SEPTEMBER 6, 2018
Popes and cardinalds like the traditionalists misinterpret magisterial documents like the Catechism of Pope Pius X, Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) etc
SEPTEMBER 5, 2018
Popes and cardinalds like the traditionalists misinterpret magisterial documents like the Catechism of Pope Pius X
AUGUST 20, 2018
The Church of the ecclesiastics will not say that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston is magisterial on EENS, the CDF made an objective mistake in the Letter(1949) : traditioinalists too are part of the false church
There is a doctrinal mess which is being propped by 'the false Church' within the true Church, both existing together in the Catholic Church.
The Church, comprised of the present two popes and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, are opposed to 'the Church' of magisterial documents, interpreted without an irrational premise.
The Church of the ecclesiastics reject the Church of Magisterial documents including Vatican Council II, which are in harmony with Tradition (past ecclesiology,Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return, etc).
So 'the Church' of the ecclesiastics is opposed to traditional doctrine and theology, with which Vatican Council II etc can be interpreted. Even after being informed the present Church of ecclesiastics will not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the Magiseterium for example, in the 16th century.
They will not say that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston is magisterial on EENS and that the CDF made an objective and factual mistake in theLetter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
So this is the false church operating within the Catholic Church and the traditionalists are a part of it.They use the same false New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.With political correctness with the Left which belongs to Satan, they avoid the rational and alternative interpretation of magisterial documents(Vatican Council II, Catechismse etc).
Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara have written books on Vatican Council II, interpreted according to the false church.For them it is obligatory to use the false premise, to create a rupture with Tradition.Yet they both will criticize the false church within the Catholic Church, when they are a part to it and contribute to it even after being informed.
It is easy for them to write books and give talks. They like this.But they will not affirm traditional mission based on EENS and Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational reasoning.They allow the doctrinal confusion to remain within the Church.They remind me of the man whom Jesus asked to sell all his things and to follow Him and he could not do it, since he was a rich man.
Ferrara and Mattei remained silent when Pope Benedict in March 2016 and Cardinal Ladaria in March 1,2018 chose to be the false church. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria wanted to create a rupture with Tradition. Similarly Archbishop Guido Pozzo knows there is an alternative choice , a hermeneutic of continuity with the past, but like Archbishop Augustine Di Noia at Ecclesia Dei,he will not want to endorse Feeneyite EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.May be their priority is their careers and not telling the truth to Catholics.
They will not announce that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 used a false premise and so did Pope Benedict (March 2016, Avvenire) and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria(March 1, 2018, Placuet Press Conference).
They want the whole Church to follow the error and be the false church.-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________
__________________________________
AUGUST 19, 2018
The CDF is 'the Church' but Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise is also 'the Church' and the CDF does not affirm it.The Church of the ecclesiastics rejects 'the Church' of Magisterial documents
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-cdf-is-church-but-vatican-council.html
AUGUST 19, 2018
Catholics can start saying that Fr. Leonard Feeney's interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the official teaching of the Catholic Church when the false premise is not used
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/catholics-can-start-saying-that-fr.html
See the timing at 28:53 on this video. Cardinal Ladaria in answer to a question cites LG 8 as an exception to EENS.This is an objective error and it comes from the mistake the Church made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.How can unknown cases of being saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth'in other religions(LG 8) be practical exceptions to the dogma EENS or the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church? This is an objective mistake. It is a fact of life that we cannot see people saved in Heaven without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) which is needed for salvation.
AUGUST 18, 2018
Placuit Deo promotes an ecumenical Jesus and not Jesus according to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church,which did not separate Jesus from faith and baptism in the Church for salvation : Sandro Magister and Edward Pentin did not know
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/placuit-deo-promotes-ecumenical-jesus.html
AUGUST 17, 2018
Obligated to the Masons and the Left Pope Benedict, Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morani did not want to affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise. They did not truthfully interpret the Council without hypothetical cases being assumed to be objective people in the present times
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/obligated-to-masons-and-left-pope.html
AUGUST 17, 2018
Since the Church made an objective mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case, Placuit Deo could not affirm the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/since-church-made-objective-mistake-in.html
AUGUST 17, 2018
A factual error was made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and it has influenced the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/a-factual-error-was-made-in-fr-leonard.html
AUGUST 15, 2018
The CDF needs to apologize for the error in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.It has a direct bearing on how we interpret Vatican Council II. The Council becomes a rupture or continuity with the past
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-cdf-needs-to-apologize-for-error-in.html
AUGUST 16, 2018
It was based upon the error the CDF(Holy Office 1949) made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case that at the Placuit Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018 Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj interpreted Lumen Gentium 8 as being an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. : a correction needs to be made by the CDF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/it-was-based-upon-error-cdfholy-office.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/it-was-based-upon-error-cdfholy-office.html
Posts
