Wednesday, November 11, 2020
I was discriminated against by Propaganda Fide, Vatican, the Legion of Christ university, Regina Apostolorum, Rome and the Beda Pontifical College(seminary), Rome, because of my Catholic beliefs.I was also not given the freedom of opinion, which the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican restricts to liberals in dissent
I was discriminated against by Propaganda Fide, Vatican, the Legion of Christ university, Regina Apostolorum, Rome and the Beda Pontifical College(seminary), Rome, because of my Catholic beliefs.I was also not given the freedom of opinion, which the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican restricts to liberals in dissent. -Lionel Andrades
Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI Vatican Foundation gives out theological awards to those who support liberalism in the Church.The liberalism is created with a deceptive premise and inference
Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI Vatican Foundation gives out theological awards to those who support liberalism in the Church.The liberalism is created with a deceptive premise and inference.-Lionel Andrades
http://www.fondazioneratzinger.va/content/fondazioneratzinger/en/premio.html
It's unethical for the Legion of Christ to offer the Post Graduate Diploma in Joseph Ratzinger : Studies and Spirituality,at the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA),Rome and not respond to corrections on this blog.The issue is not just theology. There is a philosophical and objective error in the writings of Pope Benedict. His philosophy and theology is based on the false premise. A New Theology is created and it is officially promoted
It's unethical for the Legion of Christ to offer the Post Graduate Diploma in Joseph Ratzinger : Studies and Spirituality,at the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA),Rome and not respond to corrections on this blog.The issue is not just theology. There is a philosophical and objective error in the writings of Pope Benedict. His philosophy and theology is based on the false premise. A New Theology is created and it is officially promoted.-Lionel Andrades
With the false premise Pope Francis and Pope Benedict have changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed and yet everyone at Holy Mass makes a Profession of Faith, in innocence with the Nicene Creed, as if it is normal and all is well
With the false premise Pope Francis and Pope Benedict have changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed and yet everyone at Holy Mass makes a Profession of Faith, in innocence with the Nicene Creed, as if it is normal and all is well. -Lionel Andrades
Popes, cardinals, bishops and priests must have the integrity to admit that they have used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents. So there really is no theological rupture with the past exclusivist salvation doctrines of the Catholic Church when the false premise is not used
Popes, cardinals, bishops and priests must have the integrity to admit that they have used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents. So there really is no theological rupture with the past exclusivist salvation doctrines of the Catholic Church when the false premise is not used.. -Lionel Andrades
Fratelli Tutti like Laudato Si and other encyclicals were written with Pope Francis intepreting Vatican Council II like Pope Benedict. He used a false premise and inference. So a false rupture was created with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church
Fratelli Tutti like Laudato Si and other encyclicals were written with Pope Francis intepreting Vatican Council II like Pope Benedict. He used a false premise and inference. So a false rupture was created with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades
All the books on Vatican Council II written by Pope Benedict which mention Vatican Council II are written with a false premise.He used a false premise to interpret the Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This has been reported so many times and there is no apology or acknowledgement of the error
All the books on Vatican Council II written by Pope Benedict which mention Vatican Council II, are written with a false premise.He used a false premise to interpret the Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
This has been reported so many times and there is no apology or acknowledgement of the error. -Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzingerhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html
DECEMBER 16, 2019
Pope Benedict's article on ecclesiology is flawed since like Cardinal Kasper he projected what is hypothetical as being non hypothetical, invisible as visible, implicit as explicit and subjective as objective to create a rupture with Tradition and the past ecclesiology. The error is being followed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) . They too interpret Lumen Gentium as contradicting Tradition; the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors etc. So the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete and the Nicene Creed changed. Image result for Ecclesiology of Pope Benedict cardinal ratzinger They probably knew their theology and ecclesiology is flawed but continue with the error for political reasons. It is unethical and deceptive and not Catholic.
