Monday, January 30, 2017

Lay Catholics are not aware of the great deception and compromise being undertaken by the SSPX and the Vatican

I am re-posting here the blogpost  titled The Great Deception in the Catholic Church


In the name of 'theology', which is presented as a difficult subject and is  there for only those who can learn Latin, Greek and Hebrew, changes have been made in Catholic doctrine, which is approved by the two popes and the Jewish Left rabbis.
Eduardo López-Tello García
Prof. S.Visintin osb, the former Italian Dean of Theology at the University of St.Anselm,  Rome has said that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and so it cannot be an exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) - yet the new Dean of Theology at St.Anselm is expected to say just this! -it is an exception, to the dogma EENS as it was known to St. Benedict and St. Scholastica.This is being taught in 'theology' in all the pontifical universities.
Gregory Polan
A lay man with no degree in the new theology may ask,"But where are these cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water?"
The professors at the St. Anselm University would answer 'but this is what the Church teaches and this is what we must obey.'
The professors at the Regina Apostolorum, Rome would say that 'we must keep in step with the Church'.
"But these persons are invisible and they do not exist in 2016 so why must we have to accept this when the saints like Maximillian Kolbe and St.Benedict did not do so,neither did the Jesuits like Robert Bellarmine and Francis Xavier", the lay Catholic would ask.
Elias Lorenzo
"This is a mystery in the Church that we have to accept",  the priest- professor would say, " a new mystery in the Church".
So in the name of THEOLOGY they are teaching heresy and lay Catholics are following it and consider it Catholic doctrine.It really is a new politically correct teaching to get rid of the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus. They do this with a false premise.The false premise is that of the baptism of desire being visible and known in the present times, even though these cases are invisible and do not exist in our reality.This is falsehood, a lie, a deception yet is it officially being taught as Catholic theology. No pope or saint of the past mentioned a visible for us baptism of desire etc. This is all inferred by liberal theologians and is approved by the popes and the political Left.-Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 30, 2017


They are willing to settle for silence on Vatican Council II from Bishop Fellay since he is ignorant about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/they-are-willing-to-settle-for-silence.html



They are willing to settle for silence on Vatican Council II from Bishop Fellay since he is ignorant about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

It could also mean that the Vatican Curia (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) knows that Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) can be interpreted without the irratational premise and the Council would really be traditional and no more politically correct.So they are willing to settle for silence on Vatican Council II from Bishop Fellay since he is ignorant about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
Image result for Photo congregation for the doctrine of the faith building Vatican
So the CDF is taking advantage of the SSPX.The SSPX bishops do not know of the subtle new theology which has changed traditional doctrine.They are not aware of the precise philosophical error which is responsible for the new theology used by the SSPX and the Vatican.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/bishop-fellay-will-not-accept-vatican.html




DECEMBER 30, 2016

Benedictine revolution in the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/benedictine-revolution-in-catholic.html


Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson, Fr.S.Visintin osb, John Martignoni and Catholic priests in Rome say that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They are familiar with the basic laws of nature .Humans can only see visible things http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/archbishop-thomas-e-gullickson.html


December 29, 2016

The great deception in the Catholic Church

Bishop Fellay will not accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) nor ask the two popes to do the same : wants to stay with Vatican Council II (Cushingism)

Bishop Fellay will not accept Vatican Council II Feeneyite nor ask the two popes to affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyism.He wants to stay as they are with Vatican Council II Cushingism
... “there is one condition sine qua non, namely, that we can stay as we are.” [my emphasis] Without this assurance, says Fellay, “we will not do anything.” For, the SSPX still has some “grave criticisms” concerning what has happened “in the Church since Vatican II”; as representative topics, for example, the Swiss bishop mentions the practical “integration of Communism”; “Religious Liberty”; the “relationship between Church and State”; and the question of toleration of other religions, one of which is today is to be seen, more and more, in the context and presence of “terror.” It now seems to Fellay that “we go in the right direction” and that, by way of alleviation of the pressure, “Rome has lifted a foot for two years now.” This apparently new attitude of Rome implies that some disputed questions concerning the Second Vatican Council are not strictly related to the binding “criteria of Catholicity.” Fellay explains: “That means that one has the right not to be in agreement [with some aspects of the Second Vatican Council] but still be considered to be Catholic.”-Bishop Fellay on SSPX Regularization: “There is One Condition…”-Maike Hickson
Lionel:
Bishop Fellay is saying that he wants the SSPX to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and that he will not accept Vatican Council II Cushingism, as is being sought by Pope Francis. Also he and the SSPX will not accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) nor ask the two popes to affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
So all the SSPX bishops,priests and lay supporters are to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism and will not contradict Archbishop Lefebvre and interpret Vatican Council II with rational and traditional Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
He will not ask Rome to come back to the Catholic Faith as Archbishop Lefebvre sought.Since if the two popes acceped Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) then the Vatican would have come back to the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

