Fr. John Hardon sj
was a good apologist but he did not know there was a mistake in the 1949 Letter of
the Holy Office (LOHO). The same mistake was carried over into Vatican Council
II. Even Fr. William Most was a good apologist but he interpreted Vatican
Council II with the LOHO mistake. No one corrected them.
Liberal and
conservative Catholics, followed their mistake,
with no correction from Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani and Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith ( now
DDF).
Pope Pius XII confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS and the CDF (Holy Office) did not correct him. It was Cardinal Richard Cushing the Archbishop of Boston who was wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston who was correct.
Then it is the DDF
which is wrong when it chooses a false premise, false inference and non-traditional
conclusion and it is the religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate
Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, NH who are correct, when they choose a rational premise and inference with the traditional conclusion.
The SBC was always
correct on EENS and so was Brother Thomas Augustine micm, the Superior of the
St. Benedict Center, Still River, MA. Also Brother Peter Dimond apologist at
the Most Holy Family Monastery, New York was also correct on EENS. But Thomas
Augustine and Peter Dimond were still interpreting Vatican Council II
irrationally though they were correct on EENS.
Brother Thomas Augustine
and Brother Peter Dimond must clarify that LG 8, 14, 15 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS
22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases in 2023. So they
are not exceptions for Feenyite EENS.
So it is not enough to be a Feeneyite on EENS. Vatican Council II has to also be interpreted rationally. The Council is Feeneyite. It is in harmony and not a rupture with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
Brothers Peter and
Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery are Cushingites on Vatican
Council II and Feeneyite on EENS. It has been the same for Brother Thomas
Augustine micm.
21 CARDINALS ARE CUSHINGITE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS
The 21 cardinals who
will be appointed next month by Pope Francis are Cushingite on EENS
and Vatican Council II. I am Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS.
The 18 of these
cardinals who are papal electors must be Feeneyite on EENS and Vatican Council
II. This is being honest and traditional. With Cushingism they are unethical
and are non traditional, heretical and schismatic. Cushingism is dishonest. Cushingites cannot morally be papal electors.
The SSPX are also
Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS but unlike the cardinals the SSPX rejects
Vatican Council II (irrational), which is an obvious break with Tradition. It
has exceptions for EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc.
Even the Franciscans
of the Immaculate of Fr. Stefano Mannelli ffi, goes back to Tradition without
Vatican Council II ( ir-rational) but also with without Vatican Council II (
rational).
POPE FRANCIS WAS CUSHINGITE WHEN HE CLOSED THE ROME SEMINARIES
Pope Francis was
Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS when he closed down the Franciscans
of the Immaculate and Russicum seminaries in Rome. No one corrected him on his interpretation
of Vatican Council(irrational). He expects all seminarians to also be irrational.
He issued Amoris
Laetitia, the Abu Dhabi Declaration and Traditionis Custode based upon
Cushingism and no one corrected him.
Pope Paul VI was also
Cushingite on EENS and Vatican Council II though he lifted the excommunication
of Fr. Leonard Feeney who was of course, Feeneyite on EENS.
Brother Francis Maluf
micm, was the founding member of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and
Superior of the St. Benedict Center, NH and one of the pioneer leaders of Fr.
Leonard Feeney’s religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
However he did not clarify the position, on Vatican Council II, of Fr. Leonard
Feeney who died in 1978. The St.Benedict Center, NH was interpreting Vatican
Council II with Cushingism, just like the Lefebvrists in general.
CUSHINGITE LEFEBVRE, RAHNER, RATZINGER, KUNG, BALTHAZAR, BEA, OTTAVIANI, CONGAR AND MURRAY ARE NO MORE RELEVANT
Lefebvre, Rahner,
Ratzinger, Kung, Balthazar, Bea, Ottaviani, Congar and Murray were Cushingite
on Vatican Council II and EENS. So they are no more relevant in Catholic theology.
Since now we can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS rationally and there is continuity
with Tradition. Irrespective of what they said and did the Council is
Feeneyite.
The Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary, both groups, were interpreting Vatican Council II
irrationally, like all the religious communities and all the cardinals and bishops
in New England, USA.
Bishop Peter Libasci
and his Curia, in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, are Cushingites on
Vatican Council II and EENS.
Archbishop Victor
Manuel Fernandez like Cardinal Gerhard Muller is Cushingite on Vatican Council
II and EENS and so is the rest of the Dicastery for Doctrine and Faith which
has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center in New
Hampshire, for not interpreting Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic
Church and EENS with Cushingism. -Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 3, 2023
Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is a Cushingite on Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is a disqualification for being a Prefect of the Dicastery for Doctrine and the Faith (DDF). Cushingism is opposed to Catholic doctrine and theology.Even Pope Francis is a Cushingite on Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc). Cushingism cannot be Magisterial.
AUGUST 2, 2023
Apologetics of Lionel Andrades which was not known to Fr. John Hardon sj, Fr. William Most, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
AUGUST 2, 2023
Public mortal sin is not in step with Vatican Council II
AUGUST 2, 2023
Pope Francis and the cardinals choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally in public. This is not permitted by Canon Law ? They must re interpret Church Documents rationally.
AUGUST 1, 2023
How can there be a pope who chooses to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally in public and expects all the cardinals, bishops and priests to do the same?
AUGUST 1, 2023
There are four important points to note before the Synod in October and the ordination of 21 new cardinals in September : we have a discovery
JULY 31, 2023
Pope Francis is not eligible to be pope when he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This is not Magisterial. This is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and contradict the centuries old magisterial teaching.
JULY 31, 2023
Quando il Concilio Vaticano II viene interpretato razionalmente, sono i progressisti/liberali che saranno fuori dalla Chiesa ei cattolici ortodossi al centro. Anche i conservatori come il cardinale Gerhard Muller, che interpretano irrazionalmente il Concilio Vaticano II, saranno fuori dalla Chiesa. I cardinali che oggi sono liberali e che in futuro interpreteranno razionalmente il Concilio, saranno dentro la Chiesa.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/quando-il-concilio-vaticano-ii-viene.html
JULY 31, 2023
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is the progressivist/liberals who will be outside the Church and the orthodox Catholics at the center. Even conservatives like Cardinal Gerhard Muller who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, will be outside the Church.Cardinals who are liberals today and who in future will interpret the Council rationally, will be within the Church.
JULY 30, 2023
The 21 new cardinals in September 2023 are in public heresy and schism. There is no denial from any of them. How can 18 of them be allowed to elect a new pope when they interpret Vatican Council, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally ?
JULY 30, 2023
I 21 nuovi cardinali del settembre 2023 sono in pubblica eresia e scisma. Non c'è smentita da parte di nessuno di loro. Come si può consentire a 18 di loro di eleggere un nuovo papa quando interpretano irrazionalmente il Concilio Vaticano, i Simboli, i Concili ei Catechismi?
JULY 29, 2023
Rorate Caeili and Roberto dei Mattei have posted another report in which they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.
JULY 29, 2023
When Archbishop Carlo Vigano says Vatican Council II should be scrapped, he pleases the liberals. Since he is projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. He is a Cushingite. He is choosing the Irrational Premise (invisible people are visible) and Irrational Inference (invisible cases of LG 16 etc are visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus). So his conclusion is nontraditional (Vatican Council II is a rupture and not a continuity with Tradition).
JULY 29, 2023
Cardinals and bishops and especially the Ecclesia Dei communities must object to the ordination of cardinals in September.These bishops interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to avoid being labeled traditionalists.
JULY 29, 2023
So before the Synod is held communities like the SSPX, FSSP, IKSP and traditional blogs and websites must clarify that they interpret Vatican Council II, with LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as referring to only hypothetical cases. They are not objective exceptions for Tradition. The Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma of EENS of the past Church Councils.
JULY 28, 2023
Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II
TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.
If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.
I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.
The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc irrationally and I am rational.
I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.
The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.
Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com
p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Posts
