like most Catholkics today intepret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So Lumen Gentium 16 being physically visible and personally known would be an exception to the dogma EENS, it would be a rupture with Tradition
APRIL 8, 2015
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/until-today-jesuits-use-irrational.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
VATICAN REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/vatican-review-frleonard-feeney-case.html
Repost : VATICAN REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
VATICAN REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE
NOVEMBER 16, 2011
JESUIT SUPERIOR GENERAL REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE :THERE IS NO KNOWN CASE OF A PERSON SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE WHICH IS VISIBLE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/11/jesuit-superior-general-review.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : That an error was made in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case it was known for a long time: Even the SSPX communique supports the priest from Boston
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/they-have-rejected-eens-changed-nicene.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : If you consider the Holy Office or Fr.Leonard Feeney in heresy determines how you interpret Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-if-you-consider-holy-office-or.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : Were the excommunications of Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney leftist excommunications?: their fault was orthodoxy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-were-excommunications-of.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are not exceptions to EENS : Fr.Leonard Feeney's excommunication was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-lg16-lg-14-lg-8-ur-3-na-2-etc.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : JESUITS OPEN THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-jesuits-open-frleonard-feeney.html
FEBRUARY 11, 2018
Repost : Pope Francis, Jesuits review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/repost-pope-francis-jesuits-review.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
