Saturday, September 18, 2021
Lega candidates for Rome's Mayoral elections must demand an end to the Leftist domination of theology in the Catholic Church : Melloni must not be free to use the fake premise and the SSPX must not be coerced to be un-ethical
When the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise then religious liberty will not be an issue since the Council will be ecclesiocentric( AG 7) .LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc would not be practical exceptions for AG 7 and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So when there is a Catholic State it will be supported by an ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the past ecclesiology.There will be no change with the ecclesiology of the Papal States of Italy.Since the Council will not have changed theology, when it is interpreted rationally.
Similarly when the Council is ecclesiocentric , collegiality will not be a problem, since at the level of the popes, bishops conferences and synods, they all would have to affirm an ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II.They would have to be in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.
With an ecclesiocentric Council there can only be an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church. The Council would no more be saying like at present, that outside the Church there is 'known salvation'; there are 'known cases of Christians' from other denominations saved without the Catholic faith, and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. There are no such cases.This is common sense.
There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire said Bishop Athansius Schneider when he was interviewed recently by Dr. Taylor Marshall.The latter said that there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.This takes the Church in a new direction.
Likewise Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialoogue will be based, no more on the false premise,of the liberals,but on the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This would be supported by the ‘new’ Vatican Council II.The liberals will no more be able to cite the Council.The Old Ecumenism would be the interpretation of the Council.
The Council is the same before us.Liberals and conservatives see the same text.But now the Council would have to be interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being physically invisible and not visible in 2021.
So we would look at the Council with the red passages ( which mention the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in Ad Gentes 7) as not being practical exceptions to the blue passages ( which support orthodoxy and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church in Ad Gentes 7).
Similarly in Lumen Gentium 14 the passages which mention the BOD and I.I( and which I refer to as the red passages or Cushingite passages) would not be read as exceptions to the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II, supporting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church( and which I refer to as the blue passages or Feeneyite passages).The red is not an exception to the blue.
Another way of looking at Vatican Council II is with the blue left hand side rational column and not the red right hand side irrational column.
For the popes from Paul VI to Francis the red was an exception to the blue and they used the red right hand side irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents.They irrationally interpreted LG 8, LG 14m LG 16 and also the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.
So with this understanding of Vatican Council II it is important that the Lega political candidates for Rome’s Mayoral elections next month,and also the political party of Salvini at the national level in the north of Italy, demand an end to the leftist domination of theology in the Catholic Church.1) The red is not an exception to the blue and 2) we can interpret the Council with the left hand side rational blue column.In this way they create a hermeneutic of continuity with the Tradition and the Church and the historical Church of St. Francis of Assisi.
CALL TO ACTION
1.An injustice is being done to the Society of St. Pius X( Fraternita Societa San Pio X), at Albano, Lazio, outside the city of Rome.They are told to interpret Vatican Council II with 1) the red being an exception to the blue and 2) the right hand side red irrational column.
2.The churches in Rome have been confiscated by the leftist governments and the government-appointed committees, oversee their management .The police, mostly non Christians, are present at every Holy Mass to monitor what the priest teaches.
The priests should be free to interpret Vatican Council II without 1) the red being an exception to the blue and 2) with the blue left hand side rational column, in harmony with Tradition.
3.Pope Benedict must acknowledge that all his books on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc were written with a fake premise supporting the Left. The conclusion was non traditional and false.This error should not be imposed upon the students at the pontifical universities in Rome. This is unethical.
4.Also Pope Francis must acknowledge that all his encyclicals and the recent Traditionis Custode were written Vatican Council II interpreted with the same fake premise.Priests are forced to do the same to be allowed to offer Holy Mass in Rome.
5.The Lega candidates could ask Rome to come back to the Faith. Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise to create a break with Tradition( ecumenism etc). The Italian government gives him over a million euros annually.The Rome Vicariate and the Vatican approve this.
6.The Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation can be sought and affirmed by all Catholics in Rome. Since, outside the Church there is no salvation ( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II). Vatican Council II supports the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, when it is interpreted with a rational premise. So LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions to EENS and the Athanasius Creed.
Lega candidates for Rome's Mayoral elections must demand an end to the Leftist domination of theology in the Catholic Church : Melloni must not be free to use the fake premise and the SSPX must not be coerced to be un-ethical
When the SSPX interprets Vatican Council
II without the false premise then religious liberty will not be an issue since
the Council will be ecclesiocentric( AG 7) .LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, GS 22
etc would not be practical exceptions
for AG 7 and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Then when there is a Catholic
State it will be supported by an ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II in harmony
with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the past ecclesiology.There
will be no change with the ecclesiology of the Papal States of Italy.Since the
Council will not have changed theology, when it is interpreted rationally.
