LifeSites News editor chooses heresy since it is politically correct now he focuses on the heresy of Pope Francis in a weekly new video

LifeSite News is to produce a video every week critical of Pope Francis.They accuse him of heresy.While John Henry Weston Editor of LifeSite News will not affirm Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) rationally and traditionally.This is heretical.
He chooses heresy since it is politically correct  and he cannot deny it. Instead he chooses to focus on the heresy of Pope Francis.

 Every Tuesday the Editor of LifeSite News is produce a video called the John Henry Weston Show.The theology of the program is a rejection of Feeneyite EENS.
Weston's Catholic philosophy says invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.He has changed the understanding of the dogma EENS to which is commonly non controversial.
They also overlooked Bishop Schneider refusing to say Protestants need to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. When Bishop Schneider in his recent statement on the Abu Dhabi meeting of Pope Francis refused to say that Protestants and other Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation Weston condoned it. Schnedier also refused to say all Muslims with no known exception are oriented to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church)AG 7, LG 14, CCC 846 etc).LifeSites condoned it. This is public heresy.

ROBERTO DEI MATTEI SUPPORTS CUSHINGITE NEW THEOLOGY

Diane Montagna asked Roberto dei Mattei about extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The  former professor affirmed EENS with the familiar necessary ambiguity. He quickly also  mentioned invincible ignorance. Then he added that we cannot be sure that any one can be saved in invincible ignorance.

But  why mention it?
If we can never be sure that a person is saved in invincible ignorance, why mention it with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus?

Mattei mentions it to be politically safe. He wants the liberals to know that he is one of them. He wants to tell the liberals and the Left that he is not a Feeneyite in the interpretation of EENS. He does not affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Invincible ignorance is an exception. There are objective cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance for him is his philosophical reasoning as a Catholic. It is of course  the  same for ecclesiastical Masonry and the Left.So all do not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.This was the implications of Diane Montagna's report for LifeSites News when she sought a clarification from Roberto dei Mattei.Again LifeSites compromised on the faith and supported heresy.It overlooked Cushingism. It condoned the New Theology.

LifeSites wants to protect its financial interests and so affirms heresy in public. Pope Francis too could be making statements to avoid persecution.No allowances are made for the pope.

CATECHISM AND VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE

The Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II support the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS. This was expressed on the website of Brother Andre Marie MICM, in his correspondence with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.1 There is no report on this subject at LifeSites.Since heresy is good for the pocket.It is expedient and convenient. They have been at it for so many years.

John Henry Weston is not going to affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are just hypotetical) instead of the present heretical Cushingism( hypothetical cases are objective exceptions to the dogma EENS in 1965-2019).He wants to create a rupture with the past since it is welcomed by the Left.This is heresy.If he does not mouth this heresy the ecclesiastics would call it triumphalism.

CDF WANTS HERESY IN PUBLIC

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) wants Catholic religious communities and lay movements to accept heresy and sacrilege.Otherwise canonical prohibitions will be placed upon them.2


LifeSites correspondents  avoids these canonical prohibitions.They simply use an irrational premise to interpret Magisterial documents.
So a non traditional and heretical conclusion is produced by the editor of LifeSites News which is accepted by the Left.

The following  was a report on the EucharistandMission blog and there was no comment from LifeSites.They did not want to get into some controversy.

Since possibilities of invincible ignorance are exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for Diane Montagna correspondent of LifeSitesNews, she has a different Profession of Faith, from me, if she is a Catholic.

For her the past popes contradict each other  and the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

Not for me.

The Nicene Creed would mean for her, 'I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and so they are exceptions to EENS'.

For her Vatican Council II would have to be a rupture with Tradition.But not for me.

Unitatis Redintigratio ( Decree on Ecumenism) 3, would contradict the old ecumenism of return for her.

