Today all the Jesuits at the 28 Jesuit Universities in the USA must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, like the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. Since there are no practical exceptions to EENS. Vatican Council II can refer to only theoretical and hypothetical cases( LG 8, LG 16 etc ). -Lionel Andrades
Monday, October 26, 2020
Education and the Human Person in the Jesuit Tradition : Today all the Jesuits at the 28 Jesuit Universities in the USA must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, like the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. Since there are no practical exceptions to EENS. Vatican Council II can refer to only theoretical and hypothetical cases( LG 8, LG 16 etc )
When someone says that we do not need traditional Mission as in the past - remember that he is a Cushingite.He is reading Vatican Council II wrongly. If someone says that we cannot proclaim the Kingship of Jesus Christ in all politics any more - remember he is a Cushingite.He is reading Vatican Council II irrationally. The Council supports the proclamation of EENS in Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and there are no exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church mentioned in Vatican Council II.So we need to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King to save souls. We have to look at the text of Vatican Council II, differently. Re-interpret Vatican Council II
When someone says that we do not need traditional Mission as in the past - remember that he is a Cushingite.He is reading Vatican Council II wrongly.
If someone says that we cannot proclaim the Kingship of Jesus Christ in all politics any more - remember he is a Cushingite.He is reading Vatican Council II irrationally.
The Council supports the proclamation of EENS in Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and there are no exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church mentioned in Vatican Council II.So we need to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King to save souls.
We have to look at the text of Vatican Council II, differently. Re-interpret Vatican Council II.- Lionel Andrades
The problem is not Vatican Council II. The problem is the present two popes and the Masons who are maintaining the false narrative on Vatican Council II and are not educating Catholics on how to interpret the Council in harmony with EENS and exclusive salvation as it was known to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages
The problem is not Vatican Council II. The problem is the present two popes and the Masons who are maintaining the false narrative on Vatican Council II and are not educating Catholics on how to interpret the Council in harmony with EENS and exclusive salvation as it was known to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.-Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke can now affirm the strict interpretation of EENS since he does not know of any exceptions in 2020 and Magisterial texts do not mention any. They only refer to hypothetical cases.So LG 8, LG 14 ( baptism of desire), LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) are not examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke can now affirm the strict interpretation of EENS since he does not know of any exceptions in 2020 and Magisterial texts do not mention any. They only refer to hypothetical cases.So LG 8, LG 14( baptism of desire), LG 16( invincible ignorance) are not examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades
Fr.Leonard Feeney held the strict interpretation of EENS since the false premise used in the LOHO and Vatican Council II were not objective exceptions
Fr.Leonard Feeney held the strict interpretation of EENS since the false premise used in the LOHO and Vatican Council II were not objective exceptions. -Lionel Andrades
Jim Russell interprets Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) with the false premise, accepts the non traditional Cushingite conclusion and then criticizes Fr. Leonard Feeney for not using the fake premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
Jim Russell interprets Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) with the false premise, accepts the non traditional Cushingite conclusion and then criticizes Fr. Leonard Feeney for not using the fake premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). He refers to 'The Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney'.Those who do not use the false premise and inference in Catholic theology are considered 'strange' and Church Militant TV supports him. -Lionel Andrades
Today all Catholics can affirm the strict intepretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the false premise commonly used in the interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance and Magisterial documents( Creeds and Catechisms)cannot be practical exceptions to EENS
Today all Catholics can affirm the strict intepretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the false premise commonly used in the interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance and Magisterial documents( Creeds and Catechisms)cannot be practical exceptions to EENS. -Lionel Andrades
The Franciscans of the Immaculate were and are Cushingites, like the SSPX and the liberal popes.Liberals and traditionalists are infected with Cushingism. It creates the liberal/traditionalist divide with the false premise.Both groups are stuck in a false groove, a false way of reasoning
The Franciscans of the Immaculate were and are Cushingites, like the SSPX and the liberal popes. Liberals and traditionalists are infected with Cushingism. It creates the liberal/traditionalist divide with the false premise.Both groups are stuck in a false groove, a false way of reasoning.
Cushingism cuts across the traditionalist-liberal divide it affects both groups. It makes the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and Tradition in general obsolete.
