Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Amusement Park (Roller Coaster) Accidents 2016 HD Caught On Camera



Like the Fatima visionaries, we should meditate on hell - Donal Anthony Foley


Reflecting on the horrors  of hell can help us to avoid ending up there

What are we to make of the vision of hell which was seen by the Fatima children on July 13, 1917?

The vision was revealed in Sister Lucia’s Third Memoir – which was written in the summer of 1941 – when she stated that she was going to reveal the first two parts of the Fatima secret, and that the first part of this secret was the vision of hell.
This is how she describes it:
“Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repellent likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent.”
After this horrifying vision, Sister Lucia went on to say:
“This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.”
Clearly, this vision was very brief, but very powerful and indeed terrifying. Sr Lucia then says:
“We then looked up at Our Lady, who said to us so kindly and so sadly: ‘You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.’ ”
Our Lady then went on to outline what needed to be done if souls would indeed be saved and peace given to the world – that is the second part of the secret.
The first point to make about this vision is that it strongly affirms the existence of hell, a fact which has been downplayed by some Catholics in recent years; the vision seen by the children, though, and the whole of Catholic tradition are opposed to that type of thinking. And in addition, Jesus mentions hell a number of times in the New Testament, and in quite graphic terms.
For example, in St Mark’s Gospel, after describing various sins that would make a person worthy of going to hell, such as corrupting little children, or using parts of the body for sinful purposes, he says: “And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out; it is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.” (Mark 9:42-48)
In St Matthew’s Gospel, in the parable of the sower, Jesus uses the weeds and the wheat of the parable as symbolic of the lost and the saved, saying: “Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn” (Matthew 13:30).
There is a reference to the traditional concept of hell here in the fact that the weeds are burned.
Later on, Jesus explained the meaning of this parable to his disciples, saying:
“Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the close of the age. The Son of man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all evildoers, and throw them into the furnace of fire; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.” (Matt 13:40-42)
So from these and other scriptural passages we get a general picture of hell as a place of eternal punishment, a punishment involving fire, a never-ending fire, and also as a place of remorse and despair.
Thus the thought of hell is meant to be a sobering one for us, and one we should take seriously. The vision of hell certainly made a very strong impression on the Fatima seers, and particularly on Jacinta, as Sister Lucia further relates:
“The vision of hell filled her with horror to such a degree, that every penance and mortification was as nothing in her eyes, if it could only prevent souls from going there.”
In fact, hell became a preoccupation of young Jacinta. One time she exclaimed:
“Oh, hell! hell! How sorry I am for the souls who go to hell! And the people down there, burning alive, like wood in the fire!”
Lucia tells us that, she would then kneel down with her hands joined, and recite the prayer that Our Lady had taught them: “O my Jesus! Forgive us, save us from the fire of hell. Lead all souls to heaven, especially those who are most in need.”
At other times, she asked her cousin: “Why doesn’t Our Lady show hell to sinners? If they saw it, they would not sin, so as to avoid going there! You must tell Our Lady to show hell to all the people. You’ll see how they will be converted.”
Before she died, Jacinta spent some time at an orphanage in Lisbon. The Sister in charge, who was known as Mother Godinho, was able to talk to Jacinta. In some cases, it seems that the things Jacinta spoke of came from Our Lady, but in others they resulted from the infused wisdom with which the little girl was gifted. In fact, Mother Godinho asked Jacinta about this, saying, ‘Who taught you these things?’ to which she responded, ‘Our Lady, but some of them I thought myself. I love to think.’
Jacinta reportedly told Mother Godinho that many people went to hell because of “sins of the flesh”. She also apparently said that certain fashions would be introduced which would be very offensive to Our Lord.
Clearly we are living in a time when sexual immorality and immodest fashions are widespread, so these points very much apply to our age.
We are not likely to see either heaven or hell in this life, but in the first part of the Fatima secret we have been given a clear reiteration of hell’s existence and horror. Like Jacinta, we need to mediate on hell – in our case so as to ensure that we don’t end up going there.
Donal Anthony Foley is the author of a number of books on Marian  Apparitions, and maintains a related web site at www.theotokos.org.uk. He has also a written a time-travel/adventure book for young people