SEPTEMBER 21, 2019
The Church can be considered as a communion and a Sacrament and this does not exclude it being the only path to salvation. The Church may be considered a Mystery but this does not exclude it having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation
SEPTEMBER 21, 2019 Pope Benedict refers to the Church as Communion, Sacrament, Mystery and this does not exclude the Church as being the only Ark of Noah ( CCC 845) with exclusive salvation.The Church still is the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood, it is the only Door to enter Heaven and it is the narrow gate. This is missing in Pope Benedict's ecclesiology of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/pope-benedict-refers-to-church-as.html
SEPTEMBER 20, 2019Cardinal Marc Ouellet has interpreted Vatican Council II as an 'ecclesiology of communion' without exclusive salvation in the Church https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinal-marc-ouellet-has-interpreted.html SEPTEMBER 20, 2019
SEPTEMBER 19, 2019The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the heretical New Theology and it wants the St.Benedict Center to do the same.Traditionalists at Una Voce(FIUV) and the Latin Mass Societies and organisations, are also forced to do likewise and there is no comment from them.Even the SSPX bishops and priests, use the New Theology to interpret the Council irrationally SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 We can now interpret Vatican Council Ii without the New Theology.Lumen Gentium, in its entire text, for example,would not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/we-can-now-interpret-vatican-council-ii.htmlSEPTEMBER 22, 2019Cardinal Walter Kasper interprets Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective . What is invisible is visible.What is implicit is confused as being explicit.He mixed up what is subjective as being objective.In this way a rupture with the old ecclesiology and the rest of Tradition, is created.His books on ecclesiology with this error are recommended reading at Ecclesiology semesters at the pontifical universities . They are approved by Pope Benedict and now Pope Francis. In an article on Ecclesiology, Cardinal Marc Oulett,uses Cardinal Kasper's books in the reference.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinal-walter-kasper-interprets.htmlSEPTEMBER 23, 2019 Fr.Jean Marie Gleize, Fr.Matthias Gaudron,Fr. Francois Laisney and other priests and professors of theology of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) teach the same mistake in ecclesiology made by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Cardinal Marc Ouelett,Cardinal Walter Kasper and Archbishop Rino Fisichella .Bishop Bernard Fellay is notorious https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/frjean-marie-gleize-frmatthias.html
SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/a-clarification-need-to-be-issued-by.html
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019 For Pope Benedict there is only a hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II since he chooses to interpret the Council with the false premise and inference to change the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/for-pope-benedict-there-is-only.html SEPTEMBER 22, 2019 Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html SEPTEMBER 22, 2019 THERE IS NO UNITY WITH THE APOSTLES SINCE CARDINAL RATZINGER REJECTS EXCLUSIVE SALVATION IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HTTPS://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2019/09/THERE-IS-NO-UNITY-WITH-APOSTLES-SINCE.HTML SEPTEMBER 24, 2019Pope Benedict made an error in ecclesiology and the New Catechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello have been following it at their seminaries https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/pope-benedict-made-error-in.html
A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/a-clarification-need-to-be-issued-by.htmlSEPTEMBER 25, 2019
The theology of religions banned by Pope John Paul II(CDF,Notification, Dupuis, 2001) is being taught by Fr. Bryan Lobo sj, at the Department of Missiology of the Pontifical University Gregorian. He also interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to intentionally create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-theology-of-religions-which-was.html
MAY 24, 2019
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/pope-benedict-and-cardinal-luiz-ladaria.html_____________________
The Legion of Christ's Post Graduate Diploma in Joseph Ratzinger : Studies and Spirituality at the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA) , Rome is based on the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artificial rupture wit Tradition.They consider this a virtue. The theological writings of Pope Benedict are based on an unethical use of a false premise , and even after being informed he does not apologize and admit that he made a mistake.The Legion of Christ faculty at the UPRA and their Curia in general, are acting as if nothing is wrong with this course offered in English, Italian and German
The Legion of Christ's Post Graduate Diploma in Joseph Ratzinger : Studies and Spirituality at the University Pontificial Regina Apostolorum (UPRA) , Rome is based on the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artificial rupture wit Tradition.They consider this a virtue.
The theological writings of Pope Benedict are based on an unethical use of a false premise , and even after being informed he does not apologize and admit that he made a mistake.The Legion of Christ faculty at the UPRA and their Curia in general, are acting as if nothing is wrong with this course offered in English, Italian and German.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.upra.org/offerta-formativa/facolta/teologia/ratzinger/
The Catholic Integrated Community(Katholische Integrierte Gemeinde ) interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a fake break with Tradition and they give Pope Benedict credit for this.They say this is his theology which they they follow
The Catholic Integrated Community(Katholische Integrierte Gemeinde ) interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a fake break with Tradition and they give Pope Benedict credit for this.
