Monday, June 26, 2017

Sedes and trads have chosen the interpretation of the Masons and liberals : they deny Jesus as He was known before Pius XII


Image result for Photo of Douay Rheims Bible
June 25,2017 
Gospel Reading

Jesus said to the Twelve:
"Fear no one.

Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed,

nor secret that will not be known.

What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light;

what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.

And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul;

rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy

both soul and body in Gehenna.

Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin?

Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father's knowledge.

Even all the hairs of your head are counted.

So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.
Everyone who acknowledges me before others
I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.
But whoever denies me before others,
I will deny before my heavenly Father."
Matthew 10:26-33

Pamphlet

Piazza Navona Pictures

VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS ALL MUSLIMS, JEWS IN ROME, ITALY ARE GOING TO HELL

Contrary to what your parish priest has been saying Vatican Council II indicates that all Muslims and Jews in Rome and Italy are on the way to Hell.
So get this message across to the people so that they can conduct Catholic Mission and Evangelization based on the truth.
Do not hide it from Catholics in the parishes that the Bible, the Church and of course Vatican Council II says Jews and Muslims need to convert into the Catholic Church to go to Heaven. All of them.
The Council says this is in two important places .In Ad Gentes 7 it says all people need Catholic Faith and the Baptism of water for salvation. All means everyone with no exceptions.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.
Then Ad Gentes 7 also says those who know about Jesus and the Catholic Church and yet do not enter are on the way to Hell. In Italy Muslims and Jews know about Jesus and the Catholic Church. It is a mortal sin of faith when they do not enter the Catholic Church.
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.-Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
-Lionel Andrades
________________________________


Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.
But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father."-Matthew 10:32-33

Image result for Photo of Bishop Donald SanbornImage result for Photo of Bishop Mark A.Pivarunas
The sedevantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Bishop Mark A.Pivarunas deny the above passage from yesterday's Gospel. They renege.They do not  proclaim that it is necessary to believe in Jesus and the Church for salvation, in harmony with Vatican Council II the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and other magisterial documents. Instead they say that the popès from John XXIII to Francis were wrong.They were heretics. They however accept Pope Pius XII.
When it is pointed out to the sedevacantists and traditionalists that Pope Pius XII was wrong when he assumed that invisible for us baptism of desire was a visible exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, they still insist that Pius XII is magisterial for them, but not those popes who followed him.Even though he was irrational and non traditional he is magisterial for them.But how can invisible people be visible exceptions? It does not matter!
When asked how can they reject the popès from John XXIII to Francis they would say that as sedevacantists and traditionalists they affirm the old ecclesiology of the Church and these popes  have rejected it through Vatican Council II.
So it is O.K for them to believe that the popes since John XXIII made a mistake but not Pius XII.
The sedevacantists will say all Jews and Muslims need to enter the Church except for those in invincible ignorance etc since this was approved by Pope Pius XII in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.This is what the Masons and the liberals also believe. They agree.There is no contradiction here for them.Why? Since Archbishop Lefebvre could not have made a mistake??
So when I Lionel  accept that Pius XII made a mistake and theoretical and hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II  cannot be explicit exceptions to Feeneyite EENS it means there is  another interpretation of Vatican Council? Vatican Council II is traditional on Feeneyite EENS and the old ecclesiology ? There would be no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II. Invisible cases cannot be exceptions to EENS in,for example 2017.
Image result for Photo of Pope John XXIIIImage result for Photo of Pope Paul VI
Then would the popes since John XXIII still be in error?
No answer.
Since I can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors  how could the popes since John XXIII be in heresy when Vatican Council II is not heretical?
But they will not proclaim that VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS ALL MUSLIMS, JEWS IN ROME, ITALY ARE GOING TO HELL
Image result for Photo of Grand orient Masons in Romes
It is the same with the liberals and Masons.

Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.
But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father."-Matthew 10:32-33

They do not acknowledge Jesus' Church before others and claim that the popes since John XXIII are in heresy when really it is their fault. They  mix up hypothetical and non existing cases as being an exception to the dogma EENS, when there really cannot be exceptions.
Jesus has said that all need the baptism of water for salvation in the Catholic Church (John 3:5, Mark 16:16) and they say, 'No. Not all'. There are exceptions of...'.It is as if  they know of someone saved as such, some practical exception to EENS.
Image result for Photo of Nicene Creed
The Nicene Creed states 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'. The sedevacantists and traditionalists say, "False. I believe in not one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins in 2017 but three or more, they are the baptism of desire, blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word (AG 11) etc".The liberals and Masons agree with them here.They are all magisterial. So there are three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins.
When I say that I believe in the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS, since it is magisterial in the Church before and after Vatican Council II, they disagree. They say that EENS has been contradicted by Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura etc which refer to being saved in  invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. In other words they are explicit and objective cases in the past or present and so they are relevant to EENS.When told that this is what the liberals and Masons also believe-they agree.
Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.
But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father."-Matthew 10:32-33
This is how  the sedevacantists and traditionalists  acknowledge Jesus and His Church, His Mystical Body, before others.
Image result for Photo of Pope pius XII
They deny Jesus as he was known in the Church for centuries.
Instead they have chosen the interpretation of the Masons and liberals which is heretical and a denial of the Faith as it was known before the time of Pius XII -Lionel Andrades