The blogger at Introibo Ad Altare Dei (IAAD) has responded to the last post which I have sent him.He has posted it in the comments section of his blog post The Laver of Regeneration. His reply his full of confusion and he still has not understood the basic point I was trying to make. It was that the baptism of desire and blood could not be relevant to the dogma since they do not and cannot exist in our reality.So whenever any one, he included, implies they are relevant to the dogma, they are inferring that they can see and know people who are now in Heaven.This is ridiculous. Yet they are not aware of the strange inference they make.
In this correspondence it was good of IAAD to agree with the obvious : that the baptism of desire cases are not visible to us on earth.It must have been difficult for him, for whatever reason. However he still will not answer if Lumen Gentium 16 also refers to a visible for us case in 2015.The answer is obvious but I could not find it in the complicated response I re-produce here from the comments section of his blog.
I am going through wade though his answer.-L.A
The Catechism(1992) assumes BOD and BOB are explicit : this is the mistake in Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Letter of the Holy Office