Saturday, August 25, 2012

PACKAGE OF HERESY

When Bishop Bernard Fellay,Superior General of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) last  left the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith building he was given a dossier of heresy.

According to Fr. Franz Schmidberger, speaking to the German media, the SSPX were expected to accept certain theological positions which were unwelcome to the SSPX.


Since the magisterium has accepted Vatican Council II with the false premise, the Richard Cushing error, what they produce theologically is likely to be ‘bad fruit’.


The dossier of heresy given to the SSPX is expected since the  Curia uses the premise ‘there are non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance etc who are visible to us on earth’.


Then the Curia concludes: there is salvation outside the Church since we know these exceptions. So  they reject the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with this interpretation of Vatican Council II. This is heresy.


So theologically for the Curia there can be an ecclesiology of communion and a theology of religions and the SSPX has to accept these heretical teachings which contradict the dogma.
This is a package of heresy and the SSPX is smart enough not to fall for it.-Lionel Andrades

DO YOU HAVE A VOCATION? AVOID A COMMUNITY WHICH INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE FALSE PREMISE OF SEEING THE DEAD VISIBLE

Travel to Worcester and Manchester,USA where Catholic religious communities do not make this mistake.


If you are young and deciding on a vocation ask the Vocation Diretor a few questions and you will know the truth.


The odds are that the community is in heresy. So make plans to travel to Worcester, contact the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the community for men and women religious.


However to find out the truth for yourself ask the Vocation Director if he can see anyone on earth saved and now also in Heaven, and who yet can also be seen on earth?


He should say no. He cannot see the dead .


Then ask him if he can see anyone one earth who is saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience, seeds of the Word, imperfect communion with the Church etc? He should reply no.


Then finally ask him the question: Does every one need to convert into the Church with no known exception for salvation?


Hopefully he will say yes but most probably he will say no.


He may then say there could be non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance etc. Contradicting himself!


The Vocation Director and his community could have a problem with Vatican Council II. For him the Council says there is salvation outside the Church.Why ? Since they can see the dead saved and who are on earth.They are supposed to be exceptions to every one needing to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.


Call up the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary .They do not claim that they can see the dead-visible.


They say everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation .Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.


If you live in Southwark,U.K don’t wait. Call them up right now.


The Vocation Director of Southwark tells me that they expect all candidates with a religious vocation to affirm that they can see the dead visible.So there is salvation outside the Church according to Vatican Council II.


Even traditionalists like Fr.Tim Finnigan from Southwark has the same view.They can see the dead.


Likewise Fr.Joe Jenkins in Washington ,USA will not admit that he cannot see the dead at night or during the day.


This is also a problem with some traditionalists attending a conference underway in Washington this week end.


The problem is severe e.g the Vocation Director at Southwark says that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 criticized Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston for not being able to see these ghosts who were known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma.

Remember to reject a defined dogma like extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to reject Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7 which says all need Catholic Faith for salvation is heresy. Why join a community which interprets Vatican Council II with heresy.-Lionel Andrades







MULLER -LADARIA-KOCH VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERESY WITH THE CUSHING' VISIBLE - DEAD' EXCEPTIONS.


The Vatican Curia version of the Council is a break with a defined dogma and it contradicts Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.


The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has the option of accepting Vatican Council II  without  the Cushing Error and so in harmony with all Catholic Tradition.


The Vatican Curia version of the Council says there is salvation outside the Church. This error is based on being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance etc who are cited as exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.


This is irrational and non traditional.Bishop Gerhard Muller Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith does not know anyone  on earth saved with a good conscience, seeds of the word, imperfect communion with the church etc who cold contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.

The SSPX would be in heresy if they accepted the Vatican Curia version of the Council.
-Lionel Andrades

PHIL LAWLER WANTS THE SSPX TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH HERESY-JUST LIKE JEFF MIRUS


Vatican Council II with the false premise of the visible-dead leads to heretical conclusions.Vatican Council II without the false premise of the visible dead is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The interpretation of Vatican council Ii of Jeff Mirus rejects the Nicene Creed (one baptism for the forgiveness of sin-not three baptisms), a dogma Cantate Domino, Council of Florence1441 (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and the Syllabus of Errors.

Writing for Catholic Culture Phil Lawler who peronally affirms the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and yet , in a contradiction assumes Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) etc are exceptions to the dogma, wants the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) to say Yes to Vatican Council II i.e the heretical version with the visible dead theory.

He does not realize that if the SSPX accepts the Muller-Ladaria version of Vatican Council II it would be  heresy. Since this version because of the Richard Cushing Error , assumes there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. If the SSPX accepts this version of the Council they will be in a first class heresy, and in public mortal sin. They will be denying a defined dogma on salvation and also Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, with alleged exceptions known to no one on earth.This is heresy even after being informed.

The SSPX Chapter communique (July 19,2012) has made it it possible for the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II as part of 'the uninterrupted magisterium' of the Church.The communique says there are no exceptions to the dogma.Lumen Gentium 16 etc are not exceptions to anything. We have a traditional Council in Vatican Council II with an ecclesiology which is traditional.

So Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirms the SSPX position on other religions and ecumenism ( 'all need Catholic Faith for salvation ) and religious liberty ( which is a consequence of accepting the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus)

So this is not a break with Tradition but a continuity.The Vatican Curia version is without the hermeneutic of continuity and is also public heresy.This version is also being used by Catholic Culture.
-Lionel Andrades