Wednesday, February 14, 2018

4- To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949


June 21, 2014
Catholic Religious indicate the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a factual mistake :implicit desire etc is not visible to us
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-indicate-letter-of.html
  
June 17, 2014
At one of the two times, the magisterium has to be wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/at-one-of-two-times-magisterium-has-to.html
June 10, 2014

Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake on two points : The Letter of the Holy Office and Nostra Aetate etc

Cardinal Ratzinger never corrected him
June 26, 2014
I talk in terms of visible and invisible only because Catholics in general are unaware that they are using these terms
Catholic Religious communities who say the dead- saved are physically visible to them on earth are given churches and religious facilities to manage http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/progessivists-conduct-first-holy.html

February 5, 2013


If the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 implied that the dead are physically visible then it is an error : Religious Education in Rome
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/if-letter-of-holy-office-1949-implied.html

September 17, 2012

NEW AMERICAN ENCYCLOPEDIA MAKES AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/if-letter-of-holy-office-1949-implied.html

The ambiguity in Vatican Council II comes from assuming that the dead are visible and it is traced to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/the-ambiguity-in-vatican-council-ii.html#links



June 1, 2012
Is the Catholic Church ecclesiocentric SSPX? It cannot be ecclesiocentric if those saved with the baptism of desire are explicitly known and not just accepted in principle.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/06/is-catholic-church-ecclesiocentric-sspx.html



MARCH 27, 2012


The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commissions.html




SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2009
CDF(Holy Office) supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston in Letter

(Note only in the first part the Letter supports Fr. Leonard Feeney. The second part contradicts the first part )

 JUNE 28, 2011


We do not know any case of the baptism of desire so Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct in saying that there is no de facto baptism of desire,that we know of

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/06/since-we-do-not-know-any-case-on-earth.html


SEPTEMBER 22, 2017


Those who accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make Vatican Council II a rupture with Tradition :popes can avoid this

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/those-who-accept-letter-of-holy-office.html

(Note the  first part the Letter supports Fr. Leonard Feeney. The second part contradicts the first part.However when  interpreting Vatican Council II use traditional Feeneyism of the first part of the Letter and not irrational Cushingism, in the second part of the Letter. In this way Vatican Council II can be interpreted as not being a rupture with Tradition. )

APRIL 12, 2017

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 teaches anathema contradicts Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and the Council of Trent http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/letter-of-holy-office-1949-teaches.html

(Note:The Conclusion of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is Cushingite. So it is a rupture with Tradition.)

FEBRUARY 13, 2017

Image result for photo Vatican Council II book

Why must the Franciscans Sisters of the Immaculate and all Catholic religious communities have to accept BOD and I.I as being visible,objective,explicit and seen in the flesh in personal cases, for them to be accepted by Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez?.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/why-must-franciscans-sisters-of.html


JANUARY 11, 2016


The Catholic Encyclopedia (New Advent) has repeated the objective error of the Letter of the Holy Office (1949) : no explicit cases of the baptism of desire

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/the-american-encyclopedia-has-repeated.html

Image result for fR.jOHN hARDON PHOTOImage result for fR.jOHN hARDON PHOTO

JANUARY 8, 2016


The theology mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, is meaningless and does not apply.In a way they kind of duped all of us, including me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/the-theology-mentioned-in-letter-of.html



Rome made a mistake in 1949 and Fr.John Hardon did not notice it
The Catechumen you refer to is a hypothetical case for you and me. So it is not an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Fr.John Hardon too did not notice this
The Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis no where says that these cases are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Rome made a mistake in 1949

Continued

3- To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switich from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949


The Letter of the Holy Office makes it an issue. It considers the baptism of desire an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/the-letter-of-holy-office-makes-it.html
Supporters of Fr.Leonard Feeney unfortunately still use the irrational inference .It can be seen in their interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/supporters-of-frleonard-feeney.html#links 

2- To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

February 19, 2015

The contents of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 are irrational, false , non traditional and fantasy theology.It is a break with faith and reason

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-contents-of-letter-of-holy-office.html
February 9, 2015
The Letter of the Holy Office is irrational and has no magisterial precedent for this new doctrine
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-letter-of-holy-office-is-irrational.html


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/we-now-have-heresy-being-supported-by.html

Pope John Paul II also used the Marchetti irrationality to create a new theology in the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/pope-john-paul-ii-also-used-marchetti.html
________________________________________
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 2
http://eucharistandssion.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-vatican_8.html

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 3
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-interprets-vatican_9.html
 