There is no more the past exclusive ecclesiology for her but instead there are exceptions.Not for me as a Catholic.
But she would legally be a Catholic for the dissenting CDF. I would not be one.
These are mortal sins of faith. She does away with the Athanasius Creed. The Apostles Creed for her says, " I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church which says there is known salvation outside the Church, with invincible ignorance...".
So the Holy Mass which she attends would be a sacrilege. Since even after being informed she maintains the lie and error and does not end the scandal.-Lionel Andrades

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/contact

There was no denial or comment from Diane Montagna or John Henry Weston.This is all deception. It is unethical.Even by secular standards they would be telling a lie.Now they are to support a new magazine which allegedly will support the Catholic Faith.

Appropriately Weston's new weekly video is to be called a  'show'.-Lionel Andrades

1.

Letter Explaining Saint Benedict Center’s Doctrinal Stance

https://catholicism.org/letter-explaining-saint-benedict-centers-doctrinal-stance.html





2

1/9/19
Change in status of the Saint Benedict Center and the “Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary” and the Immaculate Heart of Mary School

https://www.catholicnh.org/about/stay-informed/media-releases/

Letter from Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to Bishop Libasci
https://www.catholicnh.org/assets/Documents/About/FAQ/Ltr-CDF-PAL.pdf


Letter from Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to Brother Andre Marie, Saint Benedict Center
https://www.catholicnh.org/assets/Documents/About/FAQ/Ltr-CDF-SBC.pdf


Precepts of Prohibition
https://www.catholicnh.org/assets/Documents/About/FAQ/Decree-Precepts-StBenedictCtr.pdf


_____________________________________

Muslims and Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church which is necessary for salvation

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/bpschneider-still-stays-with-non_9.html

FEBRUARY 20, 2019

Bishop Athanasius Schneider contradicts Pope John Paul II : supports a Christian theology of religious pluralism and salvation https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/bishop-athanasius-schneider-contradicts.htm

FEBRUARY 19, 2019

Bishop Schneider presented a pluralistic ecumenism without an exclusive ecclesiology in the Catholic Church : no denial from himhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/bishop-schneider-presented-pluralistic.html

Bishop Athansius Schneider did not say the Catholic Faith is the only religion of God and instead referred to the Christian religions : no correction or denial from him or LifeSitesNews  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/bishop-athansius-schneider-did-not-say.html

FEBRUARY 8, 2019

Pope Francis' document does not state that Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) says all Muslims are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/pope-francis-document-does-not-state.html

 FEBRUARY 28, 2019

No Magisterial document contradicts Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/no-magisterial-document-contradicts_28.html

 FEBRUARY 15, 2019CDF could ask Cardinal Muller and Bishop Schneider to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/cdf-could-ask-cardinal-muller-and.html 
FEBRUARY 13, 2019Cardinal Gerhard Muller cites the Catechism of the Catholic Church but does not say that it affirms the strict interpretation of salvationhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/cardinal-gerhard-muller-cites-catechism.html

FEBRUARY 8, 2019Protestants at LifeSitesNews need to convert : Vatican Council II-rational supports an ecumenism of return   

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE NEW ECUMENISM IN UNITATIS REDINTEGRATIO, VATICAN COUNCIL II : LIFESITESNEWS MAKES A MISTAKE  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/there-is-no-basis-for-new-ecumenism-in.html

 

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/contactù

FEBRUARY 8, 2019PADRE PIO SAID THAT MARTIN LUTHER IS IN HELL AND CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOW HIM WILL MEET THE SAME END- Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I, founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/padre-pio-said-that-martin-luther-is-in.html

MARCH 16, 2010LUTHERANS, PROTESTANTS ARE GOING TO HELL SAID ST.TERESA OF AVILA: CARMELITE MEETING YESTERDAY  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/repost-lutherans-protestants-are-going.html

FEBRUARY 7, 2019

Holy Mass for Diane Montagna is a sacrilege

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/holy-mass-for-diane-montagna-is.html

JANUARY 29, 2019Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office in 1949 was wrong.Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have made objective mistakes : all Magisterial documents with the blue passages affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church while the red passages, are only hypothetical and theoretical https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/frleonard-feeney-was-correct-and-holy.html

