The presentation by Catholic scholars on Christianity and Islamism at the Pontifical Institute of Islamic Studies (PISAI) are not authentic. Since there are two versions of Vatican Council II to choose from and they depend upon the dishonest one.

 

The presentation by Catholics scholar on Christianity and Islamism at the Pontifical Institute of Islamic Studies (PISAI) is not authentic. Since there are two versions of Vatican Council II to choose from and PISAI depends upon the dishonest one.

 The conclusion, of the itnerpretation,  is based upon how the scholar interprets Vatican Council II. There is liberalism or tradition. The scholars at PISAI interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and so there is liberalism. But they are obligated to interpret the Council rationally and so present the traditional understanding of other religions not being paths to salvation from Hell. By choosing to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally they present a rosy picture of other religions and life after death in Heaven for all. 

One such scholar is Diego Cuccarella, the President, at the PISAI. 1

 - Lionel Andrades

1

https://en.pisai.it/the-pisai/news/2023/august/international-workshop-on-arabic-biblical-interpretation/

SARRIÓ CUCARELLA DIEGO

Academic rank: President, Senior Lecturer

Phone: 06 58392611

email: preside@pisai.it

Email: diego.sarrio@pisai.it

Country: Spain

Courses: Islamic Studies, Arabic language

The discovery

 

The discovery

We have a discovery today. It’s ‘a small point’ but this small point turns the Council around. From liberalism the Council returns to Tradition. So by ignoring this small point, we have liberalism in the Church. This small point, is the premise: the rational and irrational premise. It decides if Vatican Council II has a continuity or break with Tradition. This is the discovery. We now have a switch. We can turn it off or on. We can choose a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors or a rupture with Tradition.   -Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

former Staff Reporter, daily Morning News, Karachi, Pakistan.

Recipient of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award, presented by the Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto.

Recipient of the Pakistan Government's Award for Literature ( Childrens stories).

Teacher of English and Church History at the Catholic Minor Seminary, Rawalpindi.                                                                                                 

 

                                                            Bishop Anthony Lobo

Sent to Rome for Ministerial Priesthood by Bishop Anthony Lobo, bishop of Rawalpindi-Islamabad, Pakistan.

Discriminated against by the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome.He interprets Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. So there is a continuity with Tradition. He is not allowed to study at pontifical universities in  Rome,  where it is obligatory to interpret Magisterial Documents, irrationally and unethically.Catholic students and seminarians are discriminated against. This is public and official.

However we have a new discovery in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral, when it is interpreted rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. So they are not objective examples of salvation. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.The Creeds must not be changed.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version of the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils, which is heretical, non-traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and call it Catholic.

Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Kung, Lefebvre and Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. We can today choose to interpret the Council rationally and in harmony with Tradition.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Appeal for Prayer for the Armenian People

 

Appeal for Prayer for the Armenian People

https://www.cardinalburke.com/presentations/armenian-people-prayer-appeal