Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Pope Benedict XVI during his liturgy contradicts the Oath Against Modernism.



Benedict identifies the problem we face as a Church.  The Church’s identity has been “freaked out”, as it were, by the upheaval caused by the damage done to our sacred liturgical worship.-Fr.Z

________________________________________________________


NB: In his brief preface, above, Benedict says that if God is obscured, then our criteria for what is important shifts.  Relativism dominates us.  Where is our most regular and obvious, strengthening and informing meeting and attention with God?  Liturgy.  With out this constant formation and transformation, we have no idea who we are or what is important.-Fr.John Zuhlsdorf 
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2017/04/urgent-benedict-xvis-new-text-about-sacred-liturgy-the-russian-preface/

Image result for Photo Boston Heresy caseImage result for Photo Boston Heresy case

Kline 7

Feeney, along with many Catholic priests at the time,staunchly resisted modernist thinking and what he perceived to be the liberalization of Catholic doctrine. When ordained in 1938, he was required to take an  Oath Against  Modernism as proscribed by Pope Pius X, which stated: “
I wholly and entirely reject the falseinvention of the evolution of dogmas, whereby they pass from one meaning to a meaningother than that formerly held by the Church.”
Lionel: Last March 2016, Pope Benedict XVI, in the daily Avvenire stated, that extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. He said that the dogma had evolved with Vatican Council II.1 He meant  Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) assumed there are visible and known exceptions to the dogma EENS and he accepts this. So for him there is salvation outside the Church. LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, unlike for me, would refer to physically visible and known cases for Pope Benedict. This is modernism.He has changed the Catholic identity.Pope Benedict XVI during his liturgy contradicts the Oath Against Modernism.The same modernism is supported by the Society of St. Pius X and sedevacantist bishops and priests who have had their formation under Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.It is modernism during their liturgy.
The Oath Against Modernism is now meaningless. Even Bishop Athanasius Schneider who has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II, interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.He is a modernist at the Traditional Latin Mass.
-Lionel Andrades



1

 APRIL 17, 2017




The Boston Heresy Case refers to historic magisterial heresy in the Catholic Church : practical consequences in the archdiocese of Palermo, Italy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-boston-heresy-case-refers-to.html


http://www.corriere.it/cronache/17_aprile_15/benedetto-xvi-mater-ecclesiae-uomini-dio-perso-primato-4625e000-2217-11e7-807d-a69c30112ddd.shtml?refresh_ce-cp

One of the mantras in Transcendental Meditation is associated with Satanism.This is confirmed in research on Freemasonry by Fr.Paolo Siano F.I , of the Fransciscans of the Immaculate

 148

Transcendental Meditation


09:19

Contrasting the approaches of seeking enlightenment between Transcendental Meditation and that which is described by St. John of the Cross in his landmark book on mystical theology - Ascent of Mount Carmel Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/…/633925016684362

  Lionel L. Andrades2 minutes ago
I was a Catholic teacher of Transcendental Meditiation. I did a teacher's training course in Thailand and practised the TM Sidhi Advanced program.

Transcendenal Meditation(TM) takes you on to levels which are not Catholic. It also opens you to different entities. One of the mantras is associated with Satanism.This is confirmed in research conducted on Freemasonry by Fr.Paolo Siano F.I , of the Fransciscans of the Immaculate.
St.Teresa of Avila said that in contemplation do not lose the image of Jesus, hold on to it at all times when possible. With TM consciousness is left free and open to Satan, especially at times when there is no mantra and no thought; when one transcends the level of the intellect.
I have known f TM teachers who have married many times and their emotional lilfe was in disarray.They were addicted to vice and their were TM teachers in the TM Purusha program who were living together as homsexual friends.
Many people learn the technique for relaxation. However after a few weeks there are side effects, physical and mental, which the TM movement brushes off as 'stess release'.
I would not, as a Teacher of TM, who has given Yogic Flying(hoping) demonstrations in public, recommend Transcendental Meditation by Maharishi Maheshi yogi.
With TM at most you can experience the levels of the lower levels of consciousness in St.Teresa of Avila's explanation of the Seven Mansions in her classic The Interior Castle.To experience what Maharishi calls Unity Consciousness - one needs Jesus.