 November 20, 2014
SSPX (USA) repeats the error in the Letter of the Holy Office : contradicts the dogma defined three times and also Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7)https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/sspx-is-repeating-error-in-letter-of.html
  
September 30, 2014
SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 contradicts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/sspx-general-chapter-statement-2012.html
September 29, 2014
For Cardinal Cushing to say that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus is heresy. It is also irrational.He was to give the imprimatur ?!
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/for-cardinal-cushing-to-say-that-there.html
September 24, 2014
Pope John Paul II also fell before the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/pope-john-paul-ii-also-fell-before.html
 
September 14, 2014
Franciscans of the Immaculate accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/franciscans-of-immaculate-accepted.html
August 18, 2014
Sedevacantists "traditionalists in name only" share the same very mistake with the liberals Novus Ordo Catholics-Cantarella
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/sedevacantists-traditionalists-in-name.html
  
August 18, 2014
The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake. Cardinal Marchetti-Selvaggiani assumed there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus-Cantarella, CathInfo forum
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-holy-office-1949-made-mistake.html


Continued

1- To re- interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feneeyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

APRIL 12, 2017

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 teaches anathema contradicts Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and the Council of Trent

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/letter-of-holy-office-1949-teaches.html
OCTOBER 13, 2016

An error was made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and much of the Vatican Council II theology is based on this error.This is what I know

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/an-error-was-made-in-letter-of-holy.html

JANUARY 18, 2016

Archbishop Lefebvre did not see the same wrong reasoning, as the inference in the Letter(1949) used in Vatican Council II.The SSPX has still not noticed this !!!

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/archbishop-lefebvre-accepted-inference.html

JANUARY 7, 2016

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 : from meaningless non applicable theology to heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/letter-of-holy-office-1949-from.html
 DECEMBER 30, 2015
The Letter made a mistake. Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/the-letter-made-mistakearchbishop.html

MARCH 14, 2015

After 1949 the error came in a big way into the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/after-1949-error-came-in-big-way-into.html

Traditionalists reject Vatican Council II with heresy and accept the Letter of the Holy Office with heresy. They do not see how the two are connected

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/traditionalists-reject-vatican-council.html#links


FEBRUARY 13, 2015ù
Bishop Schneider uses the common Gnostic interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-schneider-uses-common-gnostic.html

FEBRUARY 13, 2015

In itself the baptism of desire is not a problem. It is when it is considered an exception to the dogma that the error arises

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/in-itself-baptism-of-desire-is-not.html

The baptism of desire is accepted by me since it is not an exception to the dogma even when it occurs and it is known only to God http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-baptism-of-desire-is-accepted-by-me.html

The lawful authorities were saying that there were exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/i-have-received-e-mail-today.html

JULY 28, 2017
So objectively there were no exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the so Letter of the Holy Office was a classic 'oops'.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/so-objectively-there-were-no-exceptions.html
SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office conclusion : expedient religious are teaching it in Catechism classes


APRIL 12, 2017
Let Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston be anathema?They were teaching heresy. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire and they postulated exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/let-holy-office-1949-and-archbishop-of.html

 JANUARY 25, 2017

Cardinal Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/cardinal-richard-cushing-and-nostra.html

OCTOBER 10, 2016

The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-letter-of-holy-office-says-that-it.html

OCTOBER 2, 2016

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston contradicts the Catechism of Pope Pius X

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/letter-of-holy-office-1949-to.html

MAY 6, 2015
Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake and so school children in the Archdiocese of Detroit have to use an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/did-letter-of-holy-office-1949-make.html


Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-did-letter-of.html  


MARCH 6, 2015
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict also used the false premise and conclusion from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/pope-john-paul-ii-and-pope-benedict.html

MARCH 2, 2015

The Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis no where says that these cases are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Rome made a mistake in 1949

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-council-of-trent-mystici-corporis.html
FEBRUARY 28, 2015
Parts of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do affirm the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/parts-of-letter-of-holy-office-1949-and.html

Did Pope Pius XII make a mistake ? : implicit desire, invincible ignorance have nothing to do with extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/did-pope-pius-xii-make-mistake-implicit.html
From Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis they all have been using an irrational premise in the interpretation of magisterial texts



SSPX District Superior Italy makes the same factual error as Muller, Ladaria, Di Noi, Pozzo, Kaspar and Koch

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/sspx-district-superior-italy-makes-same.html#links



 

 Will Archbishop Augustine Di Noia acknowledge he made an error? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/will-archbishop-augustine-di-noia.html

Continued