It is important to note Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), USA used rational and traditional Feeneyism as a theology to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), a dogma of the Church, while the popes, all the cardinals and all the bishops used irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret EENS.
Feeneyism says invisible cases are invisible, hypothetical cases are hypothetical, the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not objective people saved outside the Catholic Church in 2018 or over the last 50 years.
Cushingism says invisible cases are visible, hypothetical cases are defacto and personally known in the present times, BOD,BOB and I.I refer to objective people saved outside the Church.
The MHFM has rejected BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to EENS and so in this way they emerge Feeneyite. It is the same with the St. Benedict Centers, USA, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.So they are Feeneyite in this sense.
The popes, cardinals and bishops use Cushingism to interpret EENS and they reject a Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.But Cushingism is irrational and creates a hermeneutic of rupture.
So the popes,cardinals and bishops, interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then there is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).
They interpret the Catechisms with Cushingism and so there is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).The Catechisms contradict EENS( Feeneyite).
They have a rational choice. They can interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms with Feeneyism and then there will not be a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).
Similarly they can interpret EENS with Feeneyism i.e invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are simply invisible and they can reject their present Cushingite interpretation of EENS i.e invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. So Peter and Michael Dimond are correct on EENS and the popes, cardinals and bishops are wrong.
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2018
MHFM affirm traditional EENS with Feeneyite theology while the bishops use irrational Cushingism
by Stephen Wynne • ChurchMilitant.com • August 27, 2018
St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church co-opted by homosexualist cabal
SAN DIEGO (ChurchMilitant.com) - Faithful Catholics at St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church (SJE) are suffering persecution by a homosexualist cabal stretching from their parish all the way up to San Diego Bp. Robert McElroy and Los Angeles Abp. José Gomez. The case offers a glimpse into how a homosexual network corrupts institutions at both the parish and diocesan levels.
Recently, Church Militant spoke with parishioner "Adrian Jesson" about the turmoil faithful SJE Catholics have endured under openly gay church staffer Aaron Bianco and homosexualist enablers inside two Southern California chanceries.
Bianco, Jesson explained, wields considerable power owing to his "very close" relationship with Bp. McElroy and his pro-gay auxiliary, John Dolan.
"Everyone in the diocese is scared of Bianco," he said. "They all know that whatever he says, goes, due to his closeness to McElroy and Dolan."
"People sarcastically call him Bp. Aaron," Jesson added.
Bianco once worked as head of young adult ministry at St. Joseph Cathedral, seat of the San Diego diocese. But after the death of Bp. Cirilo Flores in September 2014, cathedral pastor Fr. Patrick Mulcahy dismissed Bianco, reportedly for using "alternate translations of Bible passages to fit an LGBT narrative."
Aaron Bianco, pastoral associate at SJE
Soon after pro-gay San Francisco auxiliary Robert McElroy was consecrated bishop of San Diego in April 2015, Bianco's fortunes began to turn. In June, he secured a position as program outreach associate for Call To Action, a group founded in Detroit that promotes dissident causes like same-sex "marriage" and women's ordination.
At that time, SJE was being pastored by Fr. William Dillard, a faithful priest who upheld Catholic teaching on homosexuality, even leading his parishioners in prayer for the conversion of San Diegans participating in the city's annual gay pride parade.
But in 2016, Fr. Dillard was transferred away from SJE. With Fr. Dillard out of the way, that summer, Bp. McElroy installed Bianco at SJE as "pastoral associate." The activist layman was soon followed by pro-gay priest, Fr. John Dolan.
Auxiliary Bp. John Dolan, former pastor of SJE
Jesson speculates that Fr. Dillard was transferred specifically to make way for Dolan. On Dolan's arrival, he told Church Militant, "Bp. McElroy and Aaron Bianco began grooming Fr. Dolan into becoming the champion of the LGBT community in San Diego."
Under the activist duo's administration, SJE took on a radical new character. As Dolan looked the other way, Bianco launched a propaganda campaign in support of dissident pro-gay group New Ways Ministry (NWM).
Suddenly, posters promoting NWM began popping up on church bulletin boards. Flyers advertising the group's April 2017 symposium "Justice and Mercy Shall Kiss" appeared on vestibule tables. A pamphlet containing abortion information was found lying on a table in the sacristy.
St. John the Evangelist was deemed the main test church in the U.S. to focus on the LGBT community.
Appalled, concerned parishioners — including members of the parish chapter of the Legion of Mary — approached Dolan about his heterodox "pastoral associate."