 JANUARY 26, 2019The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : CDF makes a mistakehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-catechism-of-catholic-church.html

 JANUARY 11, 2019The CDF wants Catholic religious communities and lay movements to accept heresy and sacrilege otherwise canonical prohibitions will be placed upon them  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-cdf-wants-catholic-religious.html

JANUARY 24, 2019Vatican Council II's Decree on Ecumenism ( Unitatis Redintigratio) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/vatican-council-iis-decree-on-ecumenism.html

JANUARY 23, 2019The rational approach, the only approach, is that CCC 846 affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and there are no practical exceptions mentioned in CCC 846 or the rest of the Catechismhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-rational-approach-only-approach-is.html

JANUARY 22, 2019 Catechism of the Catholic Church (n.846) affirms the strict and traditional interpretation of EENS defined by three Church Councils in the Extraordinary Magisterium https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/catechism-of-catholic-church-n846.html

 FEBRUARY 28, 2019

Catechism of the Catholic Church supports Fr. Leonard Feeney  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/catechism-of-catholic-church-supports.html  

JANUARY 26, 2019The red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-red-is-not-exception-to-blue-red.html

FEBRUARY 12, 2019

LifeSiteNews' report on Archbishop Schneider's statement is confusion   HTTPS://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2019/02/LIFESITENEWS-REPORT-ON-ARCHBISHOP.HTML

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 Catholic National Register, LifeSiteNews jump on the ecumenical pluralism wagon of the OWR https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/catholic-national-register-lifesitenews.html

DECEMBER 20, 2016So it is easy to talk about the exceptions in Amoris Laeititia for the scholars and the cardinals but it seems impossible for them to see the same error in salvation theology- since that will hit the purse https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/12/so-it-is-easy-to-talk-about-exceptions.html

March for Life : double standard of participants http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/march-for-life-double-standards-of.html 

JANUARY 31, 2015Rorate Caeili, Life Sites, NCR,EWTN prefer the evolved version of the dogma  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/01/rorate-caeili-life-sites-ncrewtn-prefer.html

_______________________________________________________________________________

Protest of Keehan Travesty at Gonzaga Graduation with McCarrick present : invitation to pro-abortion speaker

 

http://restore-dc-catholicism.blogspot.com/

Canadian blogger restricted

A Canadian blogger interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Vatican Council II with an irrationality to create heresy. He does not deny this with reason and theology. Nor does he comment upon it.So he meets Trudeau's political correct requirements.Then he keeps posting reports on Pope Francis being in heresy.

 

David Domet ( Vox Cantoris) had to pull down comments which support the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Possibly his employment and blog was being threatened in Trudeau's Canada.There non Catholics and things Satanic are granted special privileges.

So in 'the free and open' society of Canada he has announced that there is to be no discussion on EENS.

He depends upon a priest to guide him.But this priest  also interprets invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), as being visible exceptions to traditional EENS.

So he is forced to misinterpret Magisterial documents in general.The conclusion is an innovation.It is non traditional.

David is unable to discuss this issue.His only response to a comment 1 was'poppycock'.He objects when it is said that he is in heresy.But he could not deny the 10 points in a rational way.

It would then also be affirming traditional EENS without the irrationality. This would be opposed by the liberals and the Left in Canada, including the Conference of Canadian Bishops.The irrationality is obligatory.

We can interpret Vatican Council II by assuming hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc are  objective examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church. I call this approach Cushingite.This is Cushingism.

We can also interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical. So they would not be known non Catholics in 2019 saved outside the Church. I call this approach Feeneyite.

When we use the irrationality it is Cushingism and when we avoid it, it is Feeneyism for me.

 

Most Catholics today are Cushingites and so is David.They also include John Henry Weston, the Canadian editor of LifeSites News which has a Catholic web page.

