Vatican Council II became a conspiracy in the Church when Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Ottaviani, Archbishop Lefebvre ,Cardinal Wojtyla and later Cardinal Ratzinger, chose to interpret the Council, with a false premise, as did the Council Fathers.They all could have interpreted the Council without the irrational reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO). LOHO sought to do away with the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
It seems like a conspiracy through which every one kept silent.Then books were written to support the false narrative on the Council.Who among the authors were writing their books in ignorance, obedience or malice we do not know. There was Fr. Hans Kung, Fr. John Hardon, Mons. Clifford Fenton...but all wrote their books by not seeing hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.Instead what is implicit was assumed to be explicit at the same time, what was subjective was mistaken to be objective and politically the Left supported this.
Pope Benedict still interprets speculative and hypothetical cases of being saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as being objective people saved outside the Church. So he interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. He also pusts aside the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
He interprets unknown cases as being known and then the conclusion he calls ' a development'.This is an objective and factual mistake and the only development.He intentionally creates what he terms the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
In 1965 no one corrected Pope Paul VI and told him that there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX.
Similarly Lumen Gentium does not contradict Unam Sanctam on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Vatican Council II does not contradict the ecclesiology of St.Robert Bellarmine.
There is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So
we have Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and
the dogma EENS saying the Church has an exclusiveness and superiority in
salvation. It has an ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. Like the Magisterium
and missionaries of the 16th century it is saying outside the Church
there is no salvation.This is the Conciliar Church which is not referenced in articles and books on Vatican Council II.
We need to start intepreting Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception to the blue. 1
-Lionel Andrades
1
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who
wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there
is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ,
who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation
in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known
by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and
into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express
language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the
same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by
baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware
that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still
do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God
in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to
find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a
necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred
duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always
retains its power and necessity.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
TERMS CLARIFIED
BOD(
Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the
baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved
and now in Heaven)
BOB (Baptism of Blood. The case of unknown person who is in Heaven as a martyr without the baptism of water)
I.I (Invincible
ignorance: The case of an unknown non Catholics who is in Heaven
without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.)
LG
8 ( Lumen Gentium 8: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth' or where the true
Church of Christ allegedly subsists.
LG 14 (Lumen Gentium 14: Baptism of Desire . Case of the unknown cathechumen who desires the
baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is allegedly saved
and now in Heaven)
LG
16 ( Lumen Gentium 16: The case of the unknown person saved outside the
Church in invincible ignorance and who is now in Heaven without faith
and the baptism of water)
UR
3 (Unitatitis Redintigratiio 3, Vatican Council II : The case of the
unknown Christian, who is saved in his religions without Catholic faith
or the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and is allegedly known to
someone on earth who has seen him or her in Heaven).
NA
2( Nostra Aetate 2: The case of the unknown non Catholic saved outside
the Catholic Church without faith and baptism. He or she is saved with
good and holy things in other religion or with the a ray of that Truth
which enlightens all mankind.
GS
22 (Gaudium et Specs 22. The case of the unknown non Catholic who is
saved outside the Catholic Church. He or she is saved without faith and
baptism but with goodwill.
Pope Benedict needs to admit that there is a fundamental mistake in
Vatican Council II and he was part of it, he contributed to it at
Vatican Council II and in the years that followed.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-benedict-needs-to-admit-that-there.html
Pope
Benedict should apologize before he dies. He needs to admit that he
made a mistake. He wrongly assumed BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc were
exceptions to EENS. Then upon this irrationality he created a New
Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology and New Evangelisation and
changed Canon Law to support the error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-benedict-should-apologize-before.html
Pope
Francis follows Pope Benedict's error in the interpretation of Vatican
Council II. He needs to correct it. They both need to apologize for the
mistake.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-francis-follows-pope-benedicts.html
There are no arguements to support exceptions to EENS. There cannot be any objective exception, whatever is the argument
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/there-are-no-exceptions-to-support.html
A
Catholic can interpret Vatican Council in harmony with the past
exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of
Errors or/and he can also reject the Council since it has an objective
error, which cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.The error the periti
made was to assume there were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus(EENS) and then they placed 'the exceptions' in the text of
the Council.
So Massimo Faggioli can no more interpret Vatican Council II as a
rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabusof Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/so-massimo-faggioli-can-no-more.html
Michael
Sean Winters affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since if asked he would say that the baptism
of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible
ignorance(I.I) and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and
not visible people in 2019. So they are not practical exceptions to the
past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and exclusive salvation in the
Catholic Church. I have sent him e-mails of these posts and there is no
contradiction from him.
Michael
Sean Winters affirms Vatican Council II and also the strict
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the Council
supports Feeneyite EENS when it is interpreted rationally.The Council is
Feeneyite.He agrees with me.When he supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS
he is not in schism since the Council does the same when interpreted
rationally. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-affirms-vatican.html
Masimo Faggioli, Michael Sean
Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of
Feeneyism and justify so many changes in the Church
Massimo
Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with
Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by
Pope Paul VI. They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with
Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by
Pope John XXIII https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-and-michael-sean.html
Massimo
Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy
when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of
the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican
Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam
nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general
rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a
philosophy and theology
Hilary
White and Massimo Faggioli interpret the Catechism, Vatican Council II
and Letter of the Holy Office with hypothetical cases not being
hypothetical : so there is a rupture with Tradition (with graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/hilary-white-and-massimo-faggioli.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/at-oxford-university-england-professors.html
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council
II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with
Catholic Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-oxford-university-press-has.html
Such
a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on
Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be
thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei,
Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle
of Non Contradiction.
The
16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the
Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the
laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD),
baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)
referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new
false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial
but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and
objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html
When I say that the baptism of desire
(BOD), Baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are not
objective people in 2019, I refer to physics. Physics refers to
stationary and moving bodies, acceleration,gravity, force etc.According
to Newton's Laws of Physics we humans cannot see someone saved outside
the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-i-say-that-baptism-of-desire-bod.html
BOD, BOB and I.I and EENS and LG 8, UR 3,
NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2019.
They are not objective people in the present times.This is a reality
every rational adult and professional has to accept. This is the
objective understanding of a reality shared by people in general. So if a
professional denies it, something is wrong.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bod-bob-and-ii-and-eens-bod-bob-and-ii.html
Repost : Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/repost-books-to-avoid-fenton-and.html
Posts