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/like-fatima-visionaries-we-should.html



Jesus dismissed the crowds and went into the house.
His disciples approached him and said,
“Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field.”
He said in reply, “He who sows good seed is the Son of Man,
the field is the world, the good seed the children of the Kingdom.
The weeds are the children of the Evil One,
and the enemy who sows them is the Devil.
The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels.
Just as weeds are collected and burned up with fire,
so will it be at the end of the age.
The Son of Man will send his angels,
and they will collect out of his Kingdom
all who cause others to sin and all evildoers.
They will throw them into the fiery furnace,
where there will be wailing and grinding of teeth.
Then the righteous will shine like the sun
in the Kingdom of their Father.
Whoever has ears ought to hear.”



MT 13:36-43 Gospel July 26, 2016 

Memorial of Saints Joachim and Anne, Parents of the Blessed Virgin Mary








The entrance it seems to me  was similar to a very long  and narrow alleyway, like an  oven, low and dark and  confined; the floor seemed  to me to consist of dirty, muddy water emitting foul  stench and swarming with  putrid vermin...The bodily pains were so unbearable  that though I had suffered  excruciating ones in this life  and according to what doctors  say, the worst that can be suffered on earth for all my nerves were shrunken when  I was paralyzed, plus many other sufferings of many kinds  that I endured and even some  as I said, caused by the devil, these were all nothing  in comparison with the ones I experienced there...-St.Teresa of Avila's description of Hell.

http://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/St.%20Teresa%20of%20Avila%20combat%20with%20





The Priest who spoke with Jesus Christ! - A Must See Video!! - [Full Length]


__________________


Description of hell -Medugorje visionaries

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/description-of-hell-medugorje.html
________________________________________________

Sister Josefa Menendez's Description of Hell

http://christtotheworld.blogspot.it/2010/04/sister-josefa-menendezs-description-of.html
______________________________________
“I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell (...). I would have died at the very sight of these tortures if the omnipotence of God had not supported me. Let the sinner know that he will be tortured throughout all eternity, through those senses which he used to sin. I am writing this at the command of God, so that no soul may find an excuse by saying there is no hell, or that nobody has ever been there, and so no one can say what it is like (...). I noticed that in hell there are most souls that did not believe it exists. I could hardly recover from the fright. How terribly souls suffer there!” (Diary, 741).-St.Faustina Kowalski http://www.divinemercysunday.com/vision.htm
___________________________________________
There was a certain rich  man, who was clothed  in purple and fine  linen; and feasted sumptuously every day.
 And there was a certain beggar, named Lazarus, who lay at his  gate, full of sores,Desiring to be filled  with the crumbs that fell from the rich man' s table, and no one did give  him; moreover the dogs came, and licked his sores.
 And it came to pass, that  the beggar died, and was carried by the angels  into Abraham' s bosom.
 And the rich man also  died: and he was buried in hell. And lifting up his eyes when he was in torments, he saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom: And he cried, and said:
 Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send  Lazarus, that he may  dip the tip of his finger in water, to cool  my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame.
 And Abraham said to him: Son, remember that thou  didst receive good things  in thy lifetime, and likewise Lazarus evil things, but now he is comforted; and thou art tormented. 



And besides all this, between us  and you, there  is fixed a great chaos: so that they who would pass from hence to you, cannot, nor from thence come hither. And he said: Then, father, I beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father' s house,
 for I have five brethren, That he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torments. And Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. But he said: No, father Abraham: but if one went to them from the dead, they will do penance. 

