No comment from SSPX in Rome. They will continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and not talk to the faithful about it

 

Today morning Fr.Federico Montani offered the 9 a.m Latin Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome. There is no comment from him and the SSPX in Albano, on what I write here about the SSPX and their interpretation of Vatican Council II. They are going to interpret Vatican Council II ir-rationally and not rationally. They are not going to talk to the people about it. They will continue writing articles and producing magazines which will interpret the Council irrationally and then they will blame the Council and not their False Premise.

Also the Angelus Press of the SSPX will produce more books with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. They may not be allowed to publish books on Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. For then they will be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is Anti Semitic for the Left.

In this way the priests are politically correct with the Left. Their  approach to Vatican Council II is the same as the liberals. They know it is dishonest but they will continue with it. There is no comment from Fr. Davide Pagliarani or Bishop Bernard Fellay.Like the priests who offer the Novus Ordo Mass, the SSPX priority in Italy is security and not doctrine.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 5, 2023

The SSPX priests at Albano are to continue to give sermons at their chapel in Rome based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally? They know that there is an objective error in their interpretation of Vatican Council II. They know they have a rational and traditional option but they are not talking about it.

 

The SSPX priests at Albano are to continue to give sermons at their chapel in Rome based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally? They know that there is an objective error in their interpretation of Vatican Council II. They know they have a rational and traditional option but they are not talking about it. They will continue to interpret the Council only irrationally and will base their sermons upon this dishonesty and then remain politically correct with the Left and not be accused of being Anti Semitic. So they do not lose their status as a charitable organization whose donations continue to be tax exempt.

Next Sunday Fr. Federico Montani will give a sermon at the Latin Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome and will intentionally interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and so avoid being expelled by the SSPX. In this way the SSPX will also not be excommunicated by Pope Francis.- Lionel Andrades

MAY 2, 2023

Fr.Federico Montani will be offering the Latin Mass at the SSPX District Center in Albano, during this week, and no one is asking him for an account of his Catholic Faith in public.The SSPX District Albano is also not quick to issue a statement.Fr. Montani is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally while he has a rational option.

 

Fr.Federico Montani will be offering the Latin Mass at the SSPX District Center in Albano, during this week, and no one is asking him for an account of his Catholic Faith in public.The SSPX District Albano is also not quick to issue a statement.Fr. Montani is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally while he has a rational option. This is official schism. Since he changes the traditional understanding of the Nicene Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed. There are liberal interpretations of the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X on the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. The Syllabus of Errors is made obsolete.

Fr. Federico Montani is a good preacher and I like his sermons. He is comfortable with Tradition. He has a fluent and particular style which is different from the other SSPX priests in Italy.

However he is obediently following the heresy and schism of the SSPX General Council on Vatican Council II, irrational.There can now be two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational. It all depends upon how LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are interpreted. They, LG 8 etc,  can be interpreted with or without a false premise and the conclusion is different. The SSPX conclusion is un-ethical.  The General Curia in Econe is now even afraid to talk about it in public for political reasons.

Even lay supporters of the SSPX, like Roberto dei Mattei, a rich man, are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and keeping silent on this issue.  -Lionel Andrades

MAY 1, 2023

How can the SSPX faithful at the St. Catherine of Siena chapel in Rome receive a plenary indulgence under the usual conditions?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/how-can-sspx-faithful-at-st-catherine.html

Public mortal sins which Pope Francis and the CDF must correct

 PUBLIC MORTAL SINS WHICH POPE FRANICS AND THE CDF MUST CORRECT

Pope Francis has committed the following mortal sins.These are some which come to mind off hand.They are as follows.

1). He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. So his conclusion is heretical and schismatic.It changes the interpretation of de fide teachings, Creeds and Catechisms.

2). Since he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, he changes the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. Again this is heretical.It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.They did not interpret the Creeds with the irrational premise.They did not interpret the baptism of desire with the irrational premise.

3). Since he interprets Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire etc irrationally, he rejects the Athanasius Creed.This Creeds says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. The pope is saying there are known exceptions in the present times. He implies that there are visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II (Ad Teuendem Fidem).To contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Athanasius Creed there would have to be physically visible exceptoins. It is only then that EENS etc become obsolete.Invisible cases cannot be exceptions for EENS in the present times ( 1949-2023).

