His Mystici Corporis was Cushingite with the Irrational Premise and not Feeneyite like the Council of Florence 1441.
He did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney in public and did not lift the Jesuit priest’s excommunication.
It was Pope Paul VI who
lifted Fr. Leonard Feeney’s excommunication without the priest having to
recant. He simply had to recite the Creed and he chose the Athanasius Creed which
says outside the Church there is no salvation, all must be Catholic.
But Pope
Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism, the New Theology of
Pope Pius XII. So the Council was a break with Feeneyite EENS.
So the
New Theology was the norm. Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for not
accepting invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions
for extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was
excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II, interpreted with the New
Theology, as being a break with the past ecclesiocentrism, the Syllabus of
Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
Now Pope
Francis has given us Traditionis Custode with Vatican Council II interpreted
with the Irrational Premise. This is unethical.
He is changing
faith and morals in the name of Vatican Council II and interprets the Council
irrationally and not rationally like me.
Bishop Ray Browne in Kerry, Ireland cancelled Fr. Sean Sheehy recently since there is no more the old moral theology for him with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
If Bishop Ray Browne would interpret Vatican Council II rationally, he would be a traditionalist, in faith and morals.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
