The Left can tolerate Michael and Peter Dimond's Feeneyite EENS since they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise ( instead of without it) and so negate Feeneyite EENS. -Lionel Andrades
Tuesday, November 24, 2020
When Scott Hahn came into the Catholic Church the whole Church was in a crisis. It has been like this since Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without it
When Scott Hahn came into the Catholic Church the whole Church was in a crisis. It has been like this since Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without it. -Lionel Andrades
Cushingism is a major issue in the Catholic Church and Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn are part of the crisis
Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn continue to promote the new book without addressing the Cushingite error : 'possibilities of salvation in inculpable ignorance known only to God are not practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2020-2021.'
Cushingism is a major issue in the Catholic Church and Martin and Hahn are part of the crisis.. -Lionel Andrades
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in inculpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in inculpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically. -Lionel Andrades
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in culpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in culpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically. -Lionel Andrades
The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical. Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI
The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical.
Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI.-Lionel Andrades
By assuming 'possibilities' are real people in the present times and 'practical exceptions' to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church Pope Benedict created the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclsiology etc.Now Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd like liberals are doing the same thing
By assuming 'possibilities' are real people in the present times and 'practical exceptions' to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church Pope Benedict created the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclsiology etc.Now Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd like liberals are doing the same thing. -Lionel Andrades
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd do not outright say that all non Catholics, Protestants included, are on the way to Hell.Since the both of them do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the missionaries.They cannot affirm these Church documents since for them 'theoretical and hypothetical possibilities', which exist only in our mind, are 'objective exceptions' to Tradition( e.g Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) etc). This was the ruse used by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria to reject exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd do not outright say that all non Catholics, Protestants included, are on the way to Hell.Since the both of them do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the missionaries.They cannot affirm these Church documents since for them 'theoretical and hypothetical possibilities', which exist only in our mind, are 'objective exceptions' to Tradition( e.g Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) etc).
This was the ruse used by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria to reject exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades
Matt Fradd does not quote St.Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and he presents 'theoretical possibilities' as 'practical exceptions' to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which he does not affirm
Matt Fradd does not quote St.Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and he presents 'theoretical possibilities' as 'practical exceptions' to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which he does not affirm. -Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
