Friday, September 20, 2013

Video Omo-matrix (reloaded) : La proposta di legge cd. Scalfarotto-Leone intende inserire nell'articolo 3 della legge 13 ottobre 1975, n. 654,




Pubblicato in data 10/set/2013
La proposta di legge cd. Scalfarotto-Leone intende inserire nell'articolo 3 della legge 13 ottobre 1975, n. 654, la seguente norma:
«È vietata ogni organizzazione, associazione, movimento o gruppo avente tra i propri scopi l'incitamento alla discriminazione ... per motivi fondati sull'omofobia o transfobia»

inoltre intende inserire nell'art. 1 del decreto legge 26 aprile 1993, n. 122 la seguente norma:
«è punito con la reclusione sino a 3 anni chi diffonde in qualsiasi modo idee fondate sull'omofobia o transfobia».

Tutto ciò senza dare la minima spiegazione sul significato e i limiti delle parole
DISCRIMINAZIONE, OMOFOBIA, TRANS-FOBIA.
La proposta pretende di vietare per legge un comportamento senza darne una descrizione o una definizione.
Ciò apre la porta ad innumerevoli abusi di potere.

P.S. una versione alternativa di questo video (senza musica di sottofondo) si vede qui
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JhPo...
 
Il Cammino dei Tre Sentieri segnala ai suoi amici un interessante video a proposito della legge liberticida contro l'omofobia di cui si sta discutendo in Parlamento http://itresentieri.it/

USCCB makes a mistake and Michael Voris does not notice

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops(USCCB) made a mistake in the Notification on Father Peter C.Phan. They  assumed that those persons saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are exceptions to everyone needing to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. These cases are probabilities but can never be exceptions.


The same error is repeated by the USCCB in the interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257). They use Cushingism in the interpretation.They have removed the Notification from the Internet. However their interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is available for review.
The U.S dioceses are also repeating the same mistake. This was the error of the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing, in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 supported Fr.Leonard Feeney when it referred to 'the dogma' , the 'infallible teaching'.While implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to 'the infallible teaching'. They are not relevant to 'the dogma' since these cases are invisible for us and known only to God.
 
'Zero cases of something are not exceptions ,' says the American apologist John Martigioni (1). The American, Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson (2) agrees with Martigioni and says there are no known exceptions, in the present times, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or  Ad Gentes7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. This is an important point which was ignored in a discussion between Michael Voris and Patrick Archbold on the need for Muslims to convert.Neither of them mentioned AG 7 and LG 14, in Vatican Council II, refers to also Muslims. Muslims need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water to go to Heaven and avoid Hell ( for salvation) and- there are no known exceptions to this teaching mentioned in AG 7, LG 14 or any text of Vatican Councl II. Vatican Council II is traditional.It agrees with Michael Voris' position on other religions and Christians communities. All  need Catholic faith (AG 7) , which includes the Sacraments and the faith and moral teachings of the Church.They need to accept the pope as the Vicar of Christ and interpret the Gospel according to Tradition in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has the 'fullnes of truth' and is the only way to avoid the fires of Hell.
 
Michael Voris could mention that LG 14 and AG 7 indicate all Christians need Catholic Faith for salvation. Also all non Catholic religions need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation (AG 7). So Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism (there are no visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus) is in agreement with Tradition and contrary to modernism.
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links