Sunday, December 30, 2012

SSPX NEVER BROUGHT SCHONBORN'S ERROR TO THE ATTENTION OF CDF PREFECTS

The SSPX is letting Cardinal Schonborn get away again.They should be out there pointing out his precise theological error and calling press conferences.

Archbishop Gerhard Muller the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican said that those who interpret the Council as a break with Tradition are heretical. He was referring to all camps, traditionalists and progressives.

Archbishop Christoph Schonborn when questioned by the media agreed with Archbishop Muller but also added that in Vatican Council II there was ' a doctrinal development' !!

Christoph Schönborn (Gerusalemme, 08.11.2007).JPG


For progressives a doctrinal development means accepting 'the theology of religions', the 'ecclesiology of communion' and the 'ecumenism of non return'. This is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Social Reign of Christ the King.


Disobedient Schonborn has no text in Vatican Council II to support his new theology.Since the Council does not mention anyone in particular saved outside the church i.e without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water. References to invincible ignorance, a good conscience, seeds of the word etc are in-principle cases, accepted hypothetically and known only to God.So the Council does not cite any case which contradicts the traditional teaching on other religions.


A doctrine develops from the time it is discussed before a Council, until it is made a dogma.There is no development of a defined dogma.A new or nuanced understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus cannot say there is known salvation outside the church.Since the dogma does not say it and rationality tells us that we do not know any such case personally.At least Vatican Council II does not say this . Neither does the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.


So what is the theological basis for Cardinal Schonborn's development of doctrine ? From where comes this new revelation which is the basis for his doctrinal development?


The progressives have built their theological house on straw. Doctrine and dogmas have an inherent precision about them, something like mathematics and a way of asserting itself. Cardinal Schonborn has no rational theology to support himself and prop his falling theological structures.

No one from the SSPX calls attention theologically to this mistake of Cardinal Schonborn. Since they too assume like the progressives that the dead are visible.So for them too there are known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions. There is a development of doctrine  in Vatican Council II for the SSPX. Ironic?!

From the CDF Prefects Ottaviani to Muller, the traditionalists have never called attention to the Schonborn error, every time it surfaces.

The Austrian cardinal should be explained to, that the dead man walking on earth, is not a basis for the development of doctrine. Ad Gentes 7 makes the Council traditional with respect to other religions and ecumenism.To claim that the dead who are saved are visible to us is 'extreme irrationality' aside from contributing to an 'extreme interpretation' of the Council.

No text in the Council says non Catholic religions are the ordinary means of salvation or that their members do not have to convert for salvation. No text in the Council says implicit salvation is explicit. No text says those cases which we accept in principle are actually also defacto and explicitly known to us humans.-Lionel Andrades

THERE IS NO DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT IN VATICAN COUNCIL II AS CARDINAL CHRISTOPH SCHONBURG ALLEGES : SINCE THE COUNCIL DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE TRADITIONAL TEACHING ON OTHER RELIGIONS


DID CARDINAL ALFREDO OTTAVIANI KNOW THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE WERE NOT RELEVANT TO THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ?


SSPX CORRECT YOUR DOCTRINAL ERROR AND APPEAL TO THE CDF TO DO THE SAME


SSPX PRIESTS SPEAK THE TRUTH HONESTLY,COURAGEOUSLY...


DOCTRINAL ERROR OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE AND SSPX BISHOPS POSTED A NEW ON U.S WEBSITE