Linda Hogan, another co-chair of
the network, presented the pope with the network's volume on feminist theology,
titled Feminist Catholic Theological Ethics: Conversations in the
World Church. Hogan co-edited the book with Nigerian Jesuit Fr.
Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator.
In an interview Wednesday, March 22, Hogan, a
professor of ecumenics at Trinity College Dublin, said that in presenting the
books to the pope, her group was hoping to highlight the way it seeks to
promote theologians from various parts of the world.
"The point that we were really making in
presenting the book series was not on the themes themselves, though they're
important, but our modus operandi, which is always having two theologians from
different continents as editors," Hogan said.
https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/francis-talks-feminism-global-moral-theologian-network
The Trinity
College Dublin supports a new ecumenism which is only possible when Vatican
Council II is interpreted with a False Premise to reject the old faith theology
and the old exclusivist ecclesiology, upon which was based the traditional
moral theology of the Catholic Church.This is unethical for Christians of the
different denominations. The moral theologians are expected to interpret
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
The pope spoke on May 13 to participants of an international conference on moral theology sponsored by the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome and the Pontifical John Paul II Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences.
They discussed Pope Francis' exhorationa Amoris Laetitia which was made possible with Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise. The Council interpreted irrationally was used to justify innovation in moral theology.The result is that the Eucharist is given at Holy Mass to the divorced and remarried.
Similarly in Germany the Eucharist is also given to Protestants and Cardinal Marx justifies this action with Vatican Council II.
But if Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally by the German Bishops Conference then the Council would not contain practical exceptions for the past exclusivist ecclesiolgy. It would mean that Protestants are still outside the Church and on the way to Hell without Catholic faith. It also means that based upon the old ecclesiocentrism, there could not be claims for a new moral theology or a development of doctrine.So a heretic is a heretic and mortal sin is mortal sin according to the old moral theology. It is only with the Fundamental Optionists that moral theology was changed with casuitry based upon Vatican Council II interpreted unethically.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
