Monday, August 22, 2016

Entrate per la porta stretta: La Chiesa cattolica è la porta stretta



Egli ha detto: Diceva dunque: «A che cosa è simile il regno di Dio, e a che cosa lo rassomiglierò? È simile a un granellino di senapa, che un uomo ha preso e gettato nell'orto; poi è cresciuto e diventato un arbusto, e gli uccelli del cielo si sono posati tra i suoi rami».

 E ancora: «A che cosa rassomiglierò il regno di Dio?  È simile al lievito che una donna ha preso e nascosto in tre staia di farina, finché sia tutta fermentata».
Passava per città e villaggi, insegnando, mentre camminava verso Gerusalemme.  Un tale gli chiese: «Signore, sono pochi quelli che si salvano?». Rispose: Rispose:  «Sforzatevi di entrare per la porta stretta, perché molti, vi dico, cercheranno di entrarvi, ma non ci riusciranno.-Luca 18-24 http://www.laparola.net/testo.php


Domani la Lettura del Vangelo dice 'entrare per la porta stretta, perché molti, vi dico, cercheranno di entrarvi, ma non ci riusciranno'.
Allo stesso modo Matteo 7:13-14 dice 'Entrate per la porta stretta, perché larga è la porta e spaziosa la via che conduce alla perdizione, e molti sono quelli che entrano per essa quanto stretta invece è la porta e angusta la via che conduce alla vita, e quanto pochi sono quelli che la trovano!'
La porta stretta è la Chiesa, la Chiesa cattolica, l'unica Chiesa che Gesù ha fondato. E 'il Corpo Mistico di Gesù (1 Cor 12: 12-31; Col 1,18; 2: 18-20; Ef 1: 22-23; 03:19; 04:13). C'era solo una Chiesa al tempo di Gesù. Non ci sono state le comunità protestanti .Non c'era una  scisma che ha creato la Chiesa ortodossa.
Per la salvezza dall'Inferno tutti bisogno di entrare nella Chiesa cattolica, ha detto Gesù.Questa è la porta stretta al di fuori non c'è salvezza. Non c'è salvezza senza Gesù nella Chiesa cattolica.
Il passaggio della Bibbia che precede domani (Domenica Agosto 21,2016)  la Lettura del Vangelo riferisce anche l'importanza della Chiesa cattolica per salvezza.
 Diceva dunque: «A che cosa è simile il regno di Dio, e a che cosa lo rassomiglierò?  È simile a un granellino di senapa, che un uomo ha preso e gettato nell'orto; poi è cresciuto e diventato un arbusto, e gli uccelli del cielo si sono posati tra i suoi rami».Luca 13:18-19
Il Regno di Dio non può essere separata dalla Chiesa dice la Dichiarazione Dominus Iesus, della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede. Gesù non può essere separata dalla Chiesa .In Atti 9: 4 Gesù si identifica con la Chiesa cattolica.
'e cadendo a terra udì una voce che gli diceva: «Saulo, Saulo, perché mi perseguiti?'Atti 9:4
La Chiesa cattolica è come l'uomo che trova un tesoro in un campo e vende di tutto per averlo. E 'la perla di grande valore.
Il regno dei cieli è simile a un tesoro nascosto in un campo; un uomo lo trova e lo nasconde di nuovo, poi va, pieno di gioia, e vende tutti i suoi averi e compra quel campo -Matteo 13:44
La Chiesa cattolica, è la perla di grande valore, è il tesoro che l'uomo trova nel campo e vende tutto per averlo, è il seme di senape e il grande albero, è il lievito ed è la porta stretta, attraverso il quale tutti devono entrare per trovare salvezza.La maggior parte delle persone non si prendono e così e così vanno nell  fuoco dell'inferno.Loro scelgono la strada larga. -Lionel Andrades
1
 http://www.laparola.net/testo.php


SATURDAY, AUGUST 20, 2016

Enter through the narrow gate : The Catholic Church is the narrow gate

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/the-gospel-reading-tomorrow-says-enter.html

Medugorje . Moment with Mary: Feast of the Queenship of Our Lady today

A Moment With Mary
http://content.streamhoster.com/embed/playlists/ua?autoPlay=1#

I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the SSPX does so with Cushingism.The SSPX could agree or disagree with me here

I mentioned yesterday that the SSPX position is such a complicated, doctrinal mess, that it is no wonder that Father Aldo Rossi had nothing to say to me yesterday morning after Holy Mass when I met him at the SSPX chapel in Rome. 1.He probably intended well but did not know from where to start.

