Friday, January 19, 2018

Marcia per la Vita Roma Maggio 19, 2018


The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is in schism with the past magisterium of the Church since cardinals Ratzinger, Muller, Ladaria and other Prefects, are using Cushingite theology instead of traditional and non heretical Feeneyite theology.






The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is in schism with the past magisterium of the Church since cardinals Ratzinger, Muller, Ladaria and other Prefects, are using Cushingite theology instead of traditional and non heretical Feeneyite theology.So the CDF interprets Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture.If the CDF used Feeneyite theology Vatican Council II would have a hermeneutic of continuity with the past.
For doctrinal unity and rationality in the Church the CDF needs to ask the German, British, U.S and other bishops  and the SSPX, FSSP and other traditionalists,to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational premise to elicit a traditional conclusion.
The CDF must ask the German bishops and the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is is the only rational option.
-Lionel Andrades

The CDF must ask the German bishops and cardinals and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). It's the only rational interpretation of the Council.




The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) must affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) which is the solution for the doctrinal crisis in the Catholic Church today.
The CDF must acknowledge that Vatican Council II is Cushingite but it can be re-interpreted with Feeneyite theology.We then have a hermeneutic of continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church which supported an ecumenism of return.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) would not have a hermeneutic of rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.Vatican Council II (F) would not be a rupture with the authentic magisterium of the past, including that of the 16th century.
Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is Masonic and Catholics are not obliged to follow it . We do not have to choose between the baptism of desire(BOD) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), since there are no known cases of BOD.This was a ruse of the liberal theologians.Ratzinger,Rahner and Kung maintained the error.The enemies of the Church brought in and supported this new theology based on a false philosophical premise.Even today they are not admitting that they are wrong.
Invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance could not be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.So the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston made a mistake, an objective mistake.The Letter introduces Cushingite theology into the Church, openly and brazenly.
Even though the clarification has not yet come from the CDF, Catholics can choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.They can choose Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) since it is rational and based on common sense-the  obvious BOD, BOB and I.I could not and cannot be exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members for salvation.They are not known examples of salvation outside the Church. So they could only be known to God if they happened.
The CDF must ask the German bishops and cardinals and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). It's the only rational interpretation of the Council.-Lionel Andrades