New Ways Ministry poster on SJE bulletin board
The parishioners questioned Dolan about Bianco's New Ways Ministry promotion; reportedly, Dolan responded by suggesting NWM is "approved by Bishops." In fact, though personally backed by pro-gay bishops like McElroy, New Ways Ministry is not approved by the Holy See; it has been formally condemned by the Vatican for its promotion of homosexuality.
In spite of this, Dolan later participated in "Justice and Mercy Shall Kiss." After learning of their pastor's plans to attend, faithful SJE Catholics confronted Dolan about New Ways Ministry and its gay agenda. But Dolan was dismissive.
"There are bishops that will be there, so it's OK," he told them.
In March 2017, a concerned parishioner wrote a letter expressing her concerns over SJE's direction under Dolan and Bianco. Aware of Bp. McElroy's pro-gay worldview, she sent the letter to Los Angeles Abp. José Gomez, not knowing the official above McElroy is the papal nuncio.
Abortion info left in SJE vestibule
"Lately under our new Pastor, Fr. John Dolan, we welcomed the gay community, a very commendable development, advertising the Church as a Welcoming Parish," she told Abp. Gomez.
But, she continued, "The stance in our SJE Church now is seemingly acceptance without any serious attempt at conversion in the name of mercy."
She noted that "mercy without truth is not mercy, it is not love, it is cruel and an abuse of extreme magnitude, abandoning our brothers and sisters to eternal punishment."
"I have talked to three local priests and they informed me that this is the new thrust of our Diocese," she explained.
Instead of replying to the parishioner or acting on her concerns, Abp. Gomez moved to protect McElroy, Dolan and Bianco; he contacted them to warn them about the letter.
Abp. José Gomez of Los Angeles
Not long after, Bianco confronted the parishioner, saying, "I got that letter you sent to Abp. Gomez! He sent it to me! He's my friend!"
Together, Dolan and Bianco launched a campaign of repression against faithful SJE Catholics, with devotees of the Blessed Mother targeted for special persecution.
Dolan kicked the Legion of Mary out of the parish, alleging its half-dozen members were not enough to justify their meeting on SJE property; meanwhile, Bianco's "LGBT Bible study" group — with fewer members than the Legion of Mary chapter — was allowed to remain.
Dolan also ordered a statue of the Virgin Mary installed by Fr. Dillan (and used for parishioners' house-to-house Rosary chain) to be removed from the church.
Daily Rosary group locked out, praying in SJE parking lot
For his part, Bianco put an end to the Rosary before daily Mass, falsely asserting that parishioners were bothered by it. According to Jesson, those who arrived early for Mass were devotees of the Rosary; they arrived early specifically to pray the Rosary together.
To keep the Rosary group out, Bianco ordered a church volunteer to keep SJE's doors locked until five minutes before daily Mass. Participants asked if they could pray the Rosary in the church cry room, but Bianco refused.
But the Rosary group refused to disband. For weeks, they met every afternoon outside the church to pray. Jesson told Church Militant that Dolan and Bianco "thought the daily Rosary people would go away, but they continuously showed up every day before Mass and prayed the Rosary in the parking lot."
The devotees were not allowed to resume praying inside the church until Dolan's successor was appointed.
Recent revelations by Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, former papal nuncio to the United States, suggest that McElroy (a leading Church liberal), was specially chosen to orchestrate the homosexual infiltration of the San Diego diocese.Tweet
In April 2017, Bp. McElroy promoted Dolan to auxiliary bishop of San Diego.
During Dolan's transition to his new position, Jesson recalled, Bianco "was fully in charge" of SJE, even conducting communion services.
Once Dolan's replacement, Fr. Kevin Casey, arrived at SJE, he noticed daily Rosary devotees praying in the parking lot in the afternoon, and realized that the church doors were locked until just before Mass. Father Casey questioned Bianco about the oddities, and within days, the church was re-opened to the Rosary group.
"Theology on Tap" featuring Fr. James Martin
But Bianco's gay advocacy has continued under Fr. Casey. In March, for example, he organized a "Theology on Tap" event at SJE featuring homosexualist Jesuit Fr. James Martin. The event fell through, but faithful SJE parishioners were nevertheless scandalized.
The McElroy-Dolan-Bianco-Gomez cabal illustrates how the homosexual network infiltrates and operates at the parish level. According to Jesson, he was told by an SJE insider that "St. John the Evangelist was deemed the main test church in the U.S. to focus on the LGBT community."
The case also provides a glimpse into homosexualist maneuverings at the diocesan level and above.
Recent revelations by Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, former papal nuncio to the United States, suggest that McElroy (a leading Church liberal), was specially chosen to orchestrate the homosexual infiltration of the San Diego diocese.
