Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Modernists conclude their conference on modernism in Rome.Talks in the abstract have nothing new : Feeneyite-Cushing issue the cause of their modernism is avoided





The modernists have concluded their conference on modernism.Reports show that their talks in the abstract  have not said anything new.Prudently they have not dealt with the Feeneyism-Cushingism issue. It would expose their politically correct Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, all the Catechisms, the Nicene Creed etc. 
-Lionel Andrades

 JUNE 23, 2018


Modernist Mattei is not affirming the faith and discussing modernism at a conference he has organised in Rome today

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/modernist-mattei-is-not-affirming-faith.html



UNE 23, 2018

Featured Image


Problem of LifeSiteNews' Catholic editors and correspondents interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. This is modernism today

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/problem-of-lifesitenews-catholic.html



JUNE 23, 2018

Modernist Traditionalists will criticize modernism today since it is politically correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/modernist-traditionalists-will_23.html




JUNE 23, 2018

Looking at Vatican Council II with the Feeneyite,Cushingite model will change our way of doing catechesis and evangelisation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/looking-at-vatican-council-ii-with.html


JUNE 23, 2018



Modernist Traditionalists will criticize modernism today since it is politically correct








JUNE 20, 2018


Modernists will speak on modernism at Lepanto Foundation conference this week http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/modernists-will-speak-on-modernism-at.html








JUNE 22, 2018

Conference speakers tomorrow in Rome will re-cycle the same politically correct nonsense and prepare to do the same in 2019. They have been at it for the last few years http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/conference-speakers-tomorrow-in-rome.html


Here is Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 and Unitatis Reintigratio 3) interpreted with Feeneyism : the Cushingite passages are removed or highlighted


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/here-is-vatican-council-ii-ad-gentes-7.html

Repost : Work of Mercy - To the Aborted

 APRIL 18, 2018

Work of Mercy - To the Aborted



WORK OF MERCY - TO THE ABORTED



WORK OF MERCY - TO THE ABORTED

This man in Rio bathes, dresses and buries aborted babies found discarded at an abortion clinic.



https://gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

Repost : Why do you use the words 'visible' and 'invisible' ?: It is because others are using it unknown to them

JUNE 16, 2014

Why do you use the words 'visible' and 'invisible' ?: It is because others are using it unknown to them

Why do you use the words 'visible' and 'invisible' I am asked.
I refer to invisible and visible cases since most people are unaware. They are  using the concept 'visible' when talking about Catholic salvation. It is they who first use the irrationality of  visible exceptions. So I explain  the difference between visible and invisible exceptions.
They tell me that all do not need to enter the Catholic Church but only those who know about Jesus and the Church. In other words those who know and do not know are VISIBLE to us on earth. We know these cases in real life.
Then they say that every one needs to enter the Catholic Church except for those in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. In other words these cases are VISIBLE to us in real life. We know cases in 2014 saved with the baptism of desire etc . So they are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Then they say every one does not need to enter the Church and all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. What has all who are saved, are saved through Jesus and the Church, have to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Again it is inferred subtly that there are known cases saved without the baptism of water in other religions. They are VISIBLE to us . So all do not need to enter the Church for salvation.
Whenever someone says there are exceptions he is implying that there are VISIBLE exceptions.
They say Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for denying the baptism of desire. In other words, he would not accept a VISIBLE baptism of desire.
They say Nostra Aetate 2 is a revolution in the Catholic Church since it contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salusA person can be saved without the baptism of water and with ' a ray of the Truth' . In other words ' a ray of the Truth' is a VISIBLE exception.If it was not VISIBLE it would obviously not be an exception.
Similarly they say UR 3 has changed the Catholic Church's teachings on ecumenism. Now a Protestant can be saved in 'imperfect communion with the Church'. In other words these cases are VISIBLE in the present times, we can name some one saved in imperfect communion with the Church.
They ask  why do you use the VISIBLE and INVISIBLE distinction ?
It is because just about every one is using it  and doing so irrationally and unaware of it.-Lionel Andrades

Repost : Does the Mandatum of the Bishop ask Dominicans to say there are known exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church in 2014 ?

APRIL 12, 2014

Does the Mandatum of the Bishop ask Dominicans to say there are known exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church in 2014 ?


Sister Mary SarahI  sent Sister Mary Sarah Galbraith, the President of Aquinas College, Nashville, USA the following blog post, a few days back:-
Dominican priests like Sister Mary Sarah, O.P will say 'they support the Catholic Church’s teachings'.

 

There are so many questions not clarified.What is the theology being taught at Aquinas College. Is it rational ? Is it a rejection of St.Thomas Aquinas' teaching on salvation ?.