He could start from here.

Below  are the terms I have used.
He could agree or disagree with me.
I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the SSPX does so with Cushingism.
The SSPX could agree or disagree with me here.
I use Feeneyism and the SSPX uses Cushingism.

For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.
For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.

For meVatican Council II is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.

For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.

For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.

I avoid the  New Theology, while the SSPX uses it. 

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for the SSPX it is Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades




TERMS EXPLAINED

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no  known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.

Cushingism:  It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes  there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

Baptism of  Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.

Baptism of  Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.

Council of Florence.One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians:They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite):It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and  the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.

Baltimore Catechism. It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.
(The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion)
Catechism of Pope X. It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.

Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite). It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite) .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite).It  refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite).CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite).CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.

________________________

1.

SUNDAY, AUGUST 21, 2016


Don Aldo Rossi, SSPX Prior had nothing to say to me today morning

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/don-aldo-rossi-sspx-prior-had-nothing.html

In this way we can have a Cushingite or Feeneyite Vatican Council II.The Cushingite interpretation is irrational.However it is the interpretation of the SSPX and that of Fr. Aldo Rossi and the other SSPX priests in Italy

Did you mean baptism of desire?  For we can, that is, it is possible, for us to see physically people in heaven or earth saved with baptism of water, as several instances of it have occurred, as in the case of Fatima, etc.
What am I missing?
Lionel:
I am glad you asked this is at the centre of what I am saying.
I mean that in August 2016 we are unable in general to physically see someone in Heaven or on earth saved with the baptism of desire, without the baptism of water.
So the baptism of desire today August22,2013, for us humans, can only be a theoretical subject.It is something hypothetical. We can accept it as a possibility.Only!
Now for there to be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS),there would have to be someone in 2016 who is physically visible or we must know him or her personally.We could know his or her name and surname.So then we can say, "See, XYZ is an exception to the dogma EENS, since he has been saved without the baptism of water.It is a known case.So everyone does not need to formally enter the Church for salvation, every one does not need to be Catholic to avoid Hell.There are exceptions to the dogma"
So for the SSPX and FSSP to assume that the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma EENS, would mean that they know or can know someone who is an exception to EENS.This is impossible!
There cannot be any exception!
Yet the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that the baptism of desire was an exception to EENS and this was accepted by the magisterium and Archbishop Lefebvre.
The Council of Trent mentions 'the desire theorof' but did not call it a baptism nor did it state that it referred to an explicit case or that it was an exception to EENS.It was something said with good will.Yet all these errors had to be assumed by liberal theologians.
Cardinal Gibbons in Baltimore interpreted 'the desirethereof' as being a baptism like the baptism of water.Cardinal Cushing in Boston assumed that the baptism of desire was explicit and so an exception to EENS.
So what was an imaginary case was assumed to be objectively known.
So now the baptism of desire in theology can be interpreted as being visible or invisible.This is a new precedent in the Church. It is from here that the New Theology takes off.
So we have a visible baptism of desire which I call Cushingism.It is an explicit exception to EENS.
And we have an invisible baptism of desire which I call Feeneyism. It is not explicit in 2016 and so is irrelevant to EENS.
campo bambine 1
In this way we can have a Cushingite or Feeneyite Vatican Council II.The Cushingite interpretation is irrational.However it is the interpretation of the SSPX and that of Fr. Aldo Rossi and the other SSPX priests in Italy.

