Monday, October 7, 2013

Pope Francis is interpreting magisterial documents with an objective error : he is using a dead man walking and visible theory

Here is the magisterial text in which he uses an irrational premise.(1)
He is not the first Jesuit to do so. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Secretary, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J precedes him.(2)On the other hand there are Catholic priests who have avoided these doctrinal errors (3).
Based on this factual error the Jesuits have opened a new department at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome.(4)
Oops! Funny Pictures! (66 pics)
Pope Francis is not being corrected by cardinals, traditionalists or the secular media.
Since he assumes that the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are visible to us on earth he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The rejection of this defined dogma is also a rejection of the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra.
Pope Francis rejects the dogma outside the church there is no salvation and calls it 'triumphalism'.
He can meet on earth a practising homosexual who will not be going to Hell so he asks , 'who am I to judge?' ?.
He personally knows and can name an atheist who is saved or is going to be saved so he believes that an atheist does not have to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
He has been using this irrationality of the visible- dead theory as a professor of theology in Buenos Aires.
If he did not use the visible to us dead-saved theory then Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 would be supporting the priest from Boston, Fr.Leonard Feeney, who said there are no visible to us exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Jesuits dismissed him from their religious order and have still not apologised for this injustice.
It's an objective fact that we cannot see the dead. The pope suggests that we all can do so!
Our pope has made a mistake!
-Lionel Andrades
Feast or Our Lady of the Rosary.
 
1.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel...-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
 CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"


846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
 

2.

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J uses the false premise : here is the proof! 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-uses-false.html#links

3.
LEGIONARY OF CHRIST PRIEST FR.RAFAEL PASCUAL AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/10/legionary-of-christ-priest-frrafael.html
CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P
BRAZILIAN PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
4.
According to the Rector of the Gregorian University Rome, Fr.François-Xavier Dumortier all religions are equal paths to salvation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/according-to-rector-of-gregorian.html#links