Thursday, April 26, 2018

Pope Benedict prevented a true and rational theological interpretation of Vatican Council II being known. He controlled theology in the Church and it was the false theology : the secret is out

Since Vatican Council II  Pope Benedict prevented a true and rational theological interpretation being known. He controlled theology in the Church and it was the false theology. I do not get pleasure in writing all this. But it has to be said.
Vatican Council II after 1965 was a failure for the liberals and did not have a rupture with the past but it depended upon the Church hierarchy to say it.They had to keep it secret or make it known. They kept the truth hidden.
Don't get me wrong. The Masons and enemies of the Church hijacked the Council and used a false interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, to create a rupture with Tradition. So when the Council is read by Catholics today it is a rupture with Tradition.
But this is an illusion.
Since the liberals made a mistake.
They were helpless.
Then depended on an irrational premise to re-interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition and the whole Church fell for the ruse.
But the success of the trick depended on Catholics not knowing the truth. Not finding out about the false premise.
So here was the important role of Cardinal Ratzinger.Then  later as Pope Benedict he seems to have intentionally kept the truth hidden. But let us give him the  benefit of the doubt  since even popes from Paul VI did not seem to know.
But now the ruse is ended.
We have found the missing link. We know what makes Vatican Council II a rupture or a continuity with Tradition and like turning a switch on or off we  can change the interpretation.
We do not have to depend on the Magisterium to choose to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.
Pope Benedict controlled the false theology so he was trying to get the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and to accept the non traditional conclusion for canonical status.
He did not tell them that the Council could be interpreted without the irrational premise and it would not be a rupture with Tradition and this would be acceptable to him. No. He was careful not to say this.
But he gave himself away in March 2016 when he said that extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century there was a development, a rupture with Vatican Council II.That was the break I needed.There was no more ambiguity on this issue.
He was telling us that he accepted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. He had accepted a new version of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was not the same the 16th century version. So there were two magisterial interpretation of EENS, his and the one in the Middle Ages.
He did not say that there were also two interpretations of Vatican Council II his and that of a lay man and that the lay man has the support of priests and an archbishop.They agree with him.
All that lay man in Rome is basically saying is that hypothetical cases are simply hypothetical.
This is what Cardinal Ratzinger did not announce as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instead he allowed Archbishop Lefebvre to be excommunicated.
Even years after the excommunication he kept this truth hidden.Hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS and so there are no exceptions to EENS and neither are there any mentioned in Vatican Council II.
I repeat there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II.
I could repeat this line a hundred times.
There are no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II.
For those Catholics who understand what I am saying this is staggering.
Other  Catholics cannot understand what I say since they have been so conditioned to believe that possibilities and hypothetical cases are known exceptions to EENS.
Now we know.
Imagine the SSPX announcing this truth in public that hypothetical cases are not known exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2018.Obviously. Every body knows this it would be said. This is common knowledge.
But this was the secret which was hidden for 50 years.
This was the secret about EENS which was hidden for some 70 plus years.
It completely changes the understanding of Vatican Council II and the conditions necessary for a religious community to receive canonical status.-Lionel Andrades


APRIL 26, 2018


Pope Benedict heretically interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/pope-benedict-heretically-interpreted.html

APRIL 26, 2018


When will Father Matthias Gaudron, of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) comment on Pope Benedict's errors on Vatican Council II when it is relevant to the SSPX-Vatican Reconciliation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/when-will-father-matthias-gaudron-of.html


 APRIL 26, 2018




Pope Benedict was wrong on Vatican Council II.But it was also not known to the traditionalists and most of the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/pope-benedict-was-wrong-on-vatican.html


APRIL 26, 2018



Did Pope Bendedict intentionally not tell Abp. Lefebvre that Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS or was he confused too like every one else in the Church ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/did-pope-bendedict-intentionally-not.html



The Vortex—The Urgent Need : Michael Voris still does not say that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8,LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 in our reality : so there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II




 APRIL 25, 2018





Michael Voris is not sure of his theology so in the latest Vortex he has restricted himself to philosophy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/michael-voris-is-not-sure-of-his.html



APRIL 8, 2018



Fr.Paul McDonald is really saying he supports an exclusivist ecclesiology with no dual conclusions, heterodox passages, no passages against EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/frpaul-mcdonald-is-really-saying.html



APRIL 7, 2018

Even Vatican II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body ( the Catholic Church)- Fr.Paul McDonald , Fatima Center http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/even-vatican-ii-says-every-one-on-face.htm


Pope Benedict heretically interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS

Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation











From the blog The Epoymous Flower : If Words Could Kill: Catholic Apologetics Mafia Attacks Faithful Catholics

POPE BENEDICT HERETICALLY INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS 
Pope Beneduct heretically said that Jews do not need to convert in the present times, during the flap with the Jewish Left over the Revised Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews.
Then he heretically interpreted Vatican Council II, with the use of a false premise.The Council emerged as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This was his hermeneutic of discontinuity with Tradition.