1. Would she interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 as saying that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church i.e all need to enter the Church as through a door (CCC 846,AG 7) and all need faith and baptism (AG 7) ?

2. Does she consider CCC 847 and 848 an exception to CCC 846 i.e there are known exceptions to all needing to enter the Church. Those saved in invincible ignorance and who are now in Heaven are also visible to us in 2014 on earth. So every one does not have to enter the Church or do all people need to enter the Church in 2014 with no known exceptions , for salvation ?

3. This would mean when she meets a non Catholic she knows that he is oriented to Hell since the Church says so (AG 7, CCC 846) and she would not know of any exception in 2014 ?

Sr. Jane Dominic Laurel O.P teaches theology 'according to the Catholic Church.'Does the Catholic Church teach that all Americans need to convert into the Catholic Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell ?

2. We are concerned with the whole person.
To say that Aquinas College is a Catholic school is to understand faith as light and not as restriction. This light is shed on all areas of the curriculum but not in a way that is unnatural, superimposed or intolerant of other beliefs. Faith and reason are not in opposition but in actuality they are considered complementary aspects of reality.-Why Acquinas College? (1)
 
'Faith and reason are not in opposition but in actuality they are considered complementary aspects of reality'
 
Reason tells us that we cannot see the dead who are now saved in Heaven. We do not know any one saved with invincible ignorance etc.So how can these cases be an exception to our Catholic Faith which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. So does Aquinas College teach that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church and all need to be visible members of the Church with 'faith and baptism' ?
 
'The theology faculty at Aquinas is united in its vision of the Church and her teachings. In accordance with the document Ex Corde Ecclesiae every teacher of theology has the Mandatum (official authorization) from the local bishop.'
 
Does the Mandatum of the Bishop expect the Dominicans to teach that there are known exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church in 2014 ? 
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
 
 

Faculty Directory

ADMINISTRATION

Sister Mary Sarah Galbraith, O.P., M.Ed.
President of Aquinas College
(615) 297-7545 x423
srmsarah@aquinascollege.edu
Sister Mary Bendyna, O.P., Ph.D.
Provost and Vice President for Academics
Office of Academics
(615) 297-7545 x438
srmary@aquinascollege.edu

Sister Mary Cecilia Goodrum, O.P., M.Ed.
Vice President for Student Life
(615) 297-7545 x412
srmcecilia@aquinascollege.edu

William C. Smart, Ph.D.Associate Provost and Interim Director of Institutional Research
Office of Academics
(615) 297-7545 x478
smartb@aquinascollege.edu
Sister Elizabeth Anne Allen, O.P., Ed.D.Director of the Center for Catholic EducationSchool of Education(615) 297-7545 x471
 
Sister Margaret Andrew Baker, O.P.Director of Secondary EducationInstructor, Secondary EducationSchool of Education(615) 297-7545 x472
 
Sister Mary RoseBingham, O.P.Director of CatecheticsOffice of Catechetics(615) 297-7545 x625
 
 
Richard H. Bulzacchelli, S.T.D.Associate Professor, TheologySchool of Arts & Sciences(615) 297-7545 x402
Kari L. Byard Assistant to the Vice President for AcademicsAdjunct, Information SystemsSchool of Arts & Sciences(615) 297-7545 x449
Sister Matthew Marie Cummings, O.P., Ed.D.Professor, EducationSchool of Education(615) 297-7545 x455
 
 
 

Same Catechism of the Catholic Church but different interpretations

Repost : Doug Lawrence's webblog is sectarian on Islam: also omits Catholic teaching on Vatican Council II

NOVEMBER 18, 2013

Doug Lawrence's webblog is sectarian on Islam: also omits Catholic teaching on Vatican Council II

On Doug Lawrence's webblog the link Info on Islam should have a report which says the Catholic Church teaches that Islam is not a path to salvation according to Vatican Council II, only, when an irrational premise is not used in the interpretation of the Council.When the premise is used there is confusion.
 
When an irrational premise is used then it contradictsextra ecclesia nulla salusand the Syllabus of Errors.There follows a hermeneutic of rupturewith past teachings of the Church.Without the irrational premise, Nostra Aetate 2, and Vatican Council II in general, is in agreement with St.John Damascene and the other saints.
Being able to see on earth those saved in Heaven( a false premise) creates a liberal interpretation of Islam and the other religions.
Doug Lawrence's webblog also comes across as sectarian on Islam. Since it only gives the Sunni version of Islam. It omits the Ahmediyyas and other sects understanding of their religion.
It also does not mention the persecution of Catholics and Muslims under the teachings of Mohammad and Islam.
 
