When now see before us the whole
Catholic Church coming back to Tradition at all rites and liturgies.
Since with the rational premise, Vatican Council II
has what Pope Benedict called, the hermeneutic of continuity, with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
Monday, May 9, 2022
We now see before us the whole Catholic Church coming back to Tradition at all rites and liturgies.
When Pope Francis and Pope Benedict interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational and not False Premise the Catholic Church will once again be traditional. Rome will have come back to the Faith
AUGUST 14, 2021
Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete.Catholics can interpret the Council with a rational premise and undo the error of half a century.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-francis-interpretation-of-vatican.html
MAY 8, 2022
________________________________________________
When Pope Francis and Pope Benedict interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational and not False Premise there will be no practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, in the text of the Council. So they will become conservative or traditionalists. They will be following the old theology and the old ecclesiology. The present liberalism which is formed theological from the False Premise will no more be there. The Catholic Church will once again be traditional. Rome will have come back to the Faith.
For Catholics there will only be one
option in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. It will be rational,
traditional and non heretical. It will be in harmony with the past Magisterium and so will not be schismatic.
Those who do not accept this interpretation
of Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition will be in schism. It would be
unethical to continue to use the False Premise to interpret the Council and
other Magisterial Documents.-Lionel Andrades
MAY 9, 2022
If Pope Francis
interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then the Council
becomes traditional and the pope supports Tradition, and the Church becomes traditional.
It is hard to imagine a traditional pope but with the Rational Premise there is
no other choice. They have to be rational and traditional. Since without the
False Premise there is no liberalism.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/if-pope-francis-interprets-vatican_9.html
MAY 9, 2022
The German Federal Ministry of Education and the
German Federal Minister are interpreting Vatican Council II with the False and
not Rational Premise, just like Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, and this is
dishonest. Students are not told to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational
Premise, Inference and Traditional Conclusion.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-german-federal-ministry-of.html
MAY 9, 2022
MARCH 12, 2022
Is the German Synodal Way legal?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/is-german-synodal-way-legal_12.html
1 Athanasius Creed
2.Nicene Creed
MARCH 28, 2022
The first commandment of God is: I am the Lord thy God; thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.
198. What is the first commandment of God?
The first commandment of God is: I am the Lord thy God; thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.
Thou shalt not have strange Gods before me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth. (Exodus 20:3-4)
The first commandment of God is: I am the Lord thy God; thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.
Thou shalt not have strange Gods before me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth. (Exodus 20:3-4)
199. What are we commanded by the first commandment?
By the first commandment we are commanded to offer to God alone the supreme worship that is due Him.
It is written, "The Lord thy God shalt thou worship, and him only shalt thou serve." (Luke 4:8)
By the first commandment we are commanded to offer to God alone the supreme worship that is due Him.
It is written, "The Lord thy God shalt thou worship, and him only shalt thou serve." (Luke 4:8)
200. How do we worship God?
We worship God by acts of faith, hope, and charity, and by adoring Him and praying to Him.
We worship God by acts of faith, hope, and charity, and by adoring Him and praying to Him.
201. What does faith oblige us to do?
Faith obliges us: first, to make efforts to find out what God has revealed; second, to believe firmly what God has revealed; third, to profess our faith openly whenever necessary.
Therefore, everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. (Matthew 10:32)
Faith obliges us: first, to make efforts to find out what God has revealed; second, to believe firmly what God has revealed; third, to profess our faith openly whenever necessary.
Therefore, everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. (Matthew 10:32)
202. What does hope oblige us to do?
Hope obliges us to trust firmly that God will give us eternal life and the means to obtain it.
Paul, a servant of God and apostle of Jesus Christ, in accordance with the faith of God's elect and the full knowledge of the truth which is according to piety, in the hope of life everlasting which God, who does not lie, promised before the ages began. (Titus 1:1-2)
Hope obliges us to trust firmly that God will give us eternal life and the means to obtain it.
Paul, a servant of God and apostle of Jesus Christ, in accordance with the faith of God's elect and the full knowledge of the truth which is according to piety, in the hope of life everlasting which God, who does not lie, promised before the ages began. (Titus 1:1-2)
203. What does charity oblige us to do?
Charity obliges us to love God above all things because He is infinitely good, and to love our neighbor as ourselves for the love of God.