It is also the interpretation of the FSSP priests where you live.-Lionel Andrades

MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2016

SSPX, FSSP Latin Mass a theological rupture with Tradition : but not for me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/sspx-fssp-latin-mass-theological.html

Medugorje :A Moment With Mary : On Fasting

A Moment With Mary
http://content.streamhoster.com/embed/playlists/ua?autoPlay=1#

SSPX, FSSP Latin Mass a theological rupture with Tradition : but not for me


Image result for Photo of Mass at the  SSPX chapel Rome St.Catheruine of Sienna Chapel

Neither the SSPX or FSSP priests offers the Tridentine Rite Mass as it was offered in pre- Council of Trent times.Since they  interpret Catholic doctrine with the new theology.
The new theology is a break with the old ecclesiology based on the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So at the Latin Mass in 2016 we have the liturgical form but not the ancient theology and Catholic doctrines.
For all of them there are exceptions to the traditional salvation theology associated with the 16th century missionaries, when they offered the Latin Mass.
So even for the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary , the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA, the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past.Their position is the same as the SSPX and FSSP priests in Rome.
I mentioned in the blog post yesterday (August 21,2016) that I went for Holy Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome.Father Aldo Rossi the SSPX Prior in Albano, Italy offered it at 11 a.m.There was no denial or clarificatin from him or the SSPX,Italy on my report,'SSPX has changed dogmas and doctrine' 
cappella Santa Caterina

SSPX ECLESIOLOGY
The SSPX ecclesiology is Cushingite while  mine is Feeneyite like that of the times of St. Teresa of Avila.
The SSPX has changed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the doctrines related to EENS e.g Social reign of Christ the King. They have changed the Nicene Creed and rejected the Athanasius Creed with their Cushingite new theology.
They claim to affirm Cantante Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on EENS ( Feeneyite).At the same time they affirm the baptism of desire ( Cushingite).
At the Latin Mass they recite the Nicene Creed which says and means  ' I believe in one baptism for the forgivness of sins' .However theologically they mean three or more known baptisms.Most of them are without the baptism of water.
They say Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition and mean it is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).Yet it is an EENS which in reality they do not affirm.
They say they affirm the Syllabus of Errors but the Syllabus of Errors was based on the old ecclesiology and the foundation of the old ecclesiology was EENS ( Feeneyite).The ecclesiology of the Syllabus of Errors was not EENS ( Cushingite).
For Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Pierpaolo Petrucci and the SSPX priests in Italy Lumen Gentium  14 ( catechumen saved without the baptism of water) and Lumen Gentium  16 ( saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water) is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.LG 14 and LG 16 refer to explicit cases.So they are relevant and exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.
Their position is complicated  and heretical that  Don Aldo Rossi had nothing to say yesterday  morning. He probably intended well but did not know from where to start.
campo bambine 1
However I have been saying the same things for the last three years.
Assuming he understands what I am saying is he going to say that the SSPX, FSSP, magisterium and liberals were wrong all these years?
It would be the end for him in the SSPX, if he did it alone.
He cannot constantly affirm a simple thing like we cannot physically see people in Heaven or earth saved with the baptism of water.He agrees with me when I talk to him. Then he goes back and talks to the others and changes his opinion.
How can you be confused on this ? It is  fact of life that we cannot see the soul of a person.
-Lionel Andrades


AUGUST 19, 2016

No denial from the SSPX: dogmas and doctrine changed

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/no-denial-from-sspx-dogmas-and-doctrine.html


AUGUST 16, 2016

Fraternità San Pio X cambiato dogmi e dottrine

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/fraternita-san-pio-x-cambiato-dogmi-e.html

Vieni e seguimi - Gen Rosso

Tomas Luis de Victoria - Ave Maria




http://theeye-witness.blogspot.it/2016/08/victoria-ave-maria.html

#TUSEILAMIAVITA #SYMBOLUM '77


#TUSEILAMIAVITA #SYMBOLUM '77