Aisha Bibi is in a jail in Sunni territory when even Aga Khanis, Ahmediyyas and Bohris can be arrested for emphasizing in public certain aspects of their Muslim religion. They would be in jail according to the official teachings of Islam.
-Lionel Andrades
 

Repost : Opus Dei appoints Mons.Angel Rodriguez Luno as Dean of Theology : prudent priest will not affirm the Catholic Faith.

 NOVEMBER 1, 2013

Opus Dei appoints Mons.Angel Rodriguez Luno as Dean of Theology : prudent priest will not affirm the Catholic Faith.

At the Opus Dei university in Rome, the new Dean of Theology is Mons Angel Rodrigues Luno.Readers of this blog will recall that I had asked him two questions about the Catholic Faith. He refused to answer  them in an e-mail reply  to me. He was the head of the Department of Dogmatic Theology at Opus Dei's University of the Holy Cross.
 
Angel Rodriguez Luño
At issue was the doctorate in theology given or  to be given toFr. Francesco Giordano whose  subject of study was  outside the church there is no salvation.
 
The Dean of Theology seems to have been protecting this career or other interests and is denying the Catholic Faith by not affirming it.
 
Fr. Francesco Giordano was given a Masters Degree in Theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) Rome by the Rector  Fr. Charles Morerod O.P. Bishop Charles Morerod, now bishop of Lausanne, Switzerland  also personally approved the Italian priest' s thesis with the error of assuming there are known  exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra eclesiam nulla salus.
 
Opus Dei  permitted Fr.Giordano, a good priest,  to work for a doctorate  since the same error, unkowingly , is being made by other faculty members.The Opus Dei faculty taught the same error a few years back to a  former Rector of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, Fr.Massimilano dei Gaspari FFI.
 
Fr.Gaspari now agrees that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are possibilities, probabilities  and not defacto exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation.He was never taught this at the university.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 

Repost : Rabbi teaches error at the Angelicum

NOVEMBER 1, 2013

Rabbi teaches error at the Angelicum

The Angelicum has employed a rabbi who is teaching errors to Catholic students.
 
At the University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum), Rome  the rabbi who teaches ecumenism, will not admit, it seems, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma  extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He will not teach that there are no known exceptions to the dogma mentioned  in Vatican Council II.
 
Vatican Council II does not contradict the traditional teaching on ecumenism and other religions but he is not going to teach it.
 
The Catholic Church's teaching on ecumenism, the subject he teaches, has not changed.He will not admit it.
 
This rabbi also protested to  Rorate Caeili (New Catholic) when this issue  was discussed by Rorate.Since then Rorate  has maintained a politically correct taboo on this subject.
 
Pope John Paul II's Ut Unum Sint tells us that Christian communities and churches must accept the authority of the pope and be united with the Catholic Church.
 
Vatican Council II (AG 7) says all need faith and baptism  for salvation.This includes  all Christians  who do not have Catholic Faith. For salvation  Protestants , Pentecostals  etc  need to enter the Catholic Church,'as through a door'.(CCC 846, AG 7 etc). It is possible that a Protestant can be saved in imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3). However we do not know any such case in 2013  for UR 3 to be an exception to AG 7 ( all need faith and baptism). So those saved in imperfect communion  with the Church (UR 3) , seeds of the Word (AG  11) and elements of sanctification and truth (LG 8) are not known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So when the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, mentioned  implicit desire  and being saved in invincible ignorance, this was not an exception  to 'the dogma', the 'infallible teching' also mentioned in the Letter.Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for disobedience according to the Letter. The Church did not  ask him  to recant  since he was not in heresy. It was the Archbishop and the Jesuits in Boston who really were in heresy for claiming there were known exceptions to a defined dogma, even when they could not name these exceptions.
 
The rabbi supports his error by citing liberal sources at the Vatican's Council for Christian Unity, who also  make this objective error. This can be seen in  an article/talk given by Cardinal Walter Kaspar and posted on the website of theCouncil for Christian Unity. Cardinal Kaspar, the report shows, assumes Pope Pius XII  faulted  Fr. Leonard Feeney  , for his 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma.This theory  could have originated in a Freemason Lodge.
 