And one of them, a doctor of the Law, putting him to the test, asked him, "Master, which is the great commandment in the Law?" Jesus said to him, "'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind.' This is the greatest and the first commandment. And the second is like it, 'Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets." (Matthew 22:35-40)
Charity obliges us to love God above all things because He is infinitely good, and to love our neighbor as ourselves for the love of God.
And one of them, a doctor of the Law, putting him to the test, asked him, "Master, which is the great commandment in the Law?" Jesus said to him, "'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind.' This is the greatest and the first commandment. And the second is like it, 'Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets." (Matthew 22:35-40)
204. How can a Catholic best safeguard his faith?
A Catholic can best safeguard his faith by making frequent acts of faith, by praying for a strong faith, by studying his religion very earnestly, by living a good life, by good reading, by refusing to associate with the enemies of the Church, and by not reading books and papers opposed to the Church and her teaching.
I know that after my departure fierce wolves will get in among you, and will not spare the flock. And from among your own selves men will rise speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. (Acts 20:29-30)
A Catholic can best safeguard his faith by making frequent acts of faith, by praying for a strong faith, by studying his religion very earnestly, by living a good life, by good reading, by refusing to associate with the enemies of the Church, and by not reading books and papers opposed to the Church and her teaching.
I know that after my departure fierce wolves will get in among you, and will not spare the flock. And from among your own selves men will rise speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. (Acts 20:29-30)
205. How does a Catholic sin against faith?
A Catholic sins against faith by apostasy, heresy, indifferentism, and by taking part in non-Catholic worship.
A Catholic sins against faith by apostasy, heresy, indifferentism, and by taking part in non-Catholic worship.
206. Why does a Catholic sin against faith by taking part in non-Catholic worship.
A Catholic sins against faith by taking part in non-Catholic worship when he intends to identify himself with a religion he knows is defective.
This is why I was born, and why I have come into the world, to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears my voice. (John 18:37)
A Catholic sins against faith by taking part in non-Catholic worship when he intends to identify himself with a religion he knows is defective.
This is why I was born, and why I have come into the world, to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears my voice. (John 18:37)
207. What are the sins against hope?
The sins against hope are presumption and despair.
The sins against hope are presumption and despair.
208. When does a person sin by presumption?
A person sins by presumption when he trusts that he can be saved by his own efforts without God's help, or by God's help without his own efforts.
Nay I do not even judge my own self. For I have nothing on my conscience, yet I am not thereby justified. (I Corinthians 4:4)
A person sins by presumption when he trusts that he can be saved by his own efforts without God's help, or by God's help without his own efforts.
Nay I do not even judge my own self. For I have nothing on my conscience, yet I am not thereby justified. (I Corinthians 4:4)
209. When does a person sin by despair?
A person sins by despair when he deliberately refuses to trust that God will give him the necessary help to save his soul.
May no temptation take hold of you but such as man is equal to. God is faithful and will not permit you to be tempted beyond your strength, but with the temptation will also give you a way out that you may be able to bear it. (I Corinthians 10:13)
A person sins by despair when he deliberately refuses to trust that God will give him the necessary help to save his soul.
May no temptation take hold of you but such as man is equal to. God is faithful and will not permit you to be tempted beyond your strength, but with the temptation will also give you a way out that you may be able to bear it. (I Corinthians 10:13)
210. What are the chief sins against charity?
The chief sins against charity are hatred of God and of our neighbor, envy, sloth, and scandal.
Charity does not envy. (I Corinthians 13:4)
The chief sins against charity are hatred of God and of our neighbor, envy, sloth, and scandal.
Charity does not envy. (I Corinthians 13:4)
211. Besides the sins against faith, hope, and charity, what other sins does the first commandment forbid?
Besides the sins against faith, hope, and charity, the first commandment forbids also superstition and sacrilege.
Besides the sins against faith, hope, and charity, the first commandment forbids also superstition and sacrilege.
