In ASK FATHER: Why MUST one be in communion with Rome?, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf once again does not affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), He does not affirm EENS according to the 16th century missionaries when they offered the Traditional Latin Mass.
I had mentioned in a blog post that Fr.Zuhlsdorf to possibly protect his personal interests is denying the Catholic Faith. In this way he maintains his incardination as a priest .
He assumes hypothetical cases are not hypothetical and he expects others to also make this error in principle.I do not and he does not correct me as a priest.
He suggests theoretical cases of the baptism of desire, allegedly without the baptism of water and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2016 are not theoretical.I do not.His teaching is irrational.
Since they are visible for him the baptism of desire is an exception to traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS Feeneyite).Not for me.
He actually interprets the Nicene Creed with this error( knowingly or unknowingly).This is a first class heresy.How can such aa priest be incardinated in Italy ?
I have e-mailed these blog posts to him and he has no denial.
How can he say that he affirms EENS( Feeneyite).Since in Norcia and the rest of Italy there are no explicit for us baptism of desire and blood or being saved in invincible ignorance cases in 2016.There are none with or without the baptism of water whom he could meet on the streets.
He could be using this falsehood to remain politically correct but then so could Nancy Pelosi,John Allen at the National Catholic( Fishwrap) Register and other Catholics whom he criticizes with reference to Canon Law.
I affirm the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feneeyite), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) and Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Feeneyite)-all without the false premise and conclusion.Fr. Z will not do the same.
Neither will do the bishops in Italy do this, including the one in Norcia.Even the Benedictines at Norcia maintain the lie.Fr. Cassian Folsom osb, the Rector of the Benedictine monastery in Norcia will also not affirm the Faith without the lie.
However there is an exception.The Benedictine Dean of Theology at the St.Anselm University in Rome contradicts Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Fr. Cassian Folsom osb.
Fr.Visintin does not lie.
He says there are no known exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite) in the present times.This makes sense. He is an honest priest.
John Martignoni the Americal apologist agrees with him.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and many Catholic priests agree with Fr. Visintin 2
So Canon Law could apply to him in Norcia, Italy where he is reportedly incardinated.
Fr.Zuhlsdorf's new ecclesiology is based on a lie.
His New Theology is based on a lie.
His interpretation of Vatican Council II is based on a falsehood.
He interprets the Nicene Creed with an irrationality and the conclusion is false and irrational and this is not known to Catholics.Thefalsehood is not known.
So his doctrinal and theological position on Islam would be based on a politically correct lie.3
He even supports inter faith marriages and does not consider them adulterous, since there is known salvation for him outside the Church. He is a liberal on this point.
So he has no response when I say that I affirm EENS without Cushingism.
He believes that EENS( Cushingism) is the normal way to affirm EENS. Since this was part of his liberal Catholic religious formation as a priest.So for him Fr. Leonard Feeney held 'the hard line' position on EENS.
On the other hand if he says EENS( Cushingism) is irrational and EENS ( Feeneyite) is traditional his opponents will come sweeping down on him.So presently only with all this irrational and non traditional liberal theology and doctrine on salvation, he responds to the Muslim issue.4
ASK FATHER: Why MUST one be in communion with Rome?http://wdtprs.com/blog/2016/09/ask-father-why-must-one-be-in-communion-with-rome/