Saturday, March 11, 2017

Our interest is to share the Catholic truth with Jewish people and all others so that they might enter the Catholic Church, live devout sacramental lives, and go to Heaven. Conversion to Jesus Christ and His true Church is our message to Jew and Gentile alike


reconquest.net

Our interest is to share the Catholic truth with Jewish people and all others so that they might enter the Catholic Church, live devout sacramental lives, and go to Heaven. Conversion to Jesus Christ and His true Church is our message to Jew and Gentile alike.-Br. Andre Marie MICM
http://catholicism.org/splc-hate-group-calumny-continues.html

English Christian theologians nonplussed : first exposure to factual errors in Vatican Council II

Christian professors of theology make no comment or have nothing to say on a faith-issue, when I send them these blog posts.It is their first exposure to factual errors in Vatican Council II .There are no theological papers or precedents from which they can draw support.
UnknownThe basic error is there in philosophy.It  has spilled over into theology.Now there is a new Catholic theology on salvation based on a philosophical error, an irrational premise.
CARDINALS AT VATICAN COUNCIL II LET THE ERROR PASS
The cardinals and bishops at Vatican Council II (1960-1965) let the error pass.There was confusion in the Church from 1949. The Boston newspapers stated that the Church had changed its position on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They said Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy for rejecting the baptism of desire etc as exceptions to the dogma EENS.There was no correction from the Archbishop of Boston .Nor did the cardinals in Rome during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII affirm the faith.Fr.Leonard Feeney held the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known in the 16th century.He converted many, including young men from the wealthy Protestant and Jewish families in Boston.
VATICAN COUNCIL II ACCEPTS NARRATIVE OF BOSTON NEWSPAPERS 
The Father Feeney Update
The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was not lifted in 1965 and Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits at Boston, who had placed restrictions on members of the St. Benedict Center, were active at Vatican Council II.They gave us Nostra Aetate and in general assumed hypothetical cases were explicit and objective exceptions to EENS.There also were allegedly known people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This was the narrative of the Letter of the Holy Office and the Boston newspapers, accepted during Vatican Council II.
CUSHING REPEATED THE ERROR OF THE 1949 LETTER IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
Cardinal Cushing got away with the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him. He made the Letter public three years after it was privately sent to him.Pope Pius XII said nothing in the defense of Fr.Leonard Feeney. It is not known if he knew about the objective error in the Letter since even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not criticize the Letter.
TRADITIONALISTS ARE STILL NOT AWARE OF THE PRECISE PHILOSOPHICAL MISTAKE
Now after some 70- plus years the traditionalists are still not aware of it and they do not oppose this precise philosophical mistake in Vatican Council II.Some of them do know about it  but to avoid suspension, to protect their reputation or careers, they do not come out in the open.This includes SSPX  and diocesan priests.
I avoid the irrational premise when I interpret Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council II without the invisible-visible mix up is rational and traditional.I will not use the new theology based on a strange premise as approved by the Jewish Left rabbis associated with Israel.
The Christian theologians in the USA and Europe who are now aware that there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II, may not want to choose the rational option.Since then they would have to interpret Vatican Council II  in harmony with EENS according to the 16th century missionaries.Their employers will not approve it.

POPE BENEDICT CHOSE CUSHINGISM FROM THE FEENEYITE-CUSHING MODEL
Last March 2016 in an interview published in the daily Avvenire,  Pope Benedict XVI assured the Jewish Left  and whoever mattered, that extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.1 There was a development of doctrine, he said, with Vatican Council II.He meant Vatican Council II (Cushingite), which assumes invisible cases are visible and hypothetical cases are defacto known in 2017 are examples of salvation outside the Church. So there was for him, known salvation outside the Church.Anyway, this was also the mistake in Vatican Council II and he 'only' repeated the same error in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus.He chose Cushingism, from the Feeneyite-Cushingite theological model.
FOR THE TWO POPES THERE IS SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH: THE SACRAMENTS ARE NOT ALWAYS NEEDED
Known people, for the two popes, are allegedly saved  without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. They are saved without the Catholic Sacraments and the Church's faith and moral teachings and interpretation of the Catholic Bible.
LIBERAL THEOLOGIANS EVEN RE-INTERPRET THE SCHOLASTICS WITH CUSHINGISM
So like theologians Ratzinger, Rahner, Kung and Kasper theologians at large have interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with the  Syllabus of Errors.It was a break with EENS as it was known to Fr. Francis Xavier, St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis of Assisi, St Teresa of Avila...The liberal theologians have created a new EENS and Vatican Council II, interpreted with the Cushingite model.They even re-interpret St. Robert Bellarmine, St.Thomas Aquinas and St.Alphonsus Ligouiri with Cushingism.
Professor Paul JoycePhotograph of Dr Susannah Ticciati
ENGLISH BISHOPS GIVE THE MANDATUM ONLY TO TEACH THE NEW THEOLOGY WITH THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE
Tom O'Loughlin, professor of theology, at the University of Nottingham, England and Gavin D'Costa, professor of theology at the University of Bristol, England, have been informed. I have e-mailed some of these reports to them.
Even after being informed, it seems, they still will maintain the lie.They will continue to use irrational philosophy.They will support the false premise and false conclusion.They are  supported by the pro-Left English Catholic hierarchy which issues the mandatum for a Catholic to teach the new theology, Cushingism.The use of the false premise is mandatory.-Lionel Andrades

1.
Pope Benedict uses irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus : he was unaware of the choice
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/pope-benedict-uses-irrational.html


MARCH 10, 2017

University of Nottingham professor maintains invisible cases are visible : irrational inference not professional or ethical

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/university-of-nottingham-professor.html
 http://catholicism.org/author/fatherleonardfeeneymicm