-Lionel Andrades
Without Cushingism, Bishop Marcello Semarero, now cardinal-elect, cannot be a liberal. But since the SSPX priests at Albano, Italy, in his diocese, are Cushingites, he gets away with it
Without Cushingism, Bishop Marcello Semarero, now cardinal-elect, cannot be a liberal. But since the SSPX priests at Albano, Italy, in his diocese, are Cushingites, he gets away with it. -Lionel Andrades
When Pope Benedict said in 2016 (Avvenire) that extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century he went un-noticed because of the common Cushingite ignorance among the people.No one objected. He referred to a development of doctrine with Vatican Council II.As a Cushingite he meant, a development with the use of a false premise. Nobody objected.Since it was not known that Vatican Council could be interpreted without the false premise and he was not going to tell anyone
When Pope Benedict said in 2016(Avvenire) that extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century he went un-noticed because of the common Cushingite ignorance among the people.No one objected. He referred to a development of doctrine with Vatican Council II.As a Cushingite he meant, a development with the use of a false premise. Nobody objected.Since it was not known that Vatican Council could be interpreted without the false premise and he was not going to tell any one.-Lionel Andrades
When it is said that Vatican Council II has not brought any thing new then there is a Feeneyite reading of Vatican Council II but if it is said that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), then this is a Cushingite reading of Vatican Council II. The Council has brought something new. It contradicts exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, with the use of a false premise.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are seen as objective exceptions to EENS and for example, the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q, 27Q)
When it is said that Vatican Council II has not brought any thing new then there is a Feeneyite reading of Vatican Council II but if it is said that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), then this is a Cushingite reading of Vatican Council II. The Council has brought something new. It contradicts exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, with the use of a false premise.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are seen as objective exceptions to EENS and for example, the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q, 27Q). Since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism he rejected the Council because of its non traditional conclusion.With Cushingism there had to be a non traditional conclusion. He did not knowof a rational choice which was available. The Bologna School of Alberto Melloni and the present two popes and those from Paul VI all interpreted Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingite reasoning.-Lionel Andrades
When there is a reference to Fr. .Karl Rahner's Anonymous Christian know that an Anonymous Christian does not exist in our reality. We cannot see or meet someone saved outside the Catholic Church.We cannot see someone who will be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). There can be no known exceptions for us human beings to the Athanasius Creed which states all need Catholic Faith for salvation. For Cushingites, who reason irrationally, there are Anonymous Christians, saved outside the Catholic Church.For Feeneyites there are obviously no known people saved outside Church, for example in 1965-2020. Only God would know if there was someone saved outside the Church
When there is a reference to Fr. .Karl Rahner's Anonymous Christian know that an Anonymous Christian does not exist in our reality. We cannot see or meet someone saved outside the Catholic Church.We cannot see someone who will be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). There can be no known exceptions for us human beings to the Athanasius Creed which states all need Catholic Faith for salvation.
For Cushingites, who reason irrationally, there are Anonymous Christians, saved outside the Catholic Church.For Feeneyites there are obviously no known people saved outside Church, for example in 1965-2020. Only God would know if there was someone saved outside the Church. -Lionel Andrades
When it is said ,"Why should there be traditional Catholic mission any more when Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church ?" be alert. Vatican Council II does not say this. It has to be implied, wrongly, that Vatican Council II states this
When it is said ,"Why should there be traditional Catholic mission any more when Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church ?" be alert. Vatican Council II does not say this. It has to be implied, wrongly, that Vatican Council II states this.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only but in general it is assumed there are objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the church. -Lionel Andrades
When it is said 'Why should there be traditonal mission or the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, when there is salvation(known) outside the Church?' - the Lefebrists cannot respond.Since with Cushingism, they use the false premise and so they believe there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church
When it is said 'Why should there be traditonal mission or the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, when there is salvation(known) outside the Church?' - the Lefebrists cannot respond.Since with Cushingism, they use the false premise and so they believe there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church.
But for a Feeneyite there are no visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So we still affirm - that all non Catholics in general are on the way to Hell without faith and baptism (AG 7) and so Jesus Christ in the Catholic Church needs to be the center of all politics, for the maximum saving of souls from going to Hell. -Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
