The Forza Nuova political party according to their website adhere to
eight points and so oppose the Left. In keeping with their manifesto they could announce that they
support Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. For then LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II would refer to only hypothetical
cases. This is not how the Left interprets the Council.
LG 8 ,14, 16 etc would become invisible cases for the FN while they are presently
visible cases for the Vatican which follows the Left on this issue.
That LG 8, 14 and 16 refer to only theoretical cases in 2023 is common
sense. But the Left is dishonest. It interprets them as physically visible
examples of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present
times. In this way exceptions are created for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus. The Athanasius Creed is made obsolete for the whole Church. This is the
ruse of the Masons.
The whole Church is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and
this is approved by the Zionists.
With Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible
ignorance) referring to visible examples of salvation outside the Church in
1949-2023, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, according to the Fourth
Lateran Council (1215), is set aside in the Church.
So Traditional Mission is made obsolete too. Since it is said that there
is known salvation outside the Catholic Church, according to Vatican Council II
(LG 14, LG 16 etc interpreted irrationally). So then it is asked why must everyone enter the Catholic Church for salvation.
Why have mission? The Church no more claims that it has exclusive salvation after Vatican
Council II (interpreted irrationally) it is said. They why must there be
mission to non Catholics?
In the same way it said that since there are known cases of non
Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times; people who have been
saved without faith and the baptism of water, then why must we proclaim the Social Reign of
Christ the King in all politics?
So it is important for the FN to affirm Vatican Council II, interpreted
only rationally. It must be asked: where are are known people saved outside the Church this year? Who has seen someone saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire? No one. If someone is saved as such he or she would be in Heaven. These are invisible cases for us human beings. So they cannot be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.
Presently the understanding of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed
recited at the Latin Mass is different for the FN members and for me. This is
the situation in the Church. We do not have unity on the Creeds. This is the same problem at Mass in Italian. This has to be
corrected by the FN.
The FN members could go along with the Catholics in front of the Nuncio’s
office in Paris, where they seek liberty for the Latin Mass. The FN could demand there that the
Nuncio in Paris and the Archbishop of Paris interpret Vatican Council II and
the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and honestly. This will bring
the entire Church in France, including those who go for Mass in the vernacular,
back to the ecclesiology of the 1962 Missal. The Catholic Church returns to
Tradition with one simple move - interpreting Magisterial Documents rationally. The FN must deal with this issue and express it on its website. -Lionel Andrades
https://www.forzanuova1997.it/
Posts