212. When does a person sin by superstition?
A person sins by superstition when he attributes to a creature a power that belongs to God alone, as when he makes use of charms or spells, believes in dreams or fortune-telling, or goes to spiritists.
Neither let there be found among you any one that ... consulteth soothsayers, or observeth dreams and omens. Neither let there be any wizard, nor charmer. (Deuteronomy 19:10-11)
A person sins by superstition when he attributes to a creature a power that belongs to God alone, as when he makes use of charms or spells, believes in dreams or fortune-telling, or goes to spiritists.
Neither let there be found among you any one that ... consulteth soothsayers, or observeth dreams and omens. Neither let there be any wizard, nor charmer. (Deuteronomy 19:10-11)
213. When does a person sin by sacrilege?
A person sins by sacrilege when he mistreats sacred persons, places, or things.
They have set thy sanctuary ablaze, they have profaned the dwelling of thy name on the earth. (Psalm 73:7)
A person sins by sacrilege when he mistreats sacred persons, places, or things.
They have set thy sanctuary ablaze, they have profaned the dwelling of thy name on the earth. (Psalm 73:7)
214. Does the first commandment forbid us to honor the saints in heaven?
The first commandment does not forbid us to honor the saints in heaven, provided we do not give them the honor that belongs to God alone.
For, behold, henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. (Luke 1:48)
The first commandment does not forbid us to honor the saints in heaven, provided we do not give them the honor that belongs to God alone.
For, behold, henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. (Luke 1:48)
215. Why do we honor the saints in heaven?
We honor the saints in heaven because they practiced great virtue when they were on earth, and because in honoring those who are the chosen friends of God we honor God Himself.
We honor the saints in heaven because they practiced great virtue when they were on earth, and because in honoring those who are the chosen friends of God we honor God Himself.
216. How can we honor the saints?
We can honor the saints: first, by imitating their holy lives; second, by praying to them; third, by showing respect to their relics and images.
Brethren, be imitators of me, and mark those who walk after the pattern you have in us. (Philippians 3:17)
We can honor the saints: first, by imitating their holy lives; second, by praying to them; third, by showing respect to their relics and images.
Brethren, be imitators of me, and mark those who walk after the pattern you have in us. (Philippians 3:17)
217. When we pray to the saints what do we ask them to do?
When we pray to the saints we ask them to offer their prayers to God for us.
When we pray to the saints we ask them to offer their prayers to God for us.
218. How do we know that the saints will pray for us?
We know that the saints will pray for us because they are with God and have great love for us.
We know that the saints will pray for us because they are with God and have great love for us.
219. Why do we honor relics?
We honor relics because they are the bodies of the saints or objects connected with the saints or with Our Lord.
We honor relics because they are the bodies of the saints or objects connected with the saints or with Our Lord.
220. When does the first commandment forbid the making or the use of statues and pictures?
The first commandment forbids the making or the use of statues and pictures only when they promote false worship.
Thou shalt not have strange Gods before me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth. (Exodus 20:3-4)
The first commandment forbids the making or the use of statues and pictures only when they promote false worship.
Thou shalt not have strange Gods before me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth. (Exodus 20:3-4)
221. Is it right to show respect to the statues and pictures of Christ and of the saints?
It is right to show respect to the statues and pictures of Christ and of the saints, just as it is right to show respect to the images of those whom we honor or love on earth.
It is right to show respect to the statues and pictures of Christ and of the saints, just as it is right to show respect to the images of those whom we honor or love on earth.
222. Do we honor Christ and the saints when we pray before the crucifix, relics, and sacred images?
We honor Christ and the saints when we pray before the crucifix, relics, and sacred images because we honor the persons they represent; we adore Christ and venerate the saints.
We honor Christ and the saints when we pray before the crucifix, relics, and sacred images because we honor the persons they represent; we adore Christ and venerate the saints.
223. Do we pray to the crucifix or to the images and relics of the saints?
We do not pray to the crucifix or to the images and relics of the saints, but to the persons they represent.
https://www.catholicity.com/baltimore-catechism/lesson17.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-first-commandment-of-god-is-i-am.html
________________________________________
We do not pray to the crucifix or to the images and relics of the saints, but to the persons they represent.
https://www.catholicity.com/baltimore-catechism/lesson17.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-first-commandment-of-god-is-i-am.html
________________________________________
FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 2022
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake. The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference can take, the German Church back to the original teachings of the Church.
