The issue is Vatican
Council II. Everyone is being forced to accept Vatican Council II (Irrational).
People must object. Vatican Council II (Rational) is in harmony with 16th
century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
and the exclusivist theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
CARDINAL CUPICH MUST USE THE RATIONAL PREMISE
Catholics in Chicago
must ask Cardinal Blaise Cupich to interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational
Premise. They must refuse to interpret the Council with an Irrational Premise.
Traditionis Custode must be interpreted rationally.
Similarly in Germany, the
bishops must interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise. The German
Ministry of Education must not allow the German bishops to use the Irrational Premise
and teach it to students. This is unethical and not Catholic.
No Catholic saint is a
heretic if he mentions the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
Hypothetical cases cannot be practical exceptions for the traditional strict
interpretation of EENS. So BOD and I.I do not contradict the dogma EENS. They are compatible. We can affirm both BOD and I.I and also the dogma EENS.It does not have to be either-or.
Those who say that BOD
and I.I are exceptions for EENS imply that there are visible cases of BOD. So
their premise ; visible cases of invisible BOD would be wrong. BOD and I.I are always invisible for us. How can they be visible exceptions for EENS etc ?
LIBERALISM IN THE UNIVERSITIES COME FROM THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The Catholic
universities get their liberalism from the false interpretation of Vatican
Council II with an Irrational Premise. They are forced to do this by the Left.
Scott Hahn and the other professors of theology in the Department of Theology
at the University of Steubenville, Ohio, USA have no denial.
A mortal sin is a mortal
sin says Pope John Paul II in the encyclical on morals, Veritatis Splendor. A
couple in public adultery or divorce are in mortal sin and on the way to Hell.
If there are mitigating factors which prevent them from going to Hell they
would only be known to God.
The norm for salvation
is faith and baptism and living a virtuous life. The norm is not adultery and
concubinage.When an unmarried couple live together, it is a scandal, a sin.
Divorce and re-marriage are mortal sins. Vatican Council II (Rational) does not
contradict the old faith and morals of the Church.
MAINLINE CHURCH IN FUTURE HAS TO BE TRADITIONAL
We can wait for the
future when the main line Novus Ordo Church choose to interpret Vatican
Council II only rationally. Then they all will have to come back to Tradition,
to the Roman Missal.
I agree with the Most
Holy Family Monastery, USA on EENS. I also agree with them when they say that the
baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not exceptions for EENS. I agree with Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall. There are no
literal cases of the baptism of desire.
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE AND THEN CONTRADICT TRADITION.
I was in two seminaries
in Rome. For me Vatican Council II would not be an exception for Feeneyite
EENS and the dogma EENS. At the seminaries they would interpret EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the
Athanasius Creed with exceptions. They were Cushingite and I was
Feeneyite.Cushingism changes the interpretation of the Creeds.
I held the strict interpretation of EENS like the saints but the Legion of Christ seminary in Rome (PIMME) projected Vatican Council II (Irrational) as having exceptions for EENS.
It was the same problem with the British seminary in Rome (Beda College) in 2002-2003.They are still doing the same thing. No one objects since it is the same mistake of the Lefebvrists,Thucs and liberals.
Pope Benedict even today
is not announcing that LG 8, 14 and 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to
hypothetical cases.So the Council does not contradict traditional
mission, faith and morals and the Roman Missal.
We can accept the BOD
and I.I as existing only in our mind, a thought. There are no objective cases. Outside
the Church there is no salvation says the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846.
St. Robert Bellarmine
affirmed Feeneyite EENS and not Cushingite EENS. Bishop Donald Sanborn and the
Lefebvrists, affirm Cushingite EENS and so change the salvation dogma. They create
exceptions by using the False Premise (Cushingism) to interpret BOD and I.I.
So if Feeneyites are
considered heretics then so would be St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis Xavier, St.
Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, St. Anthony Mary Claret, St. Maximillian Kolbe…They
were all affirming the strict interpretation of EENS with hypothetical baptism
of desire etc.
ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON MUST ENFORCE TRADITIONIS CUSTODE INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL RATIONALLY
Now when the Archdiocese
of Washington, USA want to enforce Traditionis Custode it is flawed.Since they
choose Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational Premise.This creates alleged practical exceptions for EENS (Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors (
Feeneyite).With the False Premise used in public, a false rupture is created
with the theology of the pre-1962 Roman Missal.
Catholics have an obligation in Washington, Savvanh and Chicago to interpret
Vatican Council II rationally.
Feeneyism is the traditional teaching of the
Catholic Church. It is EENS, as held by the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th
century. It is not contradicted by Vatican Council II (Rational). Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, always, refer to hypothetical cases only. -Lionel Andrades
LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN OF THIS BLOG. CLICK TO ACCESS
- Feeneyism (112)
- Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
- Feeneyism on Wikipedia (14)
- Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
- Feeneyismo (10)
- Feeneyite can also affirm CCC 847-848. (2)
- Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995 (2)
- Feeneyite Catholic Church (1)
- Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
- Feeneyite EENS (2)
- Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) (6)
- Feeneyite or Lefebvrist traditionalist (1)
- Feeneyite popes (1)
- Feeneyite Theology (2)
- Feeneyite Tradition (1)
- Feeneyite Vatican Council II (2)
- Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (2)
- Feeneyites (4)
- Feeneyites accept hypothetical baptism of desire (1)
- Feeneyites accept Vatican Council II (1)
- Feeneyites do not reject the Batptism of Desire (1)
- Feeneyites were always correct (1)
- Cushing Additions (2)
- Cushing heresy (5)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II (25)
- Cushingism (122)
- Cushingism and the Catholic popes (9)
- Cushingism at Vatican Council II (1)
- Cushingism in Vatican Council II (19)
- Cushingism is irrational (1)
- Cushingism is the source of other heresies in the Catholic Church (1)
- Cushingism. (1)
- Cushingismo (6)
- Cushingite (3)
- Cushingite Bishops (1)
- Cushingite examples (1)
- Cushingite Franciscan supports the innovation (1)
- Cushingite homilies (1)
- Cushingite passages cannot be exceptions to EENS (3)
- Cushingite popes (1)
- Cushingite propaganda on the Internet (1)
- Cushingite Theology (6)
- Cushingite theology of Rahner and Ratzinger (1)
- Cushingite theology of sedevacantist seminaries (4)
- Cushingite theology of SSPX seminaries (2)
- Cushingite traditionalists (1)
- Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
- Cushingite's strange doctrines (1)
- Cushingites (1)
- Cushingites must make the correction (1)
Posts