According to Viganò, McElroy's appointment came at the order of Vatican Secretary of State Cdl. Pietro Parolin who, along with Pope Francis and several of his advisors, covered up former Cdl. Theodore McCarrick's history as a serial sexual predator.
Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, former papal nuncio
"The appointment of McElroy in San Diego was also orchestrated from above," Viganò wrote last week, "with an encrypted peremptory order to me as Nuncio, by Cardinal Parolin: 'Reserve the See of San Diego for McElroy'" [emphasis in original].
Once in power, as he quietly corrupted SJE through protégés Dolan and Bianco, McElroy promoted — and protected — the growing gay network in his own diocese and beyond. As Church Militant reported earlier this month, in August 2016, renowned clerical sex abuse investigator Richard Sipe informed McElroy that McCarrick had been sexually abusing young men and minors for decades. The bishop said and did nothing in response to Sipe's warning.
McElroy, Dolan and Bianco remain at their respective posts, cultivating the homosexual network. Faithful Catholics are sounding the alarm that if they remain, San Diego will go the way of Albany, devastated by former Bp. Howard Hubbard and a generation of homosexualist rule.
The Most Holy Family Monastery (MHFM) can choose to remain in sedevacantism citing Pope Francis' position on extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Vatican Council II(Cushingite), I do not know, it is up to them - but they can still change their interpretation of Vatican Council II. They can switch to Feeneyite philosophy and theology.Then they would be rationally affirming Tradition along with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite). Then they are in a position to ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the other traditionalists to do the same.
They must explain the difference between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Feeneyite and why they cannot choose Vatican Council II Cushingite, since, obviously, Vatican Council II( Cushingite) is heretical and a rupture with Tradition.
They could specify that the pope is part of ' the Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) sect' for them and this is not the same as Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), which is traditional.
They could clarify that I, Lionel, do not belong to a Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) sect since I affirm the traditional EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
However for me the MHFM's interpretation of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to known people saved outside the Church.So the Catechism of Pope Pius X on invincible ignorance is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return and outside the Church there is no salvation.It is also a break with the Council of Trent which supports the old ecclesiology which does not mention any known exceptions.Pope Francis and the CDF make this mistake and the MHFM could say that it is heretical.
Then the MHFM is also interpreting the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) with Cushingism and this creates a rupture with my (and their) interpretation of EENS.This would not be acceptable for example, for the Magisterium in the 16th century.
Then there is the issue of the liturgy.They advise Catholics who contact them to attend only the Traditional Latin Mass(TLM) at places they specify.But at every TLM or Novus Ordo Mass today they use Cushingite theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.So there is only the new ecclesiology, which is a rupture with the theology of Mass in the 16th century, for example.The theology of the Mass has been changed today with allegedly visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I and so now even liberal bishops permit the TLM in their diocese.
I personally choose Feeneyism to interpret Magisterial documents and I would ask Rome(Vatican) to come back to the Faith.For me, irrespective of who is the pope, the Church's teachings on faith and morals do not change.
So today Muslims and Jews are still going to Hell with no known exceptions according to Vatican Council II( Ad Gentes 7 - all need faith and baptism for salvation),Catechism of the Catholic Church (1257,845,846),Dominus Iesus (20),CDF Notification on Fr. Jaques Dupuis sj(n.7),Nicene Creed(I believe in (only) one(known) baptism for the forgiveness of sins),The Athanasius Creed( Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly),Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 14411, John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc. So with Feeneyism EENS and Vatican Council II are supported by Tradition.
Practically I cannot see or meet someone saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.So they are not exceptions to EENS for me .They do not contradict the intepretation of EENS according to Peter and Michael Dimond at the MHFM.
I can affirm Vatican Council II(F) and EENS(F),the Catechisms(F) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.The Catholic Church still has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation for me and EENS is today is not a rupture with the missionaries in the 16th century, for me.
So it is not either- or for me. It does not have to be Vatican Council II or EENS.
With Cushingism, the MHFM would have to choose between Vatican Council II and EENS, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and the past ecclesiology.Since with Cushingite BOD,BOB and I.I there are references to 'known' people saved outside the Church.So these so called objective cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and also 'objective cases' of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , GS 22 etc would be a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors( ecumenism of return etc).So I do not have to go into sedevacantism.The popes can come and go. The Catholic Faith does not change for me.-Lionel Andrades
1
" The Church Teaches Ex Cathedra: "The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire "which was prepared for the devil, and his angels," (Mt. 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, almsdeeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church." (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441) ),John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc.
AUGUST 27, 2018
The Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite-without the premise) support the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA
Parts of Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake : the false theology is also there in the new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)
Posts