He knowingly interpreted the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as referring to known people saved outside the Church. So he accepted the heretical Letter of the Holy Office 1949, which his friend Karl Rahner s.j placed in the Denzinger.He made the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils, obsolete(Christianity and the World Religions,ITC, Vatican). This was heresy and it was created by assuming that the baptism of desire etc referred to known people saved outside the Church.
This is irrational and a rupture between faith and reason.




With this error he created a schism with the popes of the past on outside the Church there is no salvation.Those Catholics who interpret Vatican Council II like him also have to be in schism with the past popes, when there is a rational choice.

Then he wanted the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to accept all this heresy and theological innovation if they wanted canonical status.
Along with Bishop Charles Morerod he would not allow the SSPX to use churches in Switzerland. They said the reason was doctrinal!!


REPORT IS AN EXPOSE OF APOSTASY AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE CHURCH-ROBERT SUNGENIS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/02/report-is-expose-of-apostasy-at-highest.html

DID THE POPE REALLY DENY THE FAITH ON THE NEED FOR JEWS TO CONVERT ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/did-pope-really-deny-faith-on-need-for.html#links

CDF CLARIFIES COMMENT ON CONDOMS BUT NOT JEWS : POPE CONTRADICTS BIBLE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2010/12/cdf-clarifies-comment-on-condoms-but.html#links

POPE SAYS REVISED GOOD FRIDAY PRAYER IS NOT FOR THE CONVERSION OF THE JEWS ? EARTHQUAKE SHIFT IN CATHOLIC TEACHING ? 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2010/12/pope-says-revised-good-friday-prayer-is.html 

Pope Benedict XVI’s objective,factual error in Light of the World(Ignatius) p.107 is contributing to widespread liberalism and dissent in the Catholic Church.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/Light%20of%20the%20World

Msgr. Guido Pozzo could announce Vatican Council II agrees with literal interpretation of dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus while Nostra Aetate says Catholics are the ‘new people of God’ : pope made an error in Light of the World- all this is relevant to the Vatican-SSPX differences 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/msgr-guido-pozzo-could-announce-vatican.html


Image result for Photos of Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney
CATHOLIC NEWS BLACK OUT ON BAGNASCO-RABBI DEAL
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2009/09/catholic-news-black-out-on-bagnasco.html#links

APRIL 18, 2012
POPE CONTRADICTS BIBLE, CARDINAL LEVADA ISSUES NO CLARIFICATION. EXPECTS OFFICAL CLARIFICATION FROM BISHOP FELLAY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/pope-contradicts-bible-cardinal-levada.html      
-Lionel Andrades

________________________















Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation

Related image







https://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2018/04/if-words-could-kill-catholic.html?showComment=1524758152175#c6543020629602366587

When will Father Matthias Gaudron, of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) comment on Pope Benedict's errors on Vatican Council II when it is relevant to the SSPX-Vatican Reconciliation


Comment from the blog The Epoymous Flower
When will Father Matthias Gaudron, of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) comment on this when it is relevant to the SSPX-Vatican Reconciliation.


APRIL 19, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/pope-benedict-xvi-could-have.html

DECEMBER 8, 2017
Pope Benedict's entire false theology is pegged on there being known salvation outside the Church.When in reality we do not know any such casehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/pope-benedicts-entire-false-theology-is.html

MARCH 15, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI means there is known salvation outside the Church when he states 'when they can be saved even without it?” '. He is a Cushingite. He assumes invisible cases are visible
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/pope-benedict-xvi-means-there-is-known.html

JUNE 22, 2016
Objectively heretical writings of Pope Benedict XVI ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/objectively-heretical-writings-of-pope.html

Pope Benedict's Avvenire interview contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council IIhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/pope-benedicts-avvenire-interview.html

When Pope Benedict 'breaks his silence' it usually is to please the Masons? 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/when-pope-benedict-breaks-his-silence.html

April 7,2014
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J and Pope Benedict XVI made a factual error : Analysis http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-and-pope.html#links


-Lionel Andrades



http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2018/04/critical-observations-on-joseph.html#comment-form





Pope Benedict was wrong on Vatican Council II.But it was also not known to the traditionalists and most of the Church.



Comments from The Epoymous Flower  Critical Observations on Joseph Ratzinger’s Classic Text
  1. That along with some of his other works were listed on Opus Dei’s version of The Index of Forbidden Books (Guia Bibliografia : Bibliographical Guide) until he became Pope Benedict XVI!
    Reply

  2. Lionel :
    He was also wrong on Vatican Council II.But it was also not known to the traditionalists and most of the Church.

    APRIL 24, 2018
    Vatican Council II is not how Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei interpret it (Graphics)
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/vatican-council-ii-is-not-how_24.html
http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2018/04/critical-observations-on-joseph.html#comment-form


Did Pope Bendedict intentionally not tell Abp. Lefebvre that Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS or was he confused too like every one else in the Church ?