And he said to him: If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead. -Luke :19-31,The Rich Man (Dives) and Lazarus.
________________________________

Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf are not speaking with clarity.It needs to be said that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church and Vatican Council II says this. I repeat Vatican Council II says so


Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf are not speaking with clarity.They need to say that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church and that Vatican Council II says this. I repeat Vatican Council II says so.
They need to tell all non Catholics that the Church teaches in Vatican Council II, that they need faith and baptism to avoid Hell.This is the teaching of the Church in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church,the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors, all interpreted with hypothetical cases being hypothetical, with LG 16 being invisible and not visible, with LG 8, UR 3 etc referring to implicit and not explicit cases and NA 2 referring to cases explicit only for God and hypothetical for us humans.
They are not saying it. They are not proclaiming the Faith.
Instead their position on other religions is the same as the liberals and they are wrongly blaming Vatican Council II.
They need to quote Scripture John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.Instead they repeat the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which was repeated in Vatican Council II i.e hypothetical cases are interpreted as not being hypothethical.In other words, for the both of them, there are exceptions to John 3:5 ( all need the baptism of water for salvation) and Mark 16:16( those who do not beleive will be condemned). For both of them there are  exceptions to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16,  since it is assumed there is a personally known case of a catechumen who desired the baptism of water but died before receiving it and is now in Heaven.As if someone could know. Someone could see him in Heaven and on earth.
There is no such case.This was a strawman argument from the very beginning.
The popes and saints  were referring to a hypothetical case just as we do when we say that a person can be saved with perfect contrition, if the Sacrament of Confession was not available.But we do not and cannot know of any such case personally.
The hypothetical cases of baptism of desire(BOD) and blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I),all without the baptism of water, were considered explicit and objectivly known by the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. This was a mistake.Cardinal Marchetti Selvaggiani who issued the Letter(1949) mixed up what was invisible as being visible.  Vatican Council has repeated this mistake when it refers to BOD( LG 14) and I.I ( LG 16) with reference to the dogma EENS; with reference to all needing faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7, LG 14).These are 'zero cases' in our reality, so they cannot be 'practical exceptions' to the old ecclesiology based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
For Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, BOD and I.I refer to explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS and the need for all, with no known exceptions, to have faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7, LG 14). So they both these days cannot clearly say that all non Catholics; all non Christians are on the way to Hell in 2016, unless they die within the Catholic Church, with faith and baptism.
They are part of the confusion in the Catholic Church. Since they have accepted the new theology which has created new doctrines and so has rejected exclusive salvation in the Church.
We have identified the error.Now they can correct it.
They can interpret Vatican Council II by making the transition from explicit for us BOD and I.I to implicit for us BOD and I.I. They can switch from known cases being referred to in LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3 to unknown cases.They can switch from objectively visible cases being mentioned in LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3 etc,there present interpretation,  to hypothetical cases for us , which would be objectively known only to God.
Once they make this transition they are still affirming all the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church including Vatican Council II itself,however the interpretation is rational and without the new theology.
They can then clearly announce the Catholic position on other religions, according to magisterial documents, not interpreted with physically seen and known cases of BOD (LG 14), I.I ( LG 16), UR 3, NA 2, LG 8  etc.They would be affirming the old ecclesiology and no one could accuse them of denying Vatican Council II or BOD and I.I.
Once they speak the truth clearly then they can watch the reaction from non Catholics and the political Left.There will be a world wide storn.At the least, it would be an education for non Catholics and a good catechesis for Catholics.Presently the non Catholic view on salvation is not being challenged by Catholics.
Cardinal Burke and Fr.Zuhlsdorf statements and views this week are polite and meaningless. It is as if they are lost and do not have the answers.It is the same with so many Catholic bloggers.
-Lionel Andrades

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf repeats Marchetti's error on the baptism of blood




Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus

May be someone who is in contact with Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider could ask them these two questions and send me their response

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/may-be-someone-who-is-in-contact-with.html

Cardinal Burke will not affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.If he did Vatican Council II would not be a break with the dogma EENS according to the 16th century missionaries http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/cardinal-burke-is-unable-to-affirm.html

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2016/07/26-july-canon-law-conference-speculum-iustitiae/