Archdiocese of Palermo please formally affirm Catholic doctrine for the religious and lay congregation of the diocese

Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, Archbishop of Palermo please issue a statement affirming the following Catholic doctrines in accord with the magisterial documents of the Catholic Church, including Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).If you cannot affirm the doctrines of the Catholic Faith as a bishop then according to Canon Law you have no right to be a bishop.Please ask for a replacement for the diocese of Palermo.
1.I Lionel Andrades, as a Catholic affirm that 'All Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other non Catholics,Protestants, Pentecostals,Orthodox Christians and other Christians, atheists and other non believers in God, need to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14 Vatican Council II)to avoid the fires of Hell and to go to Heaven .They all need to be incorporated into the Church with no known exceptions, according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus'.Please affirm this traditional  Catholic teaching in your archdiocese.
2.I, Lionel Andrades, as a Catholic affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Spes 22, Lumen Gentium 14 etc refer to  physically invisible cases; hypotetical cases and not people personally known in the present times.
Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please affirm this traditional doctrinal teaching of the Church.The issue here is doctrine and not pastoral approach or theological praxis.
3.I,Lionel Andrades affirm the Nicene Creed. When I say at Mass " I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' I mean one known baptism, the baptism of water.There are not three known  baptisms. The baptism of desire and blood cannot be administered like the baptism of water, they cannot be physically seen or repeated like the baptism of water.The baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are always physically invisible for us in 2017.Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please affirm this Catholic teaching  with rationality and advise every one in the diocese to do the same.
4.I, Lionel Andrades, accept the baptism of desire as being a hypothetical case, irrespective if it is theoretically followed by the baptism of water or excludes it.The baptism of desire is always invisible and never visible for us human beings.So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017. An alleged possibility in the past cannot  be an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and baptism in 2017.
Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please clarify that they affirm the baptism of desire as being invisible and not visible and that it never was and nor is an exception to the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,as it was guided by the Holy Spirit and the magisterium in  past centuries, for example, the missionaries of the 16th century.
5.I, Lionel Andrades do not affirm Vatican Council II with Cushingism, in which the baptism of desire is always visible and so it becomes an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is heresy.Yet this is the heretical doctrine being taught in the Archdiocese of Palermo.Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please formally reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism and clarify this issue for their lay congregations and diocesan religious.
If Archbishop Corrado Palermo cannot affirm these teachings of the Catholic Church then could the archdiocese confirm it. Could they confirm that they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.
If Archbishop Corrado Palermo and the Auxiliary bishops of the diocese cannot affirm Catholic doctrines interpreted with rationality then for the sake of unity in the diocese, could they in conscience resign and ask for a replacement; ask for a bishop or priest, who affirms the Catholic Faith with integrity.
-Lionel Andrades



TERMS EXPLAINED

A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.


A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism (so does the SSPX).

I use Feeneyism and Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Muller, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Mark Pirvanus, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond use Cushingism.


For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For the Dimond Brothers extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Feeneyite but they reject the baptism of desire which is Cushingite for them.
For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Bostonis Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it.

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

The present magisterium separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.I do not.


Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.

Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance. 

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational. 

Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS. 

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell). 

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite): It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions. 

Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite): It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter. 

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism

Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.

Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) : It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation. 

New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.


Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). 

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments. 
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).

Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water. 

Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
________________________
April 18, 2017

Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today : Abp.Corrado Lorefice interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/boston-heresy-of-magisterium-has.html


Image result for Photo of the Catholic cathedral in Palermo

Sit-in dei fedeli di Minutella davanti alla Curia: “Arcivescovo, lasci don Alessandro in parrocchia”
April 16, 2017

Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today : Abp.Corrado Lorefice interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism

The Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today. For example in Palermo, Italy the Archbishop is calling for unity based on heresy. He interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and expects the whole diocese to do the same.1



.

-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1.
 
April 17, 2017

The Boston Heresy Case refers to historic magisterial heresy in the Catholic Church : practical consequences in the archdiocese of Palermo, Italy

Marian Apparitions Of The 20th Century a message of urgency(Video)

465

Day 5 today - The Divine Mercy Novena

Image result for photo divine mercy

Day 5 - The Divine Mercy NovenaAudio/Video Version
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

"Today bring to Me THE SOULS OF THOSE WHO HAVE SEPARATED THEMSELVES FROM MY CHURCH, and immerse them in the ocean of My mercy. During My bitter Passion they tore at My Body and Heart, that is, My Church. As they return to unity with the Church, My wounds heal and in this way they alleviate My Passion."

Most Merciful Jesus, Goodness Itself, You do not refuse light to those who seek it of You. Receive into the abode of Your Most Compassionate Heart the souls of those who have separated themselves from Your Church. Draw them by Your light into the unity of the Church, and do not let them escape from the abode of Your Most Compassionate Heart; but bring it about that they, too, come to glorify the generosity of Your mercy.

Eternal Father, turn Your merciful gaze upon the souls of those who have separated themselves from Your Son's Church, who have squandered Your blessings and misused Your graces by obstinately persisting in their errors. Do not look upon their errors, but upon the love of Your own Son and upon His bitter Passion, which He underwent for their sake, since they, too, are enclosed in His Most Compassionate Heart. Bring it about that they also may glorify Your great mercy for endless ages.

Amen.

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.
Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet.