Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Will Pope Francis tomorrow(Thursday) say that there is known salvation outside the Church? : Cushingite document expected ?

Image result for Photos Nouvelle Theologie RevueImage result for Photo of Ladaria and Muller
Accredited journalists are informed that on Thursday 1 March 2018, at 11.00 am, in the Press Office of the Holy See, in Via della Conciliazione 54, the Press Conference will be held presenting the [encyclical] letter Placuit Deo to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on some aspects of salvation Christian. 

Speakers:

– HE Msgr. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, SI, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith;

– HE Mons. Giacomo Morandi, Secretary of the same Congregation.

https://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2018/02/27/oooo-im-so-excited/



















FEBRUARY 27, 2018

The Holy See

Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-ratzinger-and-cardinal-luiz.html











































































____________________________________



Meditation (part 1 of 2) ~ Fr Ripperger

At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.

The doctrines and theology being taught in Detroit, Michigan are vague and so they have not been opposed.The errors are being taught to seminarians and school children in religion class and is part of the New Theology of even Church Militant TV(CMTV).
Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and the Rector at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit  do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of irrational Cushingism.
They all interpret Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method.The students are not told that the passages that they identify as being against EENS are neutral passages.They are references to hypotheical cases.So they do not contradict the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II. The Feeneyite passages are orthodox and the Cushingite passages are hypothetical. The Feeneyite passages avoid the false premise(invisible people are just invisible and not visible) and the Cushingite passages depend on the premise.
Similar to Vatican Council II, EENS can also be interpreted with Feeneyism( avoid the premise) and Cushingism( the irrational premise is used) and this is not told to students and seminarians in Detroit.
Instead the seminarians are wrongly taught to interpret EENS with Cushingism i.e hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are non hypothetical.They are supposed to be personally known people saved outside the Church. This is the common inference when BOD, BOB and I.I are considered exceptions to the traditional, strict interpretation of EENS.
So magisterial documents are interpreted by all with a new and irrational theology to produce new doctrines and change the interpretation of the dogma EENS.
The reasoning used by the professors and priests violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and these new irrational theories cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
They are taught by professors Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin and  are an obvious rupture with the popes and Church Councils of the past.There is a rupture here with the Catechisms of Pope Pius X and Trent.When the past Catechisms for example, mention invincible ignorance it is assumed that this is a reference to a known person saved outside the Church. This is Cushingite theology. Similarly when Mystici Corporis etc mention BOD, BOB and I.I it is assumed that it is a reference to known salvation outside the Church and so contradicts Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston. Again this is irrational.
Dr. Fastiggi has given a talk in which he mentions Fr. Leonard Feeney critically.So with his new interpretation of EENS ( with exceptions), he uses the same reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II(with exceptions) to become a rupture with the popes of the past on EENS(with no exceptions).This is schism.
Prof. Fastiggi was perhaps not aware of this when it was pointed out to him by Bishop Donald Sanborn in the debate on Ecclesiology.
Or may be he knew but could not do anything about it since this was the common interpretation of Vatican Council II and he did not know about the Feeneyite choice.Neither did Bishop Sanborn seem to know.
This is all schism with the past popes  and in the debate Dr. Fastiggi was telling the sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn that schism was a sin and a terrible thing.
Sanborn responded that he had no other choice since Vatican Council II was a rupture with the past.He meant Vatican Council II (Cushingite).
At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.
-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 28, 2018
At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.

FEBRUARY 27, 2018
Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to

FEBRUARY 27, 2018
So the charge of schism can now be made against the liberal Catholic faculty in Detroit .It can be made by Bishop Donald Sanborn against Dr.Robert Fastiggi.The tables have turned.

FEBRUARY 26, 2018
Ralph Martin, Fr.Gerald Collins, Eduardo Echeverria,Gavin D'Costa and others make an objective mistake in the Homilectic and Pastoral Review