The National Catholic Reporter, Crux, Commonweal and
the Tablet are obsolete now – Catholics know that they can interpret Vatican
Council II rationally, traditionally and always with the hermeneutic of
continuity with Tradition. Times have changed. The NCR can now affirm the
ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal in harmony with Vatican Council II. The ecclesiology of the Latin Mass is
supported by the Council.
NO DENIAL
Joan Chittister, Helen Prejean, Father Thomas Reese
sj, Nicole Winfield, Cindy Wooden, John Allen Jr (ex-NCR) and other
contributors of the NCR make an objective and factual error in their
interpretation of Vatican Council II. No one denies it or is willing to comment.
NO COMMENT FROM THE NCR
I mentioned on this blog yesterday that 'the correspondents of the
National Catholic Reporter agree with me. They are Feeneyites on extra
ecclesiam nulla salus when they interpret Vatican Council II, rationally and honestly. They have the same theological
position as the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond, New Hampshire, on
the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II (rational). There is no denial from any one at the liberal left
National Catholic Reporter.' I have e-mailed them.
If the NCR interpreted Vatican
Council II rationally (invisible cases of LG 16 etc are invisible in 2024) they would return to Tradition.
When Vatican Council II is
interpreted with LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2 and GS 22 being only hypothetical cases
in 2024 and
so non objective
cases and
so not exceptions for the dogma EENS, the exclusivist
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the ecclesiocentric Athanasius
Creed, they hold the same doctrines on salvation as the
traditionalists. The NCR, with Vatican Council II ( rational) affirms the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass of
the 16th century. They are in harmony with the St. Benedict
Centers in the USA.
If the NCR interpreted Vatican Council II rationally (invisible cases of LG 16 are invisible) then they would be affirming ‘the strict interpretation of EENS’, the Feeneyite version of the Church Councils which defined EENS (1215 Fourth Lateran Council etc). The NCR has an obligation to correct itself on Vatican Council II and EENS since this is the norm of the Catholic Church. It is not the teaching of only the religious community the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Catholics in
general need to help the NCR correct its mistake. This is not only the responsibilty of the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire.
I repeat, interpreting Vatican Council
II and EENS rationally, honestly and traditionally, is not only the
responsibility of the St. Benedict Centers of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the USA.Since now Vatican Council II ( AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846) are Feeneyite.
All Catholic religious communities,
all, must interpret Vatican Council II rationally in harmony with Tradition in
general.
We now know that the
liberalism in the Church has come through Vatican Council II, irrational i.e. invisible
cases of Lumen Gentium 16 (being saved in ignorance, a good conscience and with
no fault of the person), for example, are interpreted as being visible examples of salvation outside the
Church in 1965-2024 and so are objective exceptions for the dogma EENS and the
traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.
The general liberalism is foreign
to the Church. It cannot exist in the name of Vatican Council II, which can
only be interpreted rationally. There is only one ethical choice.
OBLIGATION TO BE ETHICAL
The NCR has an obligation,
ethically, to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 15,
16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 in Vatican Council refer to only hypothetical cases
in 2024. It means there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II), for the past
ecclesiocentrism of the Church. The past exclusivist ecclesiology must now be
supported by all religious communities and not only the Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Centers.
PAPAL DOCUMENTS BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL
The NCR, Catholic News
Service, Catholic News Agency etc can no more justify , Amoris Laetitia ,
Traditionis Custode and Fiducia Supplicans in the name of Vatican Council II.
Since the Council must be interpreted only rationally by all- Catholics and non
Catholics. These Church Documents were issued with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and dishonestly.
TRADITIONALISTS FORTE IS VATICAN COUNCIL II
It is the Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary whose forte is now Vatican Council II and the NCR is
on the defensive.
1)
The NCR has not been able to issue a statement/report/article
on Vatican Council II as interpreted rationally by Brother Andre Marie micm,
Prior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, Richmond,
NH, USA.
2) Neither is the NCR able to
comment on the reports which state that the Prefect of Dicastery for the
Doctrine of the Faith and journalists in Rome ( Nicole Winfied, AP etc)
interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally.If they would interpret the Council rationally and so ethically, they would be Feeneyite on EENS like
the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire.
3. The faculty of theology and the rector of the University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, agree with me. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc can only be interpreted as being invisible people. They are are always only invisible in 2024.The NCR, like Reuters and the Associated Press, are not willing to interview the Theology Faculty at the Angelicum and neither the Master General of the Dominicans. There is no comment from the NCR.
CATHOLIC ANSWERS
4. Catholic Answers (Jimmy
Akins/ Karl Keating) for political reasons avoids being ecclesiocentric. So
their apologists interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to
physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times.
They adapt this objective error to their liberal apologetics.
FEENEYISM WAS THE NORM OVER THE CENTURIES
Over the centuries the Church was Feeneyite, since the baptism of desire etc were interpreted rationally (invisible cases are invisible). Feeneyism was the norm for all Catholics. It is the same today with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Feeneyism is not restricted to the St. Benedict Centers in New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Los Angeles, USA. Religious communities from, Poland, Hungary etc, who are now in Rome, are still Feeneyite. Religious communities which have correctly rejected Vatican Council II, irrational and the objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston are still traditional and Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 28, 2024
The correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter agree with me. They are Feeneyites on extra ecclesiam nulla salus when they interpret Vatican Council II, rationally and honestly. They have the same theological position as the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond, New Hampshire, on the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II (rational).There is no denial from any one at the liberal left National Catholic Reporter
MARCH 27, 2024
We are all saying the same thing when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally : Brother Andre Marie micm, Fr. Georges de Laire and the correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter : All are Feeneyites on EENS
In that dispute, the Diocese of Manchester had accused the Saint Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, of violating canon law, according to Todd & Weld. The Saint Benedict Center and its members, who call themselves, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, had promoted the position held by their founder, a Jesuit priest named Leonard Feeney, that salvation is only possible through the Catholic Church.
Feeney, who died in 1978, was excommunicated for this view, though he was later reconciled to the church.
The Southern Poverty Law Center also added the center to a list of hate groups in 2007 for its members' antisemitic beliefs.
In 2019, the Diocese of Manchester forbade Catholics from participating in activities with the center and the center from calling itself Catholic because they said that they had warned the group that their position is contrary to Vatican teaching.- Right-wing Catholic outlet Church Militant to close in April
https://www.ncronline.org/news/right-wing-catholic-outlet-church-militant-close-april
Posts