4) Since he has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally he has produced a new ecclesiology and so justifies changes in traditional morals too, as in the case of Amoris Laetitia etc.He has not excommunicated the German bishops who also justify their moral liberalism. They base it upon  Vatican Council II irrational. - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/there-is-also-fourth-possibility.html

The CDF was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston and Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. They have a rational and traditional option

 1. But the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. The CDF chose the irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is was unethical and not Catholic. It was political.

2.The CDF was also Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). It interpreted invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council.

This Council says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the CDF, in the 1949 Letter says not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation, as if there are personally known exceptions for them in the present times.

3.Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is an objective mistake in public and cannot be Magisterial. This is political and not Catholic.

 The CDF was also not Magisterial on this issue during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. As Prefect of the CDF, Pope Benedict rejected the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and 16^th century EENS of the missionaries. They were rejected in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades

Thousands march in Italy’s national ‘Demonstration for Life’

 

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/254373/photos-thousands-march-in-italy-s-national-demonstration-for-life

Medjugorje | The Tyrer Family from Ireland : 22nd visit to Medugorje ."This is a piece of Heaven".

Sixth visit to Medjugorje | Caelum from Ireland keeps returning to Medugorje. The peace draws hims. Gives up addiction.

CDF is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. This is not the Magisterium. The Magisterium would interpret Vatican Council II rationally, ethically, traditionally and so non schismatically

 

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican is not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since it interprets the Council irrationally and not rationally. When it interprets the Council rationally, it will be  Magisterial. There will be a continuity with Tradition. Now with Cushingism; with the use use of the false premise the CDF produces a false break with Tradition. This is un-ethical. It is dishonest and not Catholic. The CDF interpretation of Vatican Council II is political and approved by the ADL and the rest of the Jewish Left.

So Michael Voris cannot say that they are Magisterial when they follow the CDF irrational interpretation of Magisterial Documents. Church Militant TV cannot say that they follow the Magisterium. The Holy Spirit will guide the CDF to only interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms rationally and so honestly. The Holy Spirit will not create a break with Tradition by choosing a dishonest premise. The Creeds cannot be changed. They are de fide teachings. Every Catholic is obligated to accept them with their original understanding. The Creeds must be interpreted with Feeneyism only. The CDF presently interprets the Creeds with irrational and heretical Cushingism. So there is official schism which is supported by Pope Francis. There is a break with the ecclesiology of St. Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Teresa of Avila, St.John Bosco…The CDF has lost the Four Marks of the Church. Catholics are obliged to reject the CDF interpretation of Vatican Council II in good conscience.-Lionel Andrades

Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) :The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is Cushingite and political on this issue and so not Magisterial

 

Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which he does not support for political reasons. He does not want to be labeled a Feeneyite.It would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.

So he leaves Catholics in the dark, uninformed. He looks after his liberal reputation and the financial position of Church Militant TV. In the Vortex, 'lies and truths' are no more captured on this issue, since it could be expensive. Neither can he criticize the US bishops or the SSPX for not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally instead of irrationally, since then he would have to do the same.

CDF WAS NOT MAGISTERIAL IN THE 1949 LETTER

Michael Voris says that he follows the Magisterium of the Church and so also the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. 

1. But the CDF was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. The CDF chose the irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is was unethical and not Catholic. It was political.

2.The CDF was also Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). It interpreted invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council.

This Council says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the CDF, in the 1949 Letter says not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation, as if there are personally known exceptions for them in the present times.

Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is an objective mistake in public and cannot be Magisterial. This is political and not Catholic.

 The CDF was also not Magisterial on this issue during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. As Prefect of the CDF, Pope Benedict rejected the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and 16^th century EENS of the missionaries. They were rejected in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

The rational interpretation of Vatican Council II would not be appreciated or tolerated by the Mosaad, the Pasdaran and the equivalent organization in Saudi Arabia.

So Michael Voris and the CDF choose to interpret Vatican Council II deceptively and politically and they wrongly call it the magisterium.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 20, 2023

 

Sedevacantism is not the solution

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/sedevacantism-is-not-solution_20.html

MAY 19, 2023

There is also the fourth possibility, the orthodox one. Pope Francis is the pope but because of mortal sins, un-confessed and because of scandals not rectified, he is not in communion with Jesus and the Church. He lacks Sanctifying Grace and is outside the Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/there-is-also-fourth-possibility.html

Taylor, for President!

