Monday, January 29, 2018

So 'the Church' was wrong in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. Similarly at Vatican Council 'the Church' assumed there were known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and 'the Church 'was wrong.

Our Church, the Roman Catholic Church professes that St. Emerentiana IS in Heaven. She is to have died as a Saint while a Catechumen and related to St. Agnes in the 3rd. Century. She was stoned to death. I believe this for it. I certainly do accept this as a matter of fact and Church teaching. ALL people that are in Heaven Are Catholic. If the Catholic Church profesess that a Bob is in Heaven then they are in Heaven.
 Of course there is Bob, Bod and II But they are not for man to pursue.  All people that
are in Heaven are in Heaven ARE Catholic. If the Catholic Church professes that a Bob is in Heaven they most certainly are in Heaven.

Lionel: The Catholic Church can profess that St.Emerentiana is a saint and we accept it.
The Catholic Church cannot profess that St.Emerentiana is in Heaven with the baptism of blood and without the baptism of water.
No one at the time of St.Emerentiana could have seen her in Heaven without the baptism of water.At least the Church does not recognise any one who has this supernatural gift.
Secondly if 'the Church' at the time of St. Emerentiana said that she is in Heaven without the baptism of water then ' the Church' was wrong.It would be just like ' the Church' in 1949, when it was  suggested that there were known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).There were no known cases.So there were no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston. So  'the Church' was wrong in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Similarly at Vatican Council 'the Church' assumed there were known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and 'the Church' was wrong.
There were no visible and known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I.
Similarly if 'the Church' at the time of St.Emerentiana or later, assumed there were physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I then 'the Church' made an objective mistake.Since for us humans there are no such cases.
Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).BOD, BOB and I.I are not relevant to EENS -unless of course someone saw an exception in real life.-Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 29, 2018


St.Emerentiana a possibility - how is she relevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/stemerentiana-possibility-how-is-she.html


St.Emerentiana a possibility - how is she relevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus?


Regarding St.Emerentiana no one could have physically seen her in Heaven with or without the baptism of water.
The Church declares her a saint and martyr O.K we accept it.
Secondly, a saint the past cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in 2018.
This would be irrational reasoning.
Assuming ' for arguments sake ', she is in Heaven without the baptism of water( and she is not according to the dogma EENS) how can someone in the past be a visible exception in the present times  to all needing to be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation?
The person would have to present to be an exception.


Where is the case of someone saved outside the Church in 2018? What is the name of someone who is an exception to EENS because she or he is saved without the baptism of water? Where are the practical exceptions to EENS today?
The dogma is the ordinary means of salvation and it says all need to enter the Church as members for salvation( to avoid Hell), so where are the known exceptions today?
All need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).So according to Vatican Council II the normal means of salvation is not the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, it is faith and baptism.
Jesus says all need the baptism of water for salvation(John 3:5) so how can St. Emerentiana be an exceptioin when no human being could have seen her in Heaven without the baptism of water ?
 If St.Emerentiana came back to earth to be baptised( as it was the experience of saints) it still is a hypothetical case for us human beings. We would not known in real life.So it is not an exception to EENS in 2018.
If God sent an angel to baptise her with water before she died, it still is a hypothetical and theoretical case for us human beings. Since it can only be known to God.
So it still is not an exception to all needing the baptism of  water in the Catholic Church for salvation.
If it is said that it is a possibility that St.Emerentiana could have been saved without the baptism of water since all things are possible with God then it could also be said that it is a possibility that she is in Heaven with the baptism of water since all things are possible with God. A possibility is meaningless. Since it can be said that it is also possibile that there were no baptism of desire and baptism of blood cases during the last 1500 years.
We know that a person in the past cannot be an objective exception to the dogma EENS in the present times.This is something obvious. 
However St.Emerentiana is oftern mentioned. This is the familiar Cushingite reasoning and theology in the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades





____________________________________

JANUARY 27, 2018


What is Feeneyism? (Graphics)

JANUARY 27, 2018


What is Cushingism ?(Graphics)



____________________________________________



DECEMBER 10, 2017


Repost : A St. Emerentina of the past cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS in 2017. This is faulty reasoning

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/repost-st-emerentina-of-past-cannot-be.html



March 15, 2017

And if someone says she is in Heaven without the baptism of water then who is this person in the Church who has said this? Who gave him permission? Is he recognised by the Church?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/and-if-someone-says-she-is-in-heaven.htm



MARCH 16, 2015

Once a traditionalist or sedevacantist has an insight into all this Vatican Council II dramatically changes
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/message-incomplete-we-dont-know-any-one.html


 FEBRUARY 11, 2015


Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets all magisterial documents with Cushingism and offers the Traditional Latin Mass

When Fr.John Zuhlsdorf recites the Nicene Creed he uses Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as a theology.He would do the same while making a Profession of Faith. I have said this many times before and he has not denied it..The important thing in his life is keeping his blog and not being  suspended as a priest. So there will be no denial coming from him.
However discerning Catholics must be aware of the error and avoid it. He has to teach error to keep his blog and his sponsors. This would not be possible if he interprets magisterial documents with traditional Feeneyism.
When he recommends the Catechism of the Catholic Church it will be with the irrational Cushingite interpretation. Cushingism is his philosophy and theology.
When he interprets Vatican Council II like the Bologna School it is with raw Cushingism.At times he supports Vatican Council II and at other times he rejects it but always the interpretation is with the new theology-Cushingism.
Fr.Zuhlsdorf interprets all magisterial documents with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion which is a rupture with Tradition.So he is approved by the Left which controls the Vatican.
The CDF uses Cushingism today while the Jesuits in the Middle Ages only knew Feeneyite philosophy and theology.So the ecclesiology of the Church was traditional and exclusivist.