 |
NOVEMBER 10, 2020
The CDF has not issued a statement on Dr.Achim Busckenmaier being a member of the CDF and teaching at the John Lateran and Regina Apostolorum University in Rome
Die Katholische Integrierte Gemeinde und Papst Benedikt: Ein Interview
https://de.catholicnewsagency.com/story/die-katholische-integrierte-gemeinde-und-papst-benedikt-ein-interview-7170
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2018-05/theology-lateran-university-distance-learning.html
NOVEMBER 10, 2020
Integrierte Gemeinde is teaching theology at the John Lateran and Regina Apostolurum University, Rome with the false interpretation of Vatican Council II and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis are ovelooking it https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/integrierte-gemeinde-like-pope-benedict.html
NOVEMBER 10, 2020
Integrierte Gemeinde's new ecumenism and new inter-religious dialogue is Ratzingerian
NOVEMBER 9, 2020
Integrated Community (Integrierte Gemeinde) like Pope Benedict is teaching theology at the John Lateran and Regina Apostolurum University, Rome with the false interpretation of Vatican Council II
NOVEMBER 4, 2020
As Archbishop of Munich Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger supported liberalism with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Now he has disassociated himself from one such organisation without recanting the false interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
Report: Catholic group responsible for breaking up families and marriages is linked to Pope Benedict XVI
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/report-catholic-group-responsible-for-breaking-up-families-and-marriages-is-linked-to-pope-benedict-xvi
NOVEMBER 1, 2020
Pope Benedict needs to distance himself from the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS which he encouraged as archbishop of Munich which now has is own Synodal Path
I do not assume that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II are objective people in 1965-2020. So they are not exceptions to Tradition for me. I do not assume that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are objective people in 1949-2020. So they are not exceptions to Tradition for me. They do not theologically contradict EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed
I do not assume that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II are objective people in 1965-2020. So they are not exceptions to Tradition for me.
I do not assume that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are objective people in 1949-2020. So they are not exceptions to Tradition for me.
They do not theologically contradict EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. -Lionel Andrades
When there are no exceptions to Tradition in Vatican Council II and the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrines project the Council as a break with Tradition, something is wrong.This is not only an objective error it is a political error they are enforcing on Catholics
When there are no exceptions to Tradition in Vatican Council II and the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrines project the Council as a break with Tradition, something is wrong.This is not only an objective error it is a political error they are enforcing on Catholics.. -Lionel Andrades
If someone is not there and you assume that he or she is there and you begin reasoning , assuming that person is there, then you are using a false premise.Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. They assume unknown cases of LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc are known exceptions to 16th century EENS. They are known! So they become practical exceptions.Then they reject 16th century EENS. They assume invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS. This is human error and not the teaching of the Magisterium, Tradition and Scripture
If someone is not there and you assume that he or she is there and you begin reasoning , assuming that person is there, then you are using a false premise.Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. They assume unknown cases of LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc are known exceptions to 16th century EENS. They are known! So they become practical exceptions.Then they reject 16th century EENS.
They assume invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.
This is human error and not the teaching of the Magisterium, Tradition and Scripture. -Lionel Andrades
If there are four tall boys standing at a bus stop after school and a short one joins them there, he is an exception, since he is different but also because he is there. He is visible. He can be seen standing there. He is known. So it was wrong for the Holy Office 1949 to consider the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, when there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in our reality. Similarly it is a mistake for Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria when in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, they considered Lumen Gentium 16 etc as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This was a factual mistake.It is a fact of life that there are no BOD, BOB and I.I cases visible to us. If they existed they could only be known to God
If there are four tall boys standing at a bus stop after school and a short one joins them there, he is an exception, since he is different but also because he is there. He is visible. He can be seen standing there. He is known.
So it was wrong for the Holy Office 1949 to consider the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, when there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in our reality.
Similarly it is a mistake for Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria when in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, they considered Lumen Gentium 16 etc as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This was a factual mistake.It is a fact of life that there are no BOD, BOB and I.I cases visible to us. If they existed they could only be known to God. -Lionel Andrades
If there are 15 patients in a hospital ward and one of them is cured and is ready to leave, then he is an exception, not only because he is different but because he is there in that ward.He exists.He is visible. LG 8, LG 14, lG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to theoretical and hypotherical cases only.They are not real people born in 1965-2020.They are not visible. They do not exist.So it is wrong for Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,the cardinals and bishops, to project them as exceptions to EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition. This is an objective mistake
If there are 15 patients in a hospital ward and one of them is cured and is ready to leave, then he is an exception, not only because he is different but because he is there in that ward.He exists.He is visible. LG 8, LG 14, lG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to theoretical and hypotherical cases only.They are not real people born in 1965-2020.They are not visible. They do not exist.So it is wrong for Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,the cardinals and bishops, to project them as exceptions to EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition. This is an objective mistake. -Lionel Andrades
In a box of oranges an apple is an exception, since it is different.But also because it exists there in that box. If it was not there it would not be an exception. There are no baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) cases in our reality. Yet BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).This is an objective error. It cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake. This is human error
In a box of oranges an apple is an exception, since it is different.But also because it exists there in that box. If it was not there it would not be an exception.
There are no baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) cases in our reality.
Yet BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).This is an objective error. It cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake. This is human error. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
