Today
is the feast of the Dedication of the Basilica of St. Mary Majors in Rome when
the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Priests, bishops, cardinals and popes today
also must be Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
A
Cushingite Church is a heretical Church. It is a break with the 5th
century Catholic Church after the Council of Ephesus.
For me
the Catholic Church has not moved from the 5th century, since I am a
Feeneyite. For Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops it has moved since
their new theology is Cushingite.
When they refer to Vatican Council II they mean Vatican Council II Cushingite. For me Vatican Council II is always Feeneyite. So today is not enough to vaguely refer to Vatican Council II. It has to be qualified if it is Vatican Council II , Feeneyite or Cushingite, rational or irrational, a continuation with tradition and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) or a rupture with EENS.
For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible cases. So I am a Feeneyite.
For the cardinals who will be appointed next month, LG (, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2023. So they are Cushingites. In other words , there are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, for them.They are examples of salvation outside the Church.So they have made EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q-outside the Church there is no salvation), obsolete.Outside the Church there is known salvation, in personal cases for them.It has to be known salvation.But invisible people cannot be practical exceptions for EENS.Invisible people who are not there cannot make the Syllabus of Errors obsolete.
So the 21 cardinals imply that what is invisible for me is visible for them.So outside the Church there is known salvation for them.This was the new theology, the new theology of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, which they accept.
Cushingites say what is invisible is visible.
Feeneyites say what is invisible is invisible.
In the 15th century they interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. So there were no practical exceptions for traditional EENS, of the Church Fathers and the Apostles.-Lionel Andrades
_________________
JULY 28, 2023
Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II
TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.
If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.
I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.
The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc irrationally and I am rational.
I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.
The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.
Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com
p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Posts
