So when he realized that the 'magisterium' had really made a mistake everything fell into place : the interpretations became rational and Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the past ecclesiology and EENS

A few years later one of the first priests who would agree with me was Fr. Maximillian dei Gasparri F.I. He was the Italian Rector of the Franciscans of the Immaculate church in Lungotevere, Rome, near the Vatican.

He was a young priest who was trying to resolve his personal confusion on the salvation issue.He chose special subjects at the Pontifical Holy Crross university, of the Opus Dei in Rome  to make things clear for himself. When I spoke with a him a few times on this subject he finally had an insight and was moved.     It all became clear to him. It was an experience for me too.Defacto there is no real baptism of desire he knew. De jure, in principle, one could accept a baptism of desire. If one says that de facto there is a baptism of desire this is heresy. Since the dogma EENS is rejected.This is confusion. 

So another human being, had agreed with me.This was some consolation. Otherwise , I was on my own, alone, arguing against everyone. My only friends were Jesus, Our Lady and my Guardian Angel. 1

Before this insight Fr. Maximillian dei Gaspari would assume that the Magisterium is always correct( and I agree with him, he is correct). Most of us Catholics begin with this premise.

The Magisterium is always correct.Yes it is !

But when a pope or a Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith makes an error it is a human mistake. It is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit. It is not magisterial.

So there are sometimes when a pope or a CDF -Prefect can make a mistake or be influenced by a particular lobby to change the teachings of the Catholic Church.

In Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus,Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect of the CDF, reminds us to follow the Magisterium implying that RM and DI was magisterial and without error.

But he would have known that a false premise and inference was made in the Boston Case and it was repeated at Vatican Council II. Perhaps his appointment as Prefect of the CDF was made to preserve or hide this error in the Church and let it pass off as a magisterial teaching.

As the Prefect of the CDF he maintained the false narrative in the Catholic Church when he had a chance to correct it with Redemptoris Missio.  

Redemptoris Missio has a theology which is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.The result is heresy. It is a rejection of the traditional, rational interpreation of the baptism of desire etc.So there is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). The Creeds and Catechisms have their meaning changed and the Athanasius Creed is rejected. The Syllabus of Errors is made obsolete.So there is no more the past exlusive ecclesiology with an ecumenism of return. All this is not magisterial but heretical.

So once Fr.Gasparri had an insight into this, he realized that the mistake was made by the popes and the CDF.He had to get rid of his original premise on the Magisterium being always correct and that the present popes could not make a mistake on faith and morals.

He knew there were no defacto cases of the baptism of desire. This is  a fact of life. This is a given.

So when the CDF assumes there are de facto and practical exceptions to the dogma EENS, it implies there are known cases of the baptism of desire etc.

This is irrational. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.

So how could this be magisterial ?

Once it is known that there are only hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes. The Council( without the error) is in harmony with magisterial documents. The Creeds and Catechisms are in harmony with Vatican Council II. This is rational and this would be magisterial.

So when he realized that the 'magisterium' had really made a mistake everything fell into place : the interpretations became rational and Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the past ecclesiology and EENS.-Lionel Andrades

 





 
1
 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/but-its-magisterial.html

The present two popes, Jimmy Akins and Matthew Cullinan Hoffman(LifeSite News) assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.Then they change the understanding of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) defined by three Church Councils, reject the Athanasius Creed and they change the meaning of the Nicene and Apostles Creed. This is heresy. It is obstinate and repeated

Akin believes he can refute the Open Letter and rescue Pope Francis from the charge of heresy by way of technicality, noting that “heresy” is defined in the Code of Canon Law as the obstinate rejection of a dogma defined by the Church as divinely revealed, that is, as a part of the deposit of faith left to the Church by Christ and the apostles. Akin then observes that none of the texts cited by the open letter as being contradicted by Pope Francis are shown by the letter to be defined in this way, ergo there is no heresy demonstrated. -Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

1

  “heresy” is defined in the Code of Canon Law as the obstinate rejection of a dogma defined by the Church as divinely revealed,

The present two popes, Jimmy Agins and Matthew Cullinan Hoffman(LifeSite News) assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.Then they change the understanding of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) defined by three Church Councils, they reject the Athanasius Creed and they change the meaning of the Nicene and Apostles Creed. This is heresy.It is obstinate and repeated.

1.Since hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are non hypothetical and so they become practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.The result is a rupture to EENS. It is assumed wrongly that there is salvation outside the Church and it is known in personal cases. So EENS is put aside or there is a new version. 

2.Since there is known salvation outside the Church and the dogma EENS is obsolete with known cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I, the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation, is made redundant too.More heresy.

3.Since there is known salvation outside the Church the Nicene Creed is re-interpreted as 'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood and ignorance outside the Church and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church".More heresy.It is also official and part of the Profession of Faith.

4.So the Apostles Creed really means that we believe in the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, we believe in the Holy Spirit which teachs the Catholic Church today that outside the Church there is known salvation and so all do not necessarily need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.

Etc,etc.,

-Lionel Andrades

 1

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/critics-do-a-disservice-to-open-letter-on-pope-francis-heresies-by-ignoring-its-core-arguments

Italian Family Minister endorses procession of reparation for Gay Pride

ROME, May 31, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — Italy’s Minister for the Family has openly endorsed a “Procession of Reparation to the Sacred Heart” being held in the northern Italian city of Modena on Saturday, June 1. The aim of the procession is to atone for a “gay pride” event being held in the city the same day.
Asked about the event in a recent video interview, Lorenzo Fontana, Minister for the Family and vice-secretary for Italy’s Northern League party, said he “absolutely agrees” with the procession. 
“I am happy that you all are doing this, and I wish you good luck,” Fontana told organizers. “Let’s hope that no one thinks he can prevent a public demonstration, which is democratic. I hope that you will be able to do your best, because certain Christian values are the foundation of our history, our identity and our tradition, and we need to uphold them.”
LifeSite spoke to one of the key organizers, Cristiano Lugli, ahead of the procession. Lugli, a young layman, talked about the importance of this public act of reparation, particularly in light of the “LGBT” lobby’s tightening grip on Italian school children through the promotion of gender theory in the classroom. 
Lugli also discussed the need for the Vatican to speak out. “The Holy See sometimes speaks against gender theory,” he said, “but then it receives ‘LGBT’ activists. This is a very serious matter.” 
He said that he and other organizers have received “every kind of insult” and “even death threats” for organizing the procession.
“We are not surprised by the gays or atheists who insult us,” he noted, “but by those ‘Catholics’ who tell us that we will burn in hell for having organized a reparation procession.”  
Many people, he said, have even invoked Pope Francis’s words to criticize the procession, telling organizers: “Who are you to judge?” 
“Unfortunately,” Lugli said, “the Church of Rome also has a great responsibility, since it has stopped teaching the Catechism and opened itself to the ideas of the world for fear of being judged. But it is the Church that has always judged the world, not vice versa.” 
“If the Church no longer stands as the guardian of the one Truth who is Jesus Christ, then everything becomes relative.”  
Here below is our interview with Cristiano Lugli on the Procession of Reparation.

Continued

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/italian-family-minister-endorses-procession-of-reparation-for-gay-pride-event-in-modena