1. He must not use a Fake Premise to interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II etc.
2. He must interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II, Creeds, Catechisms etc) with a Rational Premise. This is Catholic and it is being honest.
I interpret Church Documents with the Rational Premise.So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), for me.
Now Vatican Council II is being interpreted with a Fake Premise by the German Bishops Conference and the German Synodal Way.
The Fake Premise is used by the German government, Lutheran, ecumenical and inter-faith organizations.
Bishop Georg Batzing uses the Fake Premise (invisible people are visible) instead of the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible in 2022). He then chooses the False Inference ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church as referred to in LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are physically visible in 1965-2022). He does not choose the Rational Inference( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water, are always invisible for us in these present times)
So with the Fake Premise the non-traditional conclusion is outside the Church there is known salvation and there are exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors etc. This is not the orthodox, and traditional conclusion of outside the Church there is no known salvation, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only. So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, the Creeds and Catechisms and the dogma EENS in the present times. There is no break with Tradition.
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake.
The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.This is being ethical and Catholic. -Lionel Andrades
Bettina Stark-Watzinger is the Roman
Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany : she could check the
mistakes on Vatican Council II being taught at the schools, colleges and
universities
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/bettina-stark-watzinger-is-roman.html
AT HOLY COMMUNION AND CONFIRMATION CLASSES THE CHILDREN ARE TAUGHT TO REJECT THE ATHANASIUS CREED, CHANGE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE NICENE CREED AND INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED ALSO WITH A FALSE PREMISE.THE SAME ERROR IS EXTENDED TO THE FIRST COMMANDMENT.
____________
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Fake premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Fake conclusion
So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.
___________________________________________
BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Rational Premise
The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021
They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Rational Conclusion
They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
__________
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fake premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
_____________________
NOVEMBER 17, 2020
For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict
For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict.
Q. 1140. What is the first Commandment?
A. The first Commandment is: I am the Lord thy God: thou shalt not have strange gods before me.- Baltimore Catechism
THE FIRST COMMANDMENT
- I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.
It is written: "You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve."- Catechism of the Catholic Church
So the First Commandment which says? I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt have no other gods beside me, has been changed.
Since even the monotheist and pagan religions which do not believe in Christ have true worship, for the present two popes.Since outside the Church there is salvation for them instead of outside the Church there is no salvation.
For me there is true worship in only the Catbholic Church and outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and no true worship.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/for-pope-francis-outside-church-there.html
NOVEMBER 17, 2020
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict along with the Vatican dicasteries and Congregations, interpret the Creeds irrationally, non traditionally, heretically and schismatically
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-along.html
___________________
MARCH 28, 2022
We now have unity on Catholic doctrine and theology. The division brought into the Church, with liberalism was created with a False Premise.It has been identified and avoided.
We now have unity on Catholic doctrine and theology. The division brought into the Church, with liberalism was created with a False Premise.It has been identified and avoided.
So it means that at every Holy Mass-irrespective of the rite or language, we are back to the old theology. Outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation.
BIBLE STUDY GROUPS
So we can have Bible Study groups in homes, with the Bible interpreted, to support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
STREET MISSION
So we can have missionary groups, who are willing to go into the streets or at events to proclaim Christ with the traditional ecclesiocentric theology.We have unity on doctrine. There is no more the division on doctrine brought into the Church with the New Theology based upon the False Premise.
They will be going back to Tradition-the dogmas and doctrines- and accepting Vatican Council II (Rational) only.