Comment from The Eponymous Flower, Critical Observations on Joseph Ratzinger’s Classic Text

Did he do it intentionally or was he confused like every body else in the Church?

JULY 20, 2017
Did Pope Benedict intentionally not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/did-pope-benedict-intentionally-not_20.html

JANUARY 26, 2018
Pope Benedict needs to recant and end the doctrinal deception in the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-needs-to-recant-and-end.html

JANUARY 2, 2018
The new Catholic faith in salvation and morals of Pope Benedict, Cardinal Muller and Rocco Buttiglione
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/the-new-catholic-faith-in-salvation-and.html

JANUARY 2, 2018
Pope Benedict praised Cardinal Muller for defending a false 'faith'
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-praised-cardinal-muller.html
-Lionel Andrades



http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2018/04/critical-observations-on-joseph.html#comment-form




Jesus was ' a rigorist '

Featured ImageIt was good to have the Trump Administration say abortion is not a human right.No one says it here.Neither do they say that homosexual unions are not human rights.Nor do they say that they are a Satanic rite.
Neither in Italy do they say that the Catholic Church has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.All non Catholics are in Hell and those on earth are oriented there unless they convert into the Catholic Church as members (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).
They don't say this in Poland too where the government has consecrated the country to Christ the King but interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So they can no more proclaim the  Social Reign of Christ the King over all poliltical legislation based on outside the Catholic Church there being no known salvation.
In the West there is only freedom to say things which are pro-Satan. So the new laws being created are anti-Catholic.We can see the enemies of the Church unite, legally, politically.
Our Lady asked us to be prepated for this.This was her prophecy to Fr. Stefano Gobbi founder of the Marian Movement of Priests.
Now even in little things, socially, we have to decide if we are for God or Satan.The devil wants to eliminate all respect for Christ.God the Father permits this for the purification of the Church and the emergence of a pure and faithful Mystical Body of Christ.
Meanwhile ecclesiastical Masonry continues to work for the Enemy.On March 1, 2018 at the Press Conference for Placuit Deo Cardinal Ladaria said Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ subsist it in ) was an exception to the traditional teaching on the Church having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.This is a denial of Jesus and the Church.
Then Cardinal Nicols  last month told the BBC that the Catholic Church does not say that anyone in particular is in Hell. He denied Vatican Council II.It tells us all who do not have have faith and baptism cannot be saved. Those who have died without  faith and baptism are in Hell.So we know.
Cardinal Nicols also said that the Church does not teach that there is fire and brimstone in Hell. He contradicted the Bible and the saints.
The cardinal gives the Eucharist at Mass to pro-abortion politicians and active homosexuals and does not state that abortion and homosexual unions are not a human right.He can also judge in England when suicide is not a mortal sin and the victim can be given a Catholic funeral.This is ecclesiastical Masonry. He may not be an active member of the Lodge but he supports their policies.
He changes and denies Church teachings on morals and faith ( salvation). Satan allows him to live comfortably .If he provoked and did not compromise, Pope Francis would consider him 'rigorist'.
A Catholic political party is needed in Britain which will work independently of him.It would support and teach Catholic theology and doctrine.Cardinalo Nicols like the pope, doesn't want to be a martyr.
Jesus was rigorist for them
in 1Cor.6:9 when he said that homosexuals and drunkards could not inherit the Kingdom of God. They were going to Hell.
Jesus was  rigorist for them in the Gospel Reading yesterday (Wednesday March 25) when he said :"Go into the whole world and proclaim the Gospel to every creature.
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved;
whoever does not believe will be condemned.'
Outside the Church of that time there was no salvation.
but the sheep did not listen to them.
I am the gate.
Whoever enters through me will be saved,
and will come in and go out and find pasture.
A thief comes only to steal and slaughter and destroy;
I came so that they might have life and have it more abundantly."
Today morning at Mass in Italian the priest in his homily said that prudence was important and we should ask ourself what would be the consiequences of our action.He meant compromise with Satan then there will be comfortable consequences.He was referring to worldly prudence.But if our reference is Jesus, God among us, God as man, who was not prudent before the High Priest and the Jewish Sanhedrin, then the consequences must be the same as His.
Abortion and sodomy are human rights for Satan and those who support him.When our ideal for living is Jesus, then it is prudent, to say this.-Lionel Andrades
 
 
April 25, 2018
A Catholic political party is needed to oppose Satan and leftist fascism and extremism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/a-catholic-political-party-is-needed-to.html


April 25, 2018
To return to Catholic doctrinal sanity in the country the Polish President Andrzej Duda must affirm common sense and what is common knowedlge by stating that :"There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ". http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/to-return-to-catholic-doctrinal-sanity.html

April 25, 2018
Michael Voris is not sure of his theology so in the latest Vortex he has restricted himself to philosophy  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/michael-voris-is-not-sure-of-his.html