Sunday, February 25, 2018

Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists are interpreting Vatican Council II schismatically.

Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists are interpreting Vatican Council II schismatically.Chris Ferrara and Bishop Donald Sanborn use the false premise to make the Council a rupture with the past Magisterium.

The difference between Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j,  and Chris Ferrara is that the latter affirms the strit interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), while the cardinal does not .But both interpret Vatican Council II schismatically. Cardinal Luiz Ladaria accepts the conclusion of the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the premise and Christopher Ferrara rejects it.
Since for me LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc do not refer to known people saved outside the Church( they are known only to God) so Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS for me. I am not in schism with the Magisterium of the 16th century.
So when I say that Cardinal Luiz Ladaria or the traditionalists and sedevacantists are in schism I do not mean that there are malafide intentions but they are unknowingly using the premise which creates a rupture with the past popes on de fide teachings on salvation.
-Lionel Andrades


 FEBRUARY 25, 2018

Conservative Catholics too are supporting heresy( new version of Vatican Council II,EENS, Catechisms etc) and schism( a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century with Vatican Council II).
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/conservative-catholics-too-are.html



FEBRUARY 24, 2018

SSPX begin negotiations with Abp. Guido Pozzo : ask if Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the Lionel Andrades model.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-begin-negotiations-with-abp-guido.html


FEBRUARY 24, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j is in schism error needs to be recanted : Catholics have to affirm heresy and schism of the present Magisterium in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise to elicit a non traditional and heretical conclusion which is a break with the past Magisterium of the Church. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-is-in-schism.html



FEBRUARY 24, 2018

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF),Vatican has no objections if all Catholic religious communities affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise : information exclusively on Lionel's Blog
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html


FEBRUARY 23, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j in schism : enforcing it on the whole Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-in-schism.html



FEBRUARY 23, 2018

This is how Michael Voris, Louie Verrechio, the FSSP and SSPX must re-read the text of Vatican Council II.It means there is no known salvation outside the Church, Protestants are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church, inter faith marriages are adultery and Protestants receiving the Eucharist are in a sacrilege
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/this-is-how-michael-voris-louie.html




FEBRUARY 23, 2018

Tell Card.Marx that you affirm Vatican Council II according to Lionel Andrades.There is no known salvation outside the Church. So Protestants cannot receieve the Eucharist (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/tell-cardmarx-that-you-affirm-vatican.html



FEBRUARY 22, 2018

So at least the traditionalists should tell the two popes that they follow Lionel Andrades' interpretation on Vatican Council II and EENS.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/so-at-least-traditionalists-should-tell.html


________________________________________







Conservative Catholics too are supporting heresy( new version of Vatican Council II,EENS, Catechisms etc) and schism( a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century with Vatican Council II).

It was commonly known that the present Magisterium was in schism with the past Magisterium but every one would would it brush it off and say Vatican Council II was responsible for this.They were really referring to Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise and this was not known to Catholics.
Now we know. We've stumbled on to the missing link.If this was a ruse we have found it out. If it was a simple mistake we can now correct it.The truth is out finally.
It was only by interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational premise that the liberals and Masons could create a schism with the past Magisterium of the Church.
Now we simply avoid the false premise(invisible people are physically visible in the present times) and the interpretation of Vatican Council II is no more schismatic.
Catholics no more have to support heresy.
Image result for photo Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
Image result for photo Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
CMRI, MHFM and other Catholics who went into sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)- being interpreted by them with the false premise - can now re-interpret the Council.
The SSPX can re-interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors while conservative and liberal Catholic heretics, will no more  be able to cite any reference in the text of the Council to support themselves.They depended on the false premise.
Image result for photo Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
The old concept of liberals and traditionalists has now taken a jolt and could crumble or change.Since even Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei interpret Vatican Council II schismatically.They use the false premise and then reject the conclusion and blame it all on Vatican Council II.I don't interpret the Council like them.So I support Vatican Council II( premise-free).
Image result for photo Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
But Remnant News, Catholic Herald and other Catholic media use the invisible people are visible premise.So do the apologists at Catholic Answers, EWTN and the National Catholic Register. It's the same with cardinals Kasper,Koch and Marx.
Image result for photo  Roberto dei Mattei
Image result for photo  Roberto dei Mattei

Conservative Catholics too are supporting heresy( new version of Vatican Council II,EENS, Catechisms etc) and schism( a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century with Vatican Council II).
Image result for photo  Roberto dei Mattei
Related image
Image result for photo  Roberto dei Mattei
Image result for photo  Roberto dei Mattei
Note: It is important when reading Vatican Council II not to assume the text as for and against EENS. Since this is a sign that the false premise is being used unknowingly.-Lionel Andrades


FEBRUARY 24, 2018



 



SSPX begin negotiations with Abp. Guido Pozzo : ask if Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the Lionel Andrades model.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-begin-negotiations-with-abp-guido.html







FEBRUARY 24, 2018










Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j is in schism error needs to be recanted : Catholics have to affirm heresy and schism of the present Magisterium in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise to elicit a non traditional and heretical conclusion which is a break with the past Magisterium of the Church.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-is-in-schism.html



FEBRUARY 24, 2018













Related image

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF),Vatican has no objections if all Catholic religious communities affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise : information exclusively on Lionel's Blog

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html














Image result for photo Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei