Friday, June 26, 2020

USCCB Living as Missionary Disciples is based on Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise instead of without it

Living as Missionary Disciples Book CoverIt promotes a Catechesis affirming Jesus without the membership in the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation ( to avoid Hell). It is Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric.
Since the USCCB policy is to  interpret invisible cases (LG 8, LG 14,LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II) as being objective and visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, there is an artificial and false conclusion.It creates a rupture with the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church, which affirmed exclusive salvation.So traditional Mission is rejected.Vatican Council II has exceptions to the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation.This is all accomplised by mixing up what is subjective as objective, invisible as visible.
-Lionel Andrades.

http://www.usccb.org/about/evangelization-and-catechesis/
http://ccc.usccb.org/flipbooks/living-as-missionary-disciples/files/assets/basic-html/page-I.html#


A (Feeneyite)




B (Cushingite)



















The New Directory for Catechesis being sold by the USCCB interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise (Graphics )


-Lionel Andrades


 NOVEMBER 20, 2019


The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )




-Lionel Andrades


NOVEMBER 20, 2019


 NOVEMBER 20, 2019

The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html

__________________________________________


NOVEMBER 20, 2019


The National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational. So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc.



NOVEMBER 20, 2019

Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj. 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html





 


USCCB Doctrinal Committee uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II



JUNE 26, 2020


Bishop Kevin Rhoades uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II: UCCB Notification on Fr. Peter C.Phan limited

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/bishop-kevin-rhoades-uses-false-premise.html


  
-Lionel Andrades


JUNE 16, 2020

CDF is not magisterial on Vatican Council II ( Graphics )







-Lionel Andrades





JUNE 15, 2020


The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. Since there are two interpretations of the Council.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational, one is with the false premise and the other is without it.The CDF chooses the irrational interpretation.