-Lionel Andrades
https://www.catholicregister.org/ysn/ysn-news/item/32193-street-mission-fast-goes-on-despite-pandemic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/we-now-have-unity-on-catholic-doctrine.html_____________________________________________
MARCH 26, 2022
It was Cardinal Richard Cushing, Archbishop of Boston and the American Jesuits, who were in heresy and schism with the False Premise and not Fr. Leonard Feeney
JANUARY 26, 2017
An innovation, a false premise was brought into the Church - Card.Cushing drafted Nostra Aetate with an ecumenical Christology and without the old ecclesiology
Cardinal Richard Cushing brought in a revolution in the Catholic Church.In Nostra Aetate,Vatican Council II he replaced traditional exclusivist ecclesiology with a vague Christology.He did it by simply assuming invisible cases were visible.They were then inferred to be examples of salvation without membership in the Church.So there now was known salvation outside the Church and so the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was put aside.FOUNDATIONAL DOGMA ELIMINATED
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was a foundational dogma for other doctrines was suddenly eliminated. It had its effect on ecumenism, mission, inter religious dialogue, Social Reign of Christ the King over all political systems, non separation of Church and State, inter-faith marriages, Canon Law etc.
Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston played ' a vital role in drafting Nostra Aetate I mentioned in a previous post.1
CUSHING APPROVED THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE ADDRESSED TO HIM
Cardinal Richard Cushing had accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him.It assumed that there were known cases of the baptism of desire which were explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as held by Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in Boston.So there was salvation outside the Church for him. Non Catholics could be saved without beinging incorporated into the Church as members.
Cardinal Richard Cushing had accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him.It assumed that there were known cases of the baptism of desire which were explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as held by Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in Boston.So there was salvation outside the Church for him. Non Catholics could be saved without beinging incorporated into the Church as members.
But there are no such cases, past or present!
This was a mistake in the Letter 1949 which has been repeated in Nostra Aetate.
THE LETTER CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA EENS
THE LETTER CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA EENS
The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus over the centuries taught that every one needed to be incorporated into the Church as members. The Letter says the opposite and it was accepted by Cardinal Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston...
CUSHING,NOSTRA AETATE AND THE LETTER PROCLAIMS CHRIST WITHOUT THE NECESSITY OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHURCH
Nostra Aetate proclaims Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.Since Cardinal Cushing had accepted that there was known salvation outside the Church. In other words at that time or in the past, someone in Rome or the Archdiocese of Boston knew the name and surname of someone saved outside the Church; without faith and baptism.This is irrational and non traditional.How could there be known exceptions?
HERETICAL
HERETICAL
It is also heretical since it is rejecting a defined dogma by assuming invisible people saved outside the Church were visible.Then it is inferred that they were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known over the centuries....
KNOWN CASES OF BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Cushing assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance referred to personally known cases.These known people were saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church,for him. This was the reasoning in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him.
NEW DOCTRINE WITH NEW THEOLOGY BASED ON IRRATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL REASONING.
NEW DOCTRINE WITH NEW THEOLOGY BASED ON IRRATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL REASONING.
So Ad Gentes 7 says those men cannot be saved ' who though aware'....In other words not every one with no exception needs to enter the Church for salvation but only those who are aware of Jesus and the Church.Notice the new doctrine created with the new theology based on invisible cases being visible exceptions to the old ecclesiology.
ALL MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS WITHOUT EENS
ALL MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS WITHOUT EENS
So after Vatican Council II all magisterial documents avoided the ecclesiocentrism of the past for an ecumenical Christology.All magisterial documents are without the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
DOGMA MISSING IN REDEMPTORIS MISSIO
DOGMA MISSING IN REDEMPTORIS MISSIO
See it in Redemptoris Missio.
The commitment of the laity to the work of evangelization is changing ecclesial life, while particular churches are more willing to meet with the members of other Christian churches and other religions, and to enter into dialogue and cooperation with them. Above all, there is a new awareness that missionary activity is a matter for all Christians, for all dioceses and parishes, Church institutions and associations.-Redemptoris Missio 2.
Missionary activity is a matter for all Christians says Cardinal Ratzinger in Redemptoros Missio 2. He does not state that all Christians need to formally enter the Church as members.
Cardinal Ratzinger in Redemptoris Missio continues to present salvation only in Jesus and without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.
Cardinal Ratzinger in Redemptoris Missio continues to present salvation only in Jesus and without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.
This is a major shift in doctrine.It is a complete break away from the ecclesiocentrism of the past.