 

Dr Taylor Marshall

@TaylorRMarshall

As I run for President of the United States, I am placing on my platform the definition of “matrimony” as one man and one woman united by vows “until death do us part.” I will push for this definition to be recognized by the United States and by the United Nations.

Traduci il Tweet

3:04 PM · 15 mag 2023

·

66.458

visualizzazioni

Taylor, for President!

The Catholic Church should be actively participating in national politics since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally and so the Church returns to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, upon which is proclaimed the non separation of Church and State and the Social Reign of Christ as King in all political legislation.

 Let’s see how the political system in the USA responds to Dr.Taylor Marshall. The issue is not whether he wins or loses, but how much he can project his good values, how much he can catechize Catholics. He could do what the bishops are unable to do because of political restrictions.

Among other things he has announced that he will work for an end to pornography -abortion too.

Pope Francis supports liberalism and the Left. He uses his political power to interpret Vatican Council II as it is approved by the ADL. Taylor could work for financing bishops who interpret the Council rationally and teach traditional Catechism.The Vatican embassies are presently supporting a non Catholic religion based upon the false and unethical interpretation of the Council.

His message to Catholics, at least, will be that the Church and State are not separate. The separation of the Church and State is a secular concept supported by Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally and so as a break with Tradition.

Taylor Marshall could bring out the good things in the American  people  just as Obama and Biden drew out the bad.

Initially it was thought that Trump was the underdog and he had no chance of winning. The media was against him. But the American people were listening to him.They will also listen to Taylor.

The real issue in American politics is not economics but morals: Heaven or Hell, God or Satan, angels or demans. There is a war on the spiritual level.

The US Congress passed a motion many years back supporting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. This was not Catholic. Taylor could be a rational and traditional voice in US politics.

He could work to set up a Catholic political party, with common Catholic values all over the world. This is easier now, since the teachings of the Chutch on doctrine are consistent. The liberalism in the Church has become obsolete with the discovery of Vatican Council II and othe Magisterial Documents, interpreted with a rational premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades

There is no honest theology which could support the priests new understanding of being Church. He can no more seek refuge in Vatican Council II

 

When the priest speaks about a New Theology, or new concept of being Church or a new concept of being Christian or a New Ecumenism, where is the theology to support him ? Vatican Council II ?

Yesterday in three languages, Italian, French and English, the priest at Mass in Italian at the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, Rome, mentioned the new ecclesiology, the new understanding of being Church. He said Jesus, after the Ascension, was present not only in the church/ Catholic Church, but even outside the Church.

Yes God can be present outside the church, in ways known only to God, but salvation is there in only the Catholic Church.

If the priest   was saying that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church, where is the theology to support this new opinion ? Vatican Council II ?

The Council can only be interpreted rationally and then it supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. The liberalism can only come with the false premise, the irrational version of Vatican Council II.

So there is no honest theology which could  support the priests new understanding of being Church. He can no more seek refuge in Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades

Tumore guarito miracolosamente a Medugorje/ Tumor healed miraculously at Medugorje / Une tumeur guérie miraculeusement à Medugorje /Der Tumor heilte in Medjugorje auf wundersame Weise

The Cushingite version of the Nicene Creed is not our Catholic Faith!!

 

Yesterday evening at Mass in Italian for the feast of the Annunciation at the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, near Piazza Spagna, Rome, the priest had the faithful affirm the Creed in a question and answer form. It is common in this church.

Then the priest concluded by saying that this is our faith. This is our Catholic Faith.

But there are two interpretations of the Creed- Feeneyite and Cushingite. The Nicene and Apostles Creed can be interpreted with an irrational or rational premise and the conclusion is non traditional or traditional. With the irrational premise the conclusion is non traditional with the rational premise it is traditional.

So there are the four marks of the Church or there is a rupture.

It is the same with Vatican Council II. There can be two interpretations. It depends upon the premise and inference chosen.

So without clarifying the difference between a Feneeyite and Cushingite version of the Nicene Creed, for example, it is meaningless to say that this is our faith. Since the Cushingite version of the Nicene Creed is not the faith!!

Presently we do not have unity on the Creeds at church. Pope Francis interprets the Creeds irrationally to support his liberalism. Pope Benedict did the same.

Even the sedevacantists and the SSPX choose Cushingism to interpret the Creeds etc.-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 8, 2022

The bishop of Listowel,Ireland, Ray Browne is offering the lex orandi with irrational and heretical Cushingism at the Novus Ordo Mass.The popes, cardinals and archbishops are doing the same and so he is not being cancelled.There cannot be a lex orandi with Cushingism.Since this would be interpreting the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS, the baptism of desire and Vatican Council irrationally to create mortal sins of faith

From Twitter.