Since the Letter does not say that implicit desire etc are known to us in the present times or that they are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
Cardinal Kaspar assumes that there are known exceptions and then builds his theology on this objective error.Vatican Council II appears 'ambigous' and liberal for him and the traditional teaching on ecumenism and other religions has been discarded. He is using the visible- dead theology of Cardinal Richard Cushing. The rabbi and the faculty at the Angelicum are doing the same.This is repeating a lie even after being infomed.
-Lionel Andrades

Repost :DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

 OCTOBER 16, 2013


DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

Rev. Fr.P. Stefano Visintin OSB, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at the Pontifical University St.Anselm, Rome says all non Catholics need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation and there are no known exceptions.This is the teaching of the Catholic Church.
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are possibilities, he said, but are not known exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation.
Prof. Visintin was speaking with me yesterday (Oct.15,2013) at the university where I had gone to seek information on Subiaco, the Benedictine retreat center near Rome.
Fr.Stefano who has been appointed for the second term as the Dean of Theology affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and said that none of us know of any case this year saved outside the church.
I asked him again if he was saying all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics in Rome and elsewhere need to enter the Church for salvation. He replied all who know about Jesus and the Church need to enter."All who know?" and not 'all in general'I needed to clarify?.Since we don't know who knows or does not know and will be saved . This is known only to God.
He clarified that all with no exception in the present times need to convert visibly into the Church for salvation.
I asked him if this is what is being taught at the university.He answered in the affirmative.
The Dean of Theology was presenting traditional Benedictine theology and spirituality and throwing light on a controversial theological issue in Catholic circles these days.Professors of theology at pontifical universities in Rome claim there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This factual error of the dead-saved being visible to us is being made at the Angelicum University, Rome by Fr. Robert Christian O.P . This is also tyhe factual error of a professor of ecclesiology, at the Urbaniana University, Rome by Sandra Mazzoloni. It is also there in the two  Departments, of Missiology and Theology of Religions, at the Gregorian University.It would seem they can see ghosts in parks and streets here! At the Urbaniana University Sandra Mazzollini calls this ' a development of doctrine ' , according to the annual Urbaniana Handbook of university courses.

None of them can name any non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance etc yet even at the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) seminary in Econe, Switzerland this error is made by Fr. Jean Marie Gleize. The traditionalist professor of ecclesiology refers to an exceptional way of salvation(via eccezionale) when we don't know of any exceptions.
Fr.Visintin contradicts these professors of theology and also the International Theological Commission, Vatican(ITC). The ITC indicates on its website that there are known exceptions to the the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as interpreted by Fr.Leonard Feeney.
This Benedictine priest is also correcting the general understanding of Vatican Council II, interpreted with irrational Cushingism. He is saying indirectly, that Vatican Council II does not contradict  the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities and churches. The 'old ecclesiology' has not changed since there are no known  exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.This is a breakthrough for reconciliation with the sedevacantists (CMRI, MHFM and others) who can now accept a traditional Vatican Council II without the premise of being able to see the dead who are visible exceptions to traditional teaching.It has also created a new opportunity for Vatican-SSPX reconciliation talks.
Meeting Fr.Visintin was a welcome expèrience.It seemed like a gift for me from my favourite saint, on her feast day, Teresa of Avila.
-Lionel Andrades
Subprior:
P. Stefano Visintin, O.S.B.
vicepriore@santanselmo.org

Repost : Reuters :Propaganda on SSPX and Vatican Council II : Priebke attended Sunday Mass

OCTOBER 17, 2013


Propaganda on SSPX and Vatican Council II : Priebke attended Sunday Mass

There are reports which mention  'a funeral Mass celebrated by a splinter Catholic group opposed to Vatican outreach to Jews,' for Erich Priebke.This is the usual propaganda and hate directed by the left against the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX).
The SSPX has clarified often that they do not hate Jews but their opponents are referring to 'a political hate' legalised by them and expressed in intolerant leftist laws.
On the contrary Vatican Council II supports the SSPX when it indicates Jews and other non Catholics need 'faith and baptism' for salvation (AG 7) and they all need to enter the Catholic Church, visibly, 'as through a door' (AG 7, CCC 846).
Funerals in Italy have become political. The Cardinal Bagnasco, the President of the Italian Catholic Bishop's Conference  had to offer a funeral Mass  for an Italian Communist priest, who rejected the teachings of the Catholic Church in public.He was supported by the Communist party in Italy whose exponents were protesting the funeral given to Priebke, as if Catholic funerals and teachings are important for them.
Similarly the pro-abortion and pro Left new Mayor of Rome opposed the funeral for Erich Priebke as did the leading leftist rabbi of Rome , who welcomed the funeral of Cardinal Carlo Martini S.J.
The funeral for Cardinal Martini was approved by Pope Benedict XVI in as much he approved, that Jews do not have to convert in the present times, after there was a political and miliitary threat before him.
It's unfortunate that the leftist media still interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, assuming that there are known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which is opposed by many of the people who wanted Erich Priebke not to have a funeral Mass.

In a statement, the Society has said, it is reported, that  it agreed to perform the funeral at the family's request because "no matter what the guilt or sins" anyone who dies reconciled with God and the Church "has the right to celebrate Mass and a funeral".
-Lionel Andrades