However it would also mean Archbishop Lefebvre, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Roberto De Mattei and other traditionalists had made an error and were unaware of it.
So the priority his 'staying as we are' which is a rejection of tradtional extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) which is replaced by them, with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Cushingite).This is the dogma mentioned in March 2016 by Pope Benedict in the Avvenire interview. He said that the dogma was no more like it was in the 16th century.S
The priority for the SSPX is to reject Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which supports the old ecclesiocentrism:The Council would them be in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite). Since with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there is no change in the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church, there is no change in ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, Social Reign of Christ the King, non separation of Church and State etc.
Image result for Photo Nicene Creed
So staying as we  are means the Nicene Creed will no more refer to one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, for Bishop Fellay, but it would refer to three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins,water, blood, desire.All are visible and known baptisms in 2017 like the baptism of water, which can be seen or repeated.
It means rejecting the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) by interpreting CCC 1257 and 846 with Cushingism and as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite).It also means not affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church(Feeneyite) in which 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' refers to hypothetical cases and so are not exceptions to the traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).
Image result for Photo Catechism of the Catholic Church
Also affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church(Feeneyite) means all who are saved are saved through Jesus Christ (CCC 846 Outside the Church no salvation) takes into account, being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire without the baptism of water, as being hypothetical and invisible cases and so not being objective are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.
This apparently new attitude of Rome implies that some disputed questions concerning the Second Vatican Council are not strictly related to the binding “criteria of Catholicity.” Fellay explains: “That means that one has the right not to be in agreement [with some aspects of the Second Vatican Council] but still be considered to be Catholic.”-Maike Hickson
It could also mean that the Vatican Curia (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) knows that Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) can be interpreted without the irrtational premise and the Council would really be traditional and no more politically correct.So they are willing to settle for silence on Vatican Council II from Bishop Fellay since he is ignorant about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
Image result for Photo congregation for the doctrine of the faith building Vatican
So the CDF is taking advantage of the SSPX.The SSPX bishops do not know of the subtle new theology which has changed traditional doctrine.They are not aware of the precise philosophical error which is responsible for the new theology used by the SSPX and the Vatican.
The new theology is not permanent.The Church can return back to the old doctrine on ecumenism etc if the theology is identified and avoided but the SSPX has not done this.Even Bishop Richard Williamson and Bishop Athanasius Schneider are not aware of it.
Inspite of so many reports on this blog which have been available on line there is the old ignorance among the traditionalists and sedevacantists.
Image result for photo of Archbishop Thomas E.gullickson
They have had no comment on the statement by Bishop Thomas E.Gullickson.He has said that the baptism of desire etc are not explicit and so are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So for him Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) would not be a rupture with Tradition and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).He called on the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II but obviously it was not Vatican Council II(Cushingism) but Vatican Council II without the irrational premise of visible for us baptism of desire.
Image result for Photo University of St.Anselm Rome
Similarly the SSPX has ignored the present Vice Rector of the University of St.Anselm Rome, Fr.Stefano Visintin osb.When he was the the Dean of Theology at the Benedictine University in Rome, he  said that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
For Bishop Fellay they are exceptions.Also for the two popes they are exceptions. So with this irrationality they intepret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. The SSPX rejects this Vatican Council II (Cushingism) and the two popes accept it, this is where they both want to stay where they are .-Lionel Andrades

Two popes irrational and in heresy : Archbishop Gullickson, Fr.Visintin osb correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/two-popes-irrational-and-in-heresy.html

The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ - Part 10

The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ - Part 10

The Gerasene Demoniac (1/30/17)

https://youtu.be/lnFW20BPlI0

The Gerasene Demoniac (1/30/17)
https://www.gloria.tv/
Daily Reflection for 1/30/17 www.apostleshipofprayer.org

Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Mark 5:1-20.
Jesus and his disciples came to the other side of the sea, to the territory of the Gerasenes.
When he got out of the boat, at once a man from the tombs who had an unclean spirit met him.
The man had been dwelling among the tombs, and no one could restrain him any longer, even with a chain.
In fact, he had frequently been bound with shackles and chains, but the chains had been pulled apart by him and the shackles smashed, and no one was strong enough to subdue him.
Night and day among the tombs and on the hillsides he was always crying out and bruising himself with stones.
Catching sight of Jesus from a distance, he ran up and prostrated himself before him,
crying out in a loud voice, "What have you to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I adjure you by God, do not torment me!"
(He had been saying to him, "Unclean spirit, come out of the man!")
He asked him, "What is your name?" He replied, "Legion is my name. There are many of us."
And he pleaded earnestly with him not to drive them away from that territory.
Now a large herd of swine was feeding there on the hillside.
And they pleaded with him, "Send us into the swine. Let us enter them."
And he let them, and the unclean spirits came out and entered the swine. The herd of about two thousand rushed down a steep bank into the sea, where they were drowned.
The swineherds ran away and reported the incident in the town and throughout the countryside. And people came out to see what had happened.
As they approached Jesus, they caught sight of the man who had been possessed by Legion, sitting there clothed and in his right mind. And they were seized with fear.
Those who witnessed the incident explained to them what had happened to the possessed man and to the swine.
Then they began to beg him to leave their district.
As he was getting into the boat, the man who had been possessed pleaded to remain with him.
But he would not permit him but told him instead, "Go home to your family and announce to them all that the Lord in his pity has done for you."
Then the man went off and began to proclaim in the Decapolis what Jesus had done for him; and all were amazed.
__________________________




__________________________