Monday, January 13, 2020

Professors at the St.John Lateran University, Rome know that Vatican Council II does not contradict the old Jesuit interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but they do not teach it to the students. So they keep their teaching jobs at the pontifical university.

Papa Francesco Lateranense 14
The professors at the St.John Lateran University, Rome know that Vatican Council II does not contradict the old Jesuit interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but they do not teach it to the students. So they keep their teaching jobs at the pontifical university.
So the professors teach students that physically invisible cases referenced in Lumen Gentium 8 etc are physically visible exceptions to 16th century EENS.
 _CG39643_CG39671
The professors accept this irrationality and teach it concluding that there is a new theology, a new ecumenism, a new evangelisation, new canon law and new ecclesiology,, which is a rupture with Sacred Tradition( EENS ecumenism etc).
 _CG26098_CG26145
What the professors teach on theology is not magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.Instead it is political, deceptive and unethical and allows the professors to keep their precious teaching jobs approved by the Left which represents Satan.
It also allows them not to affirm the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church and a strict interpretation of EENS.-Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 11, 2020


The professors Tangorra, Fuss,Chenaux, Nardin,Ciola, Zak and Ferri tell students at the St. John Lateran University Rome to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and Pope Francis and Pope Benedict approve it. Otherwise the Council would support the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and this would not be approved by the Left, which represents Satan

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-professors-tangorra-fusschenaux.html



JANUARY 10, 2020

Image result for Photo of St.John Lateran university

Professors Tangorra, Fuss,Chenaux, Nardin,Ciola, Zak, Ferri and others do not tell students at the St. John Lateran University, Rome that Vatican Council II does not mention any exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/professors-tangorra-fusschenaux.html

 

DECEMBER 31, 2019


Michelt, Stancati, Weimann, Ellul, Rossi, Destivelle, Keramidas, Buckles, Bonino, Sullivan, Blankenhorn, Giordano and other professors at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas Rome, the whole group, are interpreting Lumen Gentium 8 etc as being exceptions to 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)- when they are not.



https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/michelt-stancati-weimann-ellul-rossi.html


JANUARY 4, 2020



The Handook of Studies of the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome ( Ordo) shows like the Handook of Studies of the Angelicum University Rome ( 2019-2020) that Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally to create a rupture with traditional mission doctrine, the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, an ecumenism of return and extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the miissionaries in the 16th century

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-handook-of-studies-of-urbaniana.html



DECEMBER 18, 2019

 Image 

La Sapienza University Rome has a Faculty of Law(Jurisprudenza) which interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/la-sapienza-university-rome-has-faculty.html



JANUARY 9, 2020

 Image result for Photo Mary Ellen Mahon ManchesterImage result for Photo Mary Ellen Mahon Manchester

Mary Ellen Mahon, Director of Education in the Diocese of Manchester, USA and Brother Andre Marie MICM,Prior at St. Benedict Center are contradicted by the professors at the St. John Lateran University Rome 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/mary-ellen-mahon-director-of-education.html


For Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Mary Ellen Mahon,Director of Education and a member of the Curia in Manchester, there are no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I : Wikipedia expects Fr. Leonard Feeney to say there were literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

For Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Mary Ellen Mahon,Director of Education and a member of the Curia in Manchester, there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) in New England this year.Yet Wikipedia entries/links  expect Fr.Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and Feeneyism to affimr that there are physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I which are exceptions to the centuries-old interpretation of EENS. 
So for Wikipedia there is EENS with exceptions of the BOD, BOB and I.I for the St. Benedict Center there is EENS with no exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I.
So Fr. Leonard Feeney is criticized for not saying that there were literal cases of, for example, the baptism of desire, which were known to him in Boston.-Lionel Andrades  




JANUARY 7, 2020

The Wikipedia entries on the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney is leftist propaganda.It pre-supposes that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to visible and known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It also pre-supposes that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ known salvation outside the Church where the true Church subsists), Lumen Gentium 16 etc, are known non Cathlics saved outside the Church.Upon this error they have created a rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation




JANUARY 6, 2020

The Wikipedia reports on Fr. Leonard Feeney and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the EWTN report 'Tragic Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney' are false. They pre-suppose that Lumen Gentium 16 etc are exceptions to the 16th century, strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).



Pope Paul VI was fallible on faith.He also made a mistake on an infallible teaching of the Church, with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He avoided the rational alternative. All the popes upto Francis have repeated the same mistake.


Image result for photo Paul VI

Pope Paul VI was fallible on faith.He also made a mistake on an infallible teaching of the Church, with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He avoided the rational alternative. All the popes upto Francis have repeated the same mistake.
Pope Paul VI, like Cardinal Karol Wojtyla and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvere, interpreted Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being non hypothetical.They were objective in real life with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He confused what was invisible as being visible. Possibily it was also an innocent error of the popes who followed.
So after Vatican Council II(1965) he interpreted invisible cases of LG 8( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions), LG 14( case of the unknown catechumen) and LG 16( being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church) etc as being visible.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc referred to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church for the pope. So they were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.If they were not personally known and visible they could not be exceptions to EENS.So the strict interpretation of EENS was made obsolete with this irrationality.
1.EENS which was defined by three Church Council II in the Extraordinary Magisterium was rejected, by confusing what was invisible as being visible.
2.The dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra was also rejected.Fr. Hans Kung sj commented upon this.EENS was an infallible teaching and it was rejected with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
So the a) dogma EENS and 2) the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra  was rejected with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Paul VI.
3.But Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and and there is  no rejection of Tradition.The Council supports EENS.But now we have the rejection of Vatican Council II in the ordinary Magisterium, with the false premise and inference.

So the Ordinary and Extraordinary Magisterium was put aside   by Pope Paul VI.He rejected the dogma EENS, the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra ( in defining EENS) and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in the ordinary Magisteriium.
The result : the understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms have been changed.
The error was repeated by popes John Paul II, Benedict and Francis.
So were they infallible on faith ? No.They made a mistake on a faith issue.
Image result for photo john lateran university rome
Today the professors  at the John Lateran University, Rome and other pontificial uniìversities, will not tell students that there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict the strict interpretation of EENS.
There is nothing in the Council-text to cotradict the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and the old ecumenism of return, unless you confuse what is invisible as being visible, as did the popes from Paul VI.
Image result for photo  Fr. Leonard Feeney
The problem was also there during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII who did not defend Fr. Leonard Feeney when it was being said that unknown cases of baptism of desire (BOD) baptism of blood (BBOB) and invincible  ignorance (I.I) were known exceptions to EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.
Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing, Archbishop of Boston, did not correct the Jesuits at Boston College, who made an objective mistake(invisible people are visible) on BOD, BOB and I.I.
For the popes and saints over the centuries BOD, BOB and I.I were always hypothetical only.
They could only be hypothetical. 
For Pope Pius XII and Paul VI , BOD, BOB and I.I were objective. This was the small mistake which changed the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Pope Benedict called for doctrinal talks with the SSPX without addressing this issue.-Lionel Andrades


Preghiera di guarigione - Medjugorje11 gennaio 2020

Il miracolo che abbiamo ricevuto a Medjugorje: Davide!!