There is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Italy.

 

There is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Italy. The priest who offered the 11 am Mass in Latin at the SSPX St. Catherine of Siena chapel in Rome, interpreted Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and inference. So his conclusion was nontraditional. I informed the SSPX centers in Albano, Rimini etc.I e-mailed them. There is no comment.

This has been the situation for the last 10 years or more. No one comments. They are afraid to say something wrong. They have made a major mistake.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He did not choose the Rational Premise. This was the same mistake as the liberal popes from Paul VI to Francis.They have interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, irrationally.Archbishop Lefebvre also accepted the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. The mistake was not corrected by Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed him. -Lionel Andrades

Sergio Mattarella, Georgia Melloni, Matteo Salvini, Roberto Fiore, Frabrizio Lastei… are following the leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II, the globalist version.

 

Sergio Mattarella, Georgia Melloni, Matteo Salvini, Roberto Fiore, Frabrizio Lastei… are following the leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II, the globalist version.- Lionel Andrades

If Pope Francis rejects the mistake in the 1949 LOHO and re-interprets Vatican Council II rationally he becomes a traditionalist

 

If Pope Francis admits that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) made a mistake and that he now interprets Vatican Council II with the rational premise and inference then he becomes a traditionalist. Since the Council, without the LOHO reasoning, is no more liberal for him.

This is still not understood by the traditionalists who must reject the error in the LOHO, re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the College of Cardinals, to do the same. Then the next popes will have to be conservative since the Council is conservative.

There cannot be a New Ecumenism since there is no known salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2023.

There is no New Ecclesiology since outside the Church there is no known salvation in 1965-2023.

There cannot be a New Evangelization since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has not been contradicted by Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc).

There cannot be a political interpretation of Vatican Council II for the bishops since the Council is Feeneyite. Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 support Feeneyite EENS, while LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2 and GS 22 are not objective exceptions for AG 7 and EENS.

The Council is no more leftist for the people, that is, those among them who discern.

There can be a Vatican Council II which is rational or irrational, in harmony or a break with Tradition, supporting 16^th century EENS or rejecting it, against the Syllabus of Errors or for it, changing the Athanasius Creed  or supporting them as they were understood over the centuries.-Lionel Andrades

Good Morning - Let's Discover life in Medjugorje in the Morning | January 25,2023

Canonically he does not qualify to be a pope. Since even a Rector and Parish Priest, according to Canon Law, has to be a Catholic in public. He must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church in public

 

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. He changes the meaning of the Nicene and Athanasius Creeds. He rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, interpreted rationally. Instead he interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance irrationally. They are physically visible and not invisible for him. They are objective exceptions for EENS and not just hypothetical and subjective references. If they were invisible for him he would be affirming Tradition. He would be a traditionalist.

A pope who cannot affirm the Creeds in public? He cannot affirm the dogma EENS in public? He cannot affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX in public?

So how is Pope Francis allowed to offer Holy Mass? Cardinals and bishops too in this condition are automatically excommunicated. Canonically he does not qualify to be a pope. Since even a Rector and Parish Priest, according to Canon Law, has to be a Catholic in public. He must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church in public.-Lionel Andrades

Rosary Live From Apparition Hill Medjugorje

Rorate Caeili, the SSPX bishops and those who attend the Latin Mass are making the same mistake, so how can they correct Pope Francis ?

Rorate Caeili ( web blog) still interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.1

 The title should read :

The Council ( interpreted irrationally by the Lefebvrists and liberals) and the Eclipse of God by Don Pietro Leone: CHAPTER 11 (part 1) : The Effects of Council ( irrational)  Teaching. 

Rorate Caeili (web blog) still interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.1

 The title should read:

The Council (interpreted irrationally by the Lefebvrists and liberals) and the Eclipse of God by Don Pietro Leone: CHAPTER 11 (part 1): The Effects of Council (irrational) Teaching.

The Lefebvrists interpret Vatican Council II like the Jewish Left (ADL) and Pope Francis.So Rorate Caeili is not expected to say, that Pope Francis, is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally, changing the meaning of the Nicene and Athanasius Creeds and rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, interpreted rationally. So how is Pope Francis allowed to offer Holy Mass? Cardinals and bishops too in this condition are automatically excommunicated. Canonically he does not qualify to be a pope. Since even a Rector and Parish Priest according to Canon Law, has to be a Catholic and in public follow the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Pope Francis is not affirming the dogma EENS in public even though Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.

He is not affirming the Athanasius Creed even though the Council interpreted rationally supports the past ecclesiocentrism.

He is not affirming the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX in public even the though the Council intepreted with the Rational Premise, does not contradict the Syllabus.

Rorate Caeili, the SSPX bishops and those who attend the Latin Mass are making the same mistake, so how can they correct Pope Francis ?

-Lionel Andrades

1

The Council and the Eclipse of God by Don Pietro Leone: CHAPTER 11 (part 1) : The Effects of Council Teaching

 https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/01/the-council-and-eclipse-of-god-by-don.html#more

TESTIMONIANZA MEDJUGORJE. Stijepo Gleđ Markos

Where is the Parish Office of Medjugorje | January 25, 2023