This was possible since Cardinal Cushing had still maintained the excommunication on Fr. Leonard Feeney and Rome did not defend the priest.For some 19 years the excommunication was not lifted.
So the world wide impression was that there were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It was wrongly assumed that there were personally known, objectively seen cases of non Catholics saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
VIOLATES PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
This is irrational. It is an objective error.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and upon this error a new theology is created in Nostra Aetate.
VIOLATES PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
This is irrational. It is an objective error.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and upon this error a new theology is created in Nostra Aetate.
With a false premise making Vatican Council II(NA) a break with Tradition there was a non traditional conclusion, a new doctrine which was accepted in the Church. This was an innovation based on an irrationality and so it could not be the work of the Holy Spirit.
Cushing made an error, a human error.
Cushing made an error, a human error.
Upon this innovation Cushing and the Jesuits presented Nostra Aetate with an ecumenical Christology and rejected the centruries old ecclesiology of the Church.
-Lionel Andrades
1
January 25, 2017
Cardinal Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/cardinal-richard-cushing-and-nostra.html
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2021
Card. Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Card. Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
SUNDAY, JUNE 16, 2013
Cardinal Walter Kaspar has drawn upon the Richard Cushing Confusion
Cardinal Walter Kaspar has drawn upon the Richard Cushing Confusion and traditionalists have accepted it hook,line and sinker.The liberal cardinal says Vatican Council II is ambigous. Yes it is, but only, if one reads it with the Richard Cushing Confusion. This results in dual meanings. He interprets the Council with the Richard Cushing Error, which is,the dead who are saved are personally known and visible to us.
One has to be aware of this basic error of Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston.He helped insert sentences in Vatican Council II which are irrelevant deadwood and can cause confusion.
The dead wood are statements or references, which are an irrelevancy to the main point being made in a Council text.
For example Ad Gentes 7 says 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation. This is the main point. The dead wood is ' those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it". This is meaningful at the dejure, in principle level. At the defacto ( in reality) level it is meaningless. It is relevant theoretically. Practically, personally, we do not know any such case.So it is irrelevant.
Similarly we do not know any one saved 'inculpably ignorant of the Gospel'(AG 7) In reality we do not know any such case. So it does not contradict the main point. In reality every one needs faith and baptism for salvation.
Cardinal Kaspar interprets Vatican Councl II as having a dual meaning.In other words the dead-saved are physically visible (Richard Cushing Error) and so Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 contradict itself.(Richard Cushing Confusion).Vatican Council II becomes confusing and ambigous.
So when a Catholic asks 'Why must the Gospel be annonced in the whole world if salvation is also possible outside the Church?', this is a question based on the Richard Cushing Error.The questioner assumes that there are known exceptions. These irrational cases, of the dead being saved and visible, are 'exceptions' for the Gospel to be proclaimed to every one with no exception in the present times'
Cardinal Daneels, Cardinal Kurt Koch, Fr.Hans Kung, the late Fr.Karl Rahner S.J and others have interpreted the Council ambigously with the Richard Cushing Confusion.
The Gospel must be announced in the the whole world since if salvation is also possible outside the Church we do not know of any case in reality.
-Lionel Andrades
THURSDAY, AUGUST 30, 2018
Repost : Pope Benedict wrongly assumed Robert Kennedy, Richard Cushing and the Vatican ( Holy Office'49) were objectively correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney made a mistake
MAY 21, 2016
It was Robert Kennedy who asked Cardinal Cushing to suppress Fr.Leonard Feeney according to the memoirs of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy who was present when his father Joseph Kennedy called up his friend,the Archbishop of Boston.
Yes, it looks like all four played historic roles in the shaping of Christian theology. Reading Teddy Kennedy’s memoir, True Compass, just published today and already No. 2 on Amazon, I discovered a remarkable anecdote about how Bobby Kennedy may have been a crucial figure in the suppression of the controversial Boston Jesuit, Fr. Leonard Feeney. In Senator Ted’s account, Bobby, while a student at Harvard, was outraged at hearing Feeney declare that no non-Catholic can be saved:
[Bobby] discussed it with our father one weekend at the Cape house. I well remember the conversation.