This is not the ecclesiology of Fr. Zuhlsdorf at the Traditional Latin Mass(TLM).

For Fr.Zuhlsdorf there are visible and known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignornance(I.I).
BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 ( all need the baptism of water for salvation) and Mark 16:16 ( those who do not believe will be condemned).
So he recommends the old Mass with Cushingite theology instead of Feeneyite theology as was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. Since he is a Cushingite and believes there is known salvation outside the Church he approves of inter faith marriages, for them they are not adultery.
With Feeneyite theology the non Catholic spouse would be outside the Church and on the way to Hell.But he is not allowed to say this. The enemies of the Church want to destroy marriage and he cannot protest, if he still wants the good life.
-Lionel Andrades



____________________________________

'Champions of the Rosary'


St Joseph Catholic Church: Rosary Makers
'Champions of the Rosary'

November 22, 2016

Below is an email interview I conducted with Father Donald H. Calloway, MIC, regarding his latest book, Champions of the Rosary. Thanks to Father Calloway for taking the time to answer my questions. Click here to order a copy of the book.



Champions of the Rosary is an impressive work on the powerful private devotion of the rosary. What inspired you to write the book? How long did it take to complete?

Father Calloway
: The world is fraught with immorality and darkness, and in need of being re-evangelized. The story of the rosary needs to be told again in all its wonder for the people of our times. People today need to know about the weapon capable of combating and conquering immorality and evil. I have written Champions of the Rosary for this purpose. Trust me: I know firsthand how the rosary can help a soul convert. Allow me to explain what the rosary did for me years ago.

When I first encountered the rosary, I was a sick man – sick in my heart and sick in my soul. I had been living a very immoral life, to the point where I had to drop out of high school. I was worldly, hedonistic, and without hope of ever changing. My life was so out of control that at the age of 15, I was forcibly removed from the country of Japan due to my criminal activity. (My step-father was a naval officer at the time). After being deported from Japan, my life of crime and sin continued. I did two stints in drug rehabilitation centers in Pennsylvania and was thrown in jail in Louisiana as soon as I turned 18. By the age of 20, I was completely lost and at the point of taking my own life. I was about as far away from God as a person can get. In fact, I hated anything religious, especially anything to do with Jesus and the Catholic Church.

But one night in 1992, I picked up a book that my parents, who had recently converted to Catholicism, had purchased and left on their bookshelf. The book was about a beautiful woman named Mary. It alleged that she was coming from a place called heaven with a message of love, mercy, and conversion. I had no idea who Mary was or what a Marian apparition was, but the message intrigued me, and I stayed up all night reading it. The contents of that book hit my foul soul like a divine two-by-four, so I went to a Catholic church the very next day to find a priest and get some answers. That visit was the first time I had ever been inside a Catholic Church. It was also the first time I encountered the rosary.

It didn't take long before that little 20-minute prayer helped me fall madly in love with Jesus and Catholicism. The rosary helped me turn from a life of sin to a life of freedom. It gave me the courage to surrender my heart, mind, and soul completely to Jesus and his Church. The Virgin Mary and her rosary saved my life!

Skip forward many years, and now I'm a Catholic priest. I continue to pray the rosary every day. It's my daily companion and is always in my pocket. I don't go anywhere without it. This is why I have such a passion for the rosary and why I spent almost three years doing the research and writing necessary for this book. I want everyone to know the power of the rosary!

Could you share a few paragraphs of the book – one of your favorite excerpts, perhaps – with my readers?

Father Calloway
: In 1978, the rosary saved a young woman from being raped and killed by the infamous serial killer Ted Bundy. Responsible for at least 30 brutal and sadistic murders, Ted Bundy was eventually caught and executed by electric chair in 1989. Before his death, he testified to an aspect of one of his killing sprees in Florida that not even he understood.

On the evening of January 15, 1978, Bundy broke into a sorority house at Florida State University in Tallahassee and brutally assaulted and killed several young women. However, one of the women in the house remained completely untouched, even though she had come face-to-face with the killer. When police arrived at the scene of the brutal murders, they found the young woman in a near catatonic state, unwilling to speak to anyone but a priest.

A local priest, Monsignor William Kerr, was called to the scene to speak to the woman. She told him that after Ted Bundy had killed two of her sorority sisters and severely harmed two others, he opened the door to her room, ready to kill her. Oddly, when Bundy opened the door and saw her lying in bed, he dropped his weapon and ran away. The young woman told Monsignor Kerr that before she had gone off to college, she had promised her mother that every night before going to bed, she would pray a rosary for protection. That particular night, she had fallen asleep while praying the rosary. The rosary was in her hand when Bundy opened the door and looked at her.

Incredibly, when Ted Bundy was on death row, he asked for spiritual guidance from Monsignor William Kerr, the same priest that had talked to the young woman on the night of the murders. In the course of their conversation, Bundy informed Monsignor Kerr that he had no idea why he had not killed the young woman. He said that when he had gotten to her room, he had had every intention of killing her, but a mysterious force prevented him from entering the room, and he dropped his weapon and fled. He didn't know it, but that mysterious force was the rosary!
Continued
Praying the Holy Rosary at 18'o clock

Source: www.medjugorje.ws