If David interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism with Feeneyism the Left will object and threaten.For them Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church would be in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.

EENS today would be the same as it was for the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

The liberals could object legally.

 

They are not a push over like Fr. Thomas Rosica.Vox Cantoris knows this.

So in two of his blog posts, in which David has removed comments, he is politically correct but theologically and doctrinally he is not Catholic.His philosophy is bad.It is deception.

He can avoid all this but for practical reasons he does not. Meanwhile he criticizes Pope Francis, who also could be conforming with what the Masons and the Left want, to protect his life and to  safeguard the Vatican.

David cannot say that he affirms BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc, without them being exceptions to EENS, since then he would be back to the same problem -an intolerant society in Canada.

This is a reason why other traditionalists like Christopher Ferrara and Roberto de Mattei do not support Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II.

There are Catholic professors of philosophy , who agree with me and who could explain things to Domet, Verrecchio and Barnhardt but they afraid of losing their teaching jobs.

The professors who will participate in the summer conferences this year are all Cushingites like David and his priest-friend.They please the Left and go along with false doctrine.

Rorate Caeli to stay above water had also to remove comments on EENS with reference to the International Theological Commission a few years back.It was the same with the Catholic Herald, U.K.The Jewish Left objected in Britain.No such comments were allowed on the National Catholic Register too a few years back.

Here is one of the comments which David Domet could not respond to. He simply could have denied them, point by point.

-Lionel Andrades 

 

 1.

Comment (awaiting moderation) on the blog Vox Cantoris, You expect people to come to the Catholic Faith,why bother?

Vox,

Here are some points related the confusion and heresy in your two posts.

1.We must observe that the norm for salvation in the Catholic Church is faith and the baptism of water. The norm is not people-could-repent-at-the-last-moment and be saved.This was the error of Fr.Charles Curran who was checked by Pope John Paul II.

2.Since there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) nor of LG 8, GS 22, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II, there is no extraordinary way of salvation, known to us humans.

3.A non Christian, however admirable is his personality, who dies without faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14) is oriented to Hell.

When we meet non Catholics we know all of them are oriented to Hell with no known exception.Since the nome is the dogma EENS or AG 7 and LG 14 in Vatican Council II and literally we cannot know of any exception.

4.Outside the Church there is no salvation is a dogma of the Catholic Church which is not contradicted by anything mentioned in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).

5.Practically, there can be no known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Literally, we cannot  know anyone saved with BOD,BOB or I.l.The LOHO made a mistake in 1949 and it was repeated at Vatican Council II ( 1965).

6.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church in particular cases; no literal cases, we cannot say that someone in invincible ignorance is an exception to EENS.We cannot say only those who know about Jesus and the Church( who are not in ignorance) need to enter the Church and not all in general.This is the mistake in Lumen Gentium 14 based upon the objective mistake in LOHO( 1949). 

7.No one saw a St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.The Church only says she is a saint. This is all that is permitted for us humans who cannot see who is in Heaven.

8.No one saw St.Ambrose's friend, the Emperor Valentinian in Heaven, with or without the baptism of water.St. Ambrose could only speculate and hope and believe that his friend was there.

BOD, BOB and I.I for us humans can only be theoretical and speculative,I repeat.

9.A possibility of being saved outside the Church( since God is not limited) is not an actual, known person, saved outside the Church without faith and baptism.It's only a theoretical case.Also it is also possible, conversely, that there was no one saved outside the Church, over the last 50 years.

10.It is the Holy Spirit which guides the Church to say outside the Church there is no salvation.So we know how God will judge and what is the objective reality after death.Personal sentiments for people cannot change this objective reality.

So Catholics do not pray for non Catholics who have died.We can express our condolences and sympathy with non Catholic friends at the human level.We pray for non Catholics who are living. We can hope that God will show them the truth and that they may have what is needed to follow it.-Lionel Andrades 

 http://voxcantor.blogspot.com/2019/03/you-expect-people-to-come-to-catholic.html