Dad could not believe that Bobby had heard Father Feeney correctly. “But,” he said, “if you feel strongly that you did, I’m going to go into the other room and call Richard. Maybe he’ll want you to go up to Boston and see him.”
“Richard” was Richard Cardinal Cushing. Dad and the cardinal enjoyed a long and profound friendship. . . .
Bobby said he felt strongly indeed. Bang! Dad called up “Richard” and arranged for Bobby to visit him. The cardinal, as nonplussed as Dad, sent some of his people over to hear Father Feeney’s Thursday evening lecture. When he found that my brother was right, Cushing banned Feeney from speaking there; Feeney refused to obey the order, and in September 1949 the archdiocese formally condemned the priest’s teaching. . . . In February 1952, Father Feeney was excommunicated. 1
The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was eliminated.The new salvation doctrine was placed in Vatican Council II. The Council reflects the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The Letter(1949) discarded the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma.To do this it had to assume invisible cases ( baptism of desire etc) were physically visible.Hypothetical theories were supposed to be 'practically known'.With this irrationality they wrongly reasoned that there were physically known exceptions to centuries old understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus,which was defined by three Councils.
THEY BROUGHT A NEW PREMISE INTO THEOLOGY
They brought into the Catholic Church a new premise ( there are physically known cases of persons saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church) and a new conclusion ( so outside the Church there is known salvation, all do not need to formally convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits placed this new concept of salvation in the text of Vatican Council II. The new concept was that hypothetical cases of 'seeds of the Word' (AG 11), 'elements of sanctification and truth'( LG 8), 'imperfect communion with the Church' (UR 3), 'a ray of that Truth' (NA 2) etc were 'practical exceptions' to the Feeneyite interpretation on exclusive salvation in the Church.
LUMEN GENTIUM 14 BASED ON THE LETTER IN THE FR. LEONARD FEENEY CASE
So they concluded in Lumen Gentium 14 that not every one needs to enter the Church for salvation but only those who know, those who were not in invincible ignorance. This was the conclusion, the inference, of the Letter's false premise.
Those who were in invincible ignorance, it was speculated, thorugh no fault of thier own could be saved, and these cases were for them, objectively known.This is the rub. They were suppposed to be physically seen to be relevant to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology.
The irony is that inspite of all this confusion in Vatican Council II, the Council can still be interpreted in harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.To do this, we only have to be aware of hypothetical cases and know that they are not exceptions to the dogma opposed by the Kennedys.
Since we know there cannot be any known exception to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus, for us humans, there cannot be anything in Vatican Council II which contradicts Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.The magisterium made a mistake.
There cannot be ' a development' with Vatican Council II since there cannot be any objective exception to the dogma.So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus as interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.
Outside the Church there is no salvation since there is no known salvation outside the Church. There are no known exceptions. There canot be exceptions in Vatican Council II.
So when Pope Benedict recently said in the interview with Avvenire, that there was a development with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, and it was no more like in the 16th century, he was supporting the error of the Holy Office and Cardinal Cushing, after the Kennedy intervention.
Pope Benedict assumed Robert Kennedy, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Holy Office 1949 were objectively correct and that Fr.Leonard Feeney overlooked the baptism of desire, which for Pope Benedict, is objective and seen in the flesh.-Lionel Andrades
1.
ROBERT KENNEDY ASKED RICHARD CUSHING TO SUPPRESS FR.LEONARD FEENEY
Bobby Kennedy’s intervention : ' Reinforced by Cardinal Cushing’s discussions with the papal hierarchy in Rome, it became an animating impulse of the Second Ecumenical Council of the Vatican, which opened under Pope John XXIII in 1962' http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/bobby-kennedys-intervention-reinforced.html
___________________
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical to interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
https://twitter.com/LionelAndrades1/status/1522311748379942912/video/1
https://twitter.com/i/status/1522311748379942912https://twitter.com/LionelAndrades1/status/1522311748379942912
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical to interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
https://twitter.com/LionelAndrades1/status/1522311748379942912/video/1
https://twitter.com/i/status/1522311748379942912
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