Similarly when the Council is
ecclesiocentric , collegiality will not be a problem, since at the level of the
popes, bishops conferences and Synods they would have to affirm an
ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II.They would have to be in harmony with the
strict interpretation of EENS.
With an ecclesiocentric Council there
can only be an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church. The Council would no
more be saying like at present, that outside the Church there is known
salvation; there are known cases of Christians from other denominations saved
without the Catholic faith, and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
There are no such cases.This is common sense.
There are no literal cases of the
baptism of desire said Bishop Athansius Schneider when he was interviewed
recently by Dr. Taylor Marshall.Marshall said that there are no explicit cases
of Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.This takes the Church in a new
direction.
Likewise Ecumenism and Inter-Religious
Dialoogue will be based, no more on the false premise,of the liberals,but on
the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This would be supported by
the ‘new’ Vatican Council II.The liberals will no more be able to cite the
Council.The Old Ecumenism would be the interpretation of the Council.
The Council is the same before
us.Liberals and conservatives see the same text.But now the Council would have
to be interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being
physically invisible and not visible in 2021.
So we would look at the Council with the
red passages ( which mention the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in
Ad Gentes 7) as not being practical exceptions
to the blue passages ( which support orthtodoxy and exclusive salvation
in the Catholic Church in Ad Gentes 7).
Similarly in Lumen Gentium 14 the
passages which mention the BOD and I.I( and which I refer to as the red
passages or Cushingite passages) would not be read as exceptions to the
orthodox passages in Vatican Council II, supporting exclusive salvation in the
Catholic Church( and which I refer to as the blue passages or Feeneyite passages)The
red is not an exception to the blue.
Another way of looking at Vatican
Council II is with the blue left hand side rational column and not the red
right hand side irrational column.
For the popes from Paul VI to Francis
the red was an exception to the blue and they used the red right hand side
irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial
documents.They irrationally interpreted LG 8, LG 14m LG 16 and also the baptism
of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.
So with this understanding of Vatican
Council II it is important that the Lega political candidates for Rome’s
Mayoral elections next month,and also the political party of Salvini at the
national level in the north of Italy, demand an end to the leftist domination
of theology in the Catholic Church.1) The red is not an exception to the blue
and 2) we can interpret the Council with
the left hand side rational blue column.In this way they create a hermeneutic
of continuity with the Tradition and the Church and the historical Church of
St. Francis of Assisi.
CALL TO ACTION
1.An iinustice is being done to the
Society of St. Pius X( Fraternita Societa San Pio X), at Albano, Lazio, outside
the city of Rome.They are told to interpret Vatican Council II with 1) the red
being an exception to the blue and 2) the right hand side red irrational
column.
2.The churches in Rome have been
confiscated by the leftist governments and the present
government-appointed committee oversees
this management .The police, mostly non Christians, are present at every Holy
Mass to monitor what the priest teaches.
The priests should be free to interpret
Vatican Council II without 1) the red being an exception to the blue and 2)
with the blue left hand side rational column, in harmony with Tradition.
3.Pope Benedict must acknowledge that all his books on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc were written with a fake premise supporting the Left. The conclusion was non traditional and false.This error should not be imposed upon the students at the pontifical universities in Rome. This is unethical.
4.Also Pope Francis must acknowledge
that all his encyclicals and the recent Traditionis Custode were written Vatican
Council II interpreted with the same fake premise.Priests are forced to do the
same to be allowed to offer Holy Mass in Rome.
5.The Lega candidates could ask Rome to
come back to the Faith. Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School interprets
Vatican Council II with a fake premise to create a break with Tradition(
ecumenism etc). The Italian government gives him over a million euros
annually.The Rome Vicariate and the Vatican approve this.
6.The Social Reign of Christ the King in
all political legislation can be sought and affirmed by all Catholics in Rome.
Since, outside the Church there is no salvation ( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council
II). Vatican Council II supports the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic
Church, when it is interpreted with a rational premise. So LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions to EENS and the Athanasius
Creed.
7.The liberalism in the Church comes from the use of the false premise.Without the false premise Vatican Council II cannot be cited by the Satanic political parties( Partito Democratico, Movimento Cinque Stelle etc) in Rome.The Council must no more be cited to support Satanic values like homosexual unions, abortion on demand, contraception at vending machines, public immodesty in clothes, pornography and violence in the official media, ecclesiastical rejection of the faith etc.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
