Wednesday, October 1, 2014

All the Cardinals and Bishops at the Synod on the family in their catechesis will use the irrational right hand column in the intepretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church

The pope in his catechesis today morning speaks of the necessity of the Church, the necessity  of belonging to the hierarchical church.However the hierarchical church uses an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents including Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.The pope himself rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and  calls it triumphalism. This is heresy.
 
He also interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise which makes the Council a break with Tradition. This was not part of the hierarchical Catholic Church before 1949.
 
All the Cardinals and Bishops at the Synod on the Family this month, in their catechesis in Catholic families, will probably use the irrational  right hand column in the intepretation of of magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II .
 
The pope and the cardinals at the Synod  want the  Society of St.Pius X and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand column (just as they do).The  left hand column is a rational choice which they ignore. The pope wants them to  interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past,  with Cushingism  and with the right hand column.
The hierarchical Church at this month's Synod on the Family will teach Catholics that   'God is not bound to the Sacraments'' for salvation (CCC 1257). The cardinals believe that this is a reference to a real, visible exception.This is irrational.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus instead  tells us that God has chosen to make salvation limited to the Sacraments.Can ghosts be exceptions for the cardinals ?
 
The Hierarchical Church considers CCC 1258-60 as  exceptions to all needing the baptism of water.They are substitutes for the baptism of water.Even when we do not know any such case in real life(2014) they are substitutes.
 
No  magisterial text before the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 claims that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus yet this error is accepted and taught by the cardinals who will attend the Synod.
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN      or RIGHT HAND COLUMN
 
implicit                                                             or explicit for us.
hypothetical                                                     or known in reality.
invisible                                                           or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle)                                        or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective                                                         or objective.

So families, parents, cathechists,can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts itself. LG 16 ( invincible ignorance is an exception to all needing to convert) is contradicted by Ad Gentes 7, which says all need to convert into the Catholic Church.

If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict itself. LG 16 does not contradict AG 7 and LG 14.


The cardinals and the pope could use the left hand side column but they do not.
In family catechesis the irrational concept of VISIBLE exceptions is used in general by the cardinals who will participate in the Synod.The dead are visible.
Then they say that every one needs to enter the Catholic Church except for those in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. In other words these cases are VISIBLE to us in real life.So they are exceptions. We know cases in 2014 saved with the baptism of desire etc .The cardinals can name them! So they become exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Then the cardinals and bishops  say every person does not need to enter the Church and all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. What has all who are saved, are saved through Jesus and the Church, have to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Again it is inferred subtly that there are known cases saved without the baptism of water in other religions. They are VISIBLE to us . So all do not need to enter the Church for salvation.

Whenever someone says there are exceptions he is implying that there are VISIBLE exceptions.
They say Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for denying the baptism of desire. In other words, he would not accept a VISIBLE baptism of desire.


The cardinals and bishop say, along with the political left, that  Nostra Aetate 2 is a revolution in the Catholic Church since it contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. A person can be saved without the baptism of water and with ' a ray of the Truth' . In other words ' a ray of the Truth' is a VISIBLE exception.If it was not VISIBLE it would obviously not be an exception.

Similarly for them Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Vatican Council II  has changed the Catholic Church's teachings on ecumenism. Now a Protestant can be saved in 'imperfect communion with the Church'. For them,  these cases are VISIBLE in the present times, we can name some one saved in imperfect communion with the Church.

This is the doctrinal error with which the cardinals and bishops will come to the Synod.It is  an error  the popes overlook and consider being part of the hierarchical church.-Lionel Andrades



All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF keeps hidden

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-s.html#links









 

All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF keeps hidden



Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II while affirming that to obtain eternal salvation, 'it is not always necessary to  be incorporated into the Church actually as a member', but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949) while the 2012 General Chapter Statement of the SSPX says the contrary,' 'we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation'. Every one needs to be incorporated in the Church for eternal salvation and there are no exceptions in 2014.
Cardinal Ladaria wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with Cushingism ( the dead in Heaven are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus) while he will reject  Feeneyism (LG 16 is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
He wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality, while a rational interpretation, an alternative, is available for them and he will not make it known.
The cardinal wants the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand column when the left hand column is a rational choice.1
He wants to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past, without the hermeneutic of continuity, but with  Cushingism,  the  irrational inference and with the right hand column.
He wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II as ambigous when without the irrationality the Council is not ambigous and affirms the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.
There is a choice available for the SSPX. Vatican Council II is traditional on other religions and Christians communities when Cushingism is avoided in the interpretation and Feeneyism is used.

ARE THE DEAD VISIBLE AT THE CDF
The dead are not visible on earth. This is a fundamental principle the SSPX must remember.Ask the CDF to clarify this. Are the deceased now in Heaven visible on earth to us on earth for the CDF? Then how can there be exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus? And if there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II how can the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities have changed ? If there are no exceptions to the dogma how can Cardinal Ladaria on the ITC papers, put forward a theology of religion and a new ecclesiology ? If there is no known salvation outside the Church why should the ' old ecclesiology be rejected?Is not Vatican Council  II traditional?
How can the Letter of the Holy Office say 'be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. Who can name an exception in 2014 ?
How can the Catechism of the Catholic Church in 1257 say 'God is not bound to the Sacraments'. Why does the Catechism mention this irrationality i.e why does it infer that there are known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation and so God is not limited to the Sacraments..Vatican Council II does not make this claim in its text.Catholics are  misled by the line 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' as referring to real, visible exceptions.This is irrational.The dogma tells us that God has chosen to make salvation limited to the Sacraments.

CCC 1257 WRONG INFERENCE


CCC 1257  implies that there is known salvation outside the Church and so God is not limited to the Sacraments.It implies that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (CCC 1258-1260) are visible in the flesh in 2014, for them to be exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. 
 Then CCC 1258,1259,1260 assumes that these hypothetical cases are known exceptions to CCC 1257 which also says 'the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water'.It is common knowledge that we cannot see the dead who are in Heaven. CCC 1257-1260 infers that we can!There are defacto exceptions!?.
'God is not limited to the Sacraments' refers to an exception to CCC 1257 itself, which also says that the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water.CCC 1257 contradicts itself.
CCC 1258-60 are also considered exceptions to all needing the baptism of water in other words they are substitutes for the baptism of water.Even when we do not know any such case in real life(2014) they are substitutes ?.The text says they are equivalent to the Sacrament of baptism.We cannot administer the baptism of desire or blood in 2014.These are implicit for us cases which the Catechism infers are explicit for us. Then it is postulated that these 'explicit for cases' are 'exceptions' to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. They are substitutes!?
This is false since we do not know any person in 2014 who is an exception/substitute  to all needing the baptism of water.

It is false since no magisterial text before the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 claims that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

NO NEW REVELATION IN THE CHURCH


So how can it be said God is not limited to the sacraments when there is no New Revelation in the Catholic Church to contradict the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It is wrong since it would contradict Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism itself (846,1257).
It contradicts St.Thomas Aquinas who says the baptism of water is always needed for salvation.He never claimed that there were known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
All this must be clarified by the SSPX before they sign a doctrinal preamble.This is major doctrinal error in the Catholic Church which the CDF is  keeping hidden.
-Lionel Andrades

 
1.

Ecclesiastical blackmail?