Thursday, March 20, 2014

Even Tom Mohniyan's Ave Maria University adhere's fully to Ex Corde Ecclesiae and interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise

Kathy Sinnott, a former member of the European Parliament, is leading efforts to found a new Catholic college in Ireland, according to an Irish media report.
Students at Newman College Ireland “will be encouraged to learn the unity of truth, and to see the goodness, truth and beauty of creation, as well as the inviolable dignity of human life, which is threatened in our time by an eclipse of the sense of God,” according to its website.
The college pledges to “adhere fully” to Ex Corde Ecclesiae, Blessed John Paul II’s apostolic constitution on Catholic universities (1)
Tom Monaghan
Even Tom Mohniyan's Ave Maria University,  USA adhere's fully to Ex Corde Ecclesiae and interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise.So the Council is a break with Tradition.
The other Catholic Universities also do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of being able to see the dead-saved who are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.
So Kathy Sinnott's Catholic college will be another liberal, dissenting one.

According to the University of Dallas, a Catholic university:

Our mission is to prepare women and men for pastoral service within the Catholic Church. In accord with Ex Corde Ecclesiae, our programs offer instruction and formation "by which Catholic students can, in fulfillment of their baptism, be prepared for active participation in the life of the Church."

The University of Dallas' Theology Department /School of Ministry and the Catechetical Office of the Catholic Diocese of Dallas, USA are using an irrational premise in the interpretation of magisterial documents. So the teaching is liberal, dissenting and non traditional.

If they are aware of the premise and avoid it then the Ave Maria University and the University of Dallas would be saying all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7, Vatican Council II) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So in Heaven there are only Catholics who are there with no mortal sin on their soul and who have Catholic Faith and were baptized with water (AG 7). The majority of people who die in 2014 are oriented to Hell since they have not converted with 'faith and baptism'. This is the teaching of Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise of there being visible exceptions.
 
Dr. Michael Dauphinais is the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dean of Faculty, Associate Professor of Theology, at the Ave Maria University Fl.

The faculty at Ave Maria University Fl.,and the University of Dallas have been informed but they are not willing to comment on this issue. Ex Corde Ecclesiae does not oblige them to use an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church yet they continue with this irrationality.
-Lionel Andrades

Tom Monaghan steps down as CEO at Ave Maria University - VIDEO/PHOTOS



(1)
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=20773

Fr.John Hunwicke and participants at the Roman Forum Meeting this summer will be unaware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error

The participants at the Roman Forum Gardone Meeting this summer( 30 June – 11 July 2014) will going in circles discussing Vatican Council II, unaware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error.

Fr John Hunwicke one of the speakers writes in a comment on Protect the Pope March 19, 2014 
 

The Council, as a Pastoral Council, addressed the world of its own day, offering an analysis of that day and proposing answers to what it saw as the problems of that day. Our own day is very different, with different problems. Sooner or later, the Church will either have to come to a mind about what, in the Conciliar documents, is of permanent value; or, more probably, the Council will just disappear gently into the past, having become part of the general background noise of the Church. Just like, for example, the Council of Vienne. …er … what’s that? You’ve never heard of the Council of Vienne?
My point exactly.

He is repeating what  Dr.John Dudley of the Fischer More College said in an address to the students. They are both going in circles.They are unaware of the objective error they are making in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Dr.John Rao and Mgr.Dr.Ignacio Barreiro are aware of the irrational interpretation in Vatican Council II but they are personally not going to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus.For personal reasons it would be difficult for them to accept in public that Vatican Council II affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is difficult for them to say that there are no known exceptions mentioned in the Council.
 
Career wise they could be comfortable with Vatican Council II being a break with the past.
 
Vatican Council II is a traditionalist's Council.However to admit this in public is to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to ask for persecution.
-Lionel Andrades

Faculty, Clergy, Musicians at the Roman Forum Meeting

Dr. Miguel Ayuso Torres (University of Madrid)
Rev. Mgr. Dr. Ignacio Barreiro Carámbula (Human Life International)
James Bogle, Esq. (President of Una Voce International; Author, A Heart for Europe)
Andrew Cichy (Musical Director, Merton College, Oxford)
Dr. Danilo Castellano (University of Udine)
Rev. Bernard Danber, O.S.A.
Bernard Dumont (editor, Catholica, France)
Christopher A. Ferrara, J.D. (President, A.C.L.A.)
Rev. John Hunwicke (Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham)
Michael J. Matt (Editor, The Remnant)
Professor John Médaille (University of Dallas)
Rev. Dr. Richard Munkelt (University of Fairfield)
Dr. John C. Rao (St. John’s University)
Dr. Thomas Stark (Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule, Austria)



March 20, 2014
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/always-in-interpretation-of-vatican.html#links

http://www.romanforum.org/symposium/summer2014/

Always in the interpretation of Vatican Council II we have to be aware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error

Always in the interpretation of Vatican Council II we have to be aware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error.

What is the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error?

It is assuming that all references to 'salvation' in Vatican Council II are  physically visible to us on earth and since these cases are allegedly seen objectively, they are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities.

Also called the Richard Cushing Error it does not make the distinction between the concepts objective-subjective, explicit-implicit, defacto-dejure etc.Instead it implies that what is invisible for us in real life is actually visible.

This is a factual error. We cannot see the deceased now saved in Heaven. There are no explicit exceptions on earth to the traditional teaching on all needing to convert into the Church.This is an objective error. Objectively we cannot name any one in 2014 who is an exception to all needing to convert into the Church for salvation.
 
In the text of Vatican Council II we see so many statements which are salvation-possibilities but not exceptions to the dogma. They are known only to God. With the Cushing-Jesuit Error what is only a hypothetical possibility for us and known only to God is  made to appear relevant to the dogma on salvation and the traditional teaching on other religions and Christian communities.

These dead wood statements, flotsam and jetsam statements, are found in Ad Gentes 7 of Vatican Council II. They refer to what is implicit, invisible for us and not objectively known. So they are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism). They are not exceptions since the text of Vatican Council II does not state that they are exceptions to the dogma and in real life they are not explicit for us.

Once this distinction is made Vatican Council II no where contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by the saints Robert Bellarmine, Francis of Assisi, Maximillian Kolbe and, Fr. Leonard Feeney, who held the traditional interpretation of the dogma on salvation.

Here are examples of ther Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error in Vatican Council II.
1.

Meeting God in Friend and Stranger Nostra Aetate
..there are elements of truth and holiness in other religions and acknowledges that the Holy Spirit is at work in them. Other religions contain ‘seeds of the Word’ and ‘a ray of the one Truth’. God’s good plan, and the promise of eternal life, applies to every human being. At the same time, Christ is the only one through whom it is possible to come to this eternal life. What is true and holy in other religions does not replace the Good News of Chris-tianity, but can create a fertile environment for it.
http://www.cbcew.org.uk/CBCEW-Home/Departments/Dialogue-and-Unity/Other-Religions/Bishops-Document
Other religions contain ‘seeds of the Word’ and ‘a ray of the one Truth’. God’s good plan, and the promise of eternal life, applies to every human being
Is the Conference of Catholic Bishops of England and Wales assuming here that non Catholics saved with the 'seeds of the Word' and 'a ray of the one Truth' are known to us in 2014 ?
Since they are  allegedly known to us they are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
What is a possibility for salvation is a known exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church?
Is this is a new doctrine with implicit for us cases being assumed to be explicit for us ?




Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits made a factual error in the text of Vatican Council II ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/message-incomplete-cardinal-cushing-and.html#links