The bishop of Listowel,Ireland, Ray Browne is offering the lex orandi with irrational and heretical Cushingism at the Novus Ordo Mass.The popes, cardinals and archbishops are doing the same and so he is not being cancelled.There cannot be a lex orandi with Cushingism.Since this would be interpreting the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS, the baptism of desire and Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism to create mortal sins of faith.

DIVISION IN THE CHURCH WITH REFERENCE TO LEX ORANDI COMES WITH CUSHINGISM

The division in the Church with reference to the Society of St.Pius X and the Franciscans of the Immaculate - or the lex orandi of Catholics in general- comes with Cushingism.We have identified the precise cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.We can avoid it always by replacing Cushingism with Feeneyism, as a philosophy and theology.

The interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS etc.,with Feeneyism, changes during the lex orandi.

The issue now before us to see which of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, did Traditionis Custode choose.

LEX ORANDI HAS TO BE WITH FEENEYISM

We now know that the lex orandi has to be with Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.Since Feeneyism is rational, traditional and orthodox.Cushingism is irrational. It has its foundation on the Irrational Premise.So the people cannot use it as the lex orandi.The theology of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc, must not be irrational.

The Rational Premise says invisible people are invisible.So the Rational Inference says Lumen Gentium 16 etc.,does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.So the Traditional Conclusion is that Vatican Council II does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.Feeneyism is the Rational Premise, Inference and Traditional Conclusion.

TRADITIONAL CUSTODE HAS TO BE INTERPRETED WITH FEENEYISM ONLY

Since Vatican Council II is Feeneyite, Traditional Custode has to be interpreted with Feeneyism.It must say that the lex orandi can only be Feeneyite.So with Feeneyism the lex orandi is traditional and orthodox at every Mass,
  in all liturgies and rites.

Feeneyism says what is invisible is invisible. So the baptism of desire (LG 14) refer to an invisible case in 2022.Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms can only,morally, be interpreted with Feeneyism- so also Traditionis Custode.

The lex orandi at Mass must only be Feeneyite.

THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE ROMAN MISSAL IS THE ONLY LEX ORANDI POSSIBLE

The ecclesiology of the Roman Missal ( 1870) is the only lex orandi possible since its theology and philosophy is Feeneyite.Vatican Council II can only ethically be interpreted with Feeneyism.Cushingism is modernism.

There cannot be a lex orandi with Cushingism since Cushingism is heretical and dishonest.Ethically we can only choose Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II.So the lex orandi can only be the old Roman Missal with the old theology.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with Cushingism then there is a break with the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal.So only the Novus Ordo Mass is left with the New Theology created with Cushingism.

ARCHBISHOP VIGANO IS STILL A CUSHINGITE

Archbishop Carlo Vigano still doesn’t get it. He is interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, like Pope Benedict.It is Cushingism which creates the break with EENS and so also the non separation of Church and State.

ANGELICUM AND JOHN LATERAN UNIVERSITY USE CUSHINGISM ONLY

At the University of St.Thomas Aquinas ( Angelicum ) Rome, the professors who interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, with Cushingism,include Michelt,Stancati,Weimann,Destivelle,Keramidas,Buckles, Bonino, Sullivan, Blankenhorn and Giordano.

At the John Lateran University, Rome the professors who interpret Vatican Council II etc., with the Irrational Premise, with Cushingism, include, Tangorra, Fuss, Nardi,Zak,Ferri, Viola and Chenaux.

IGNATIUS PRESS IS OBSOLETE

Fr.Fessio and Mark Brumley do not deny it.Books published by Ignatius Press only interpret Vatican Council II etc with Cushingism.Since they are unethical with Cushingism there distribution must stop. These books are obsolete.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.westmeathindependent.ie/2022/11/02/athlone-born-bishop-apologises-for-controversial-comments-of-listowel-priest/

FRIDAY, MAY 19, 2023

Francis Gives Non-Catholics A Feast Day! - Blatant Heresy

MAY 15, 2023

Pope Francis must choose martyrdom like the first 100 popes

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/pope-francis-must-choose-martyrdom-like.html

 JANUARY 9, 2021

Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism. This is great discovery

 Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism. This is great discovery. -Lionel Andrades