Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Pope's moto proprio suggests there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church

Featured Image
These Christians, who following more closely the steps and teachings of the Lord Jesus, offered voluntarily and freely their life for others and persevered in this intention up to death, are worthy of particular consideration and honour.  https://zenit.org/articles/motu-proprio-on-the-offering-of-life-complete-translation/
Pope Francis refers to Christians and not Catholics since he does not follow Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in harmony with Vatican Council(Feeneyite).This is a flaw in his new moto proprio“Maiorem Hac Dilectionem .
It is not enough to believe in Jesus for salvation for a Protestant or a Catholic.This is his false politically correct teaching.
For salvation every one needs to follow the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church for salvation.Every one needs to interpret Scripture as it was traditionally intepreted in the Catholic Church before the 1940's.This is necessary for salvation.
But we have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, which is irrational and heretical. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
There was an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.This pope accepted it. He let the Jesuit priest from Boston go under the bus.
The magisterium in 1949 assumed invisible people were visible exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.This pope does the same.
This was all the wrong philosophical reasoning at Vatican Council II.He believes it is the work of the Holy Spirit. 
The passages in Vatican Council II which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.They are there since the Council Fathers did not know of the mistake made by the magisterium in 1949.They used a false premise (invisible baptism of desire is visible). This is the false new theology of Vatican Council II (Cushingism) which is the only interpretation of Vatican Council II known to the two popes.
So because of their false reasoning ( invisible cases are visible exceptions to the traditional interpretation on exclusive salvation in the Church) they interpret LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 as ' a development'.The 'deveopmet' for Pope Benedict last March 2016 in the Avvenire interview meant there are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS.So EENS is rejected.This is a pontifical error ( or mess).
Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ). Yet this is his understanding of Vatican Council II.His conclusion is false. How can invisible for us Lumen Gentium 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water ? Is this rational reasoning? Is this Catholic philosophy?
So with this false reasoning Vatican Council II becomes a break with Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors and this is promoted by Pope Francis.
 Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is  without the false premise and conclusion.It is traditional and not a rupture with the dogma EENS which the pope calls 'triumphalism'.This Vatican Council II would be in harmony with the teachings of the Church, over the centuries, guided by the Holy Spirit.But Pope Francis does not talk about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Instead he only knows an interpretation of the Council which is the result of human error.
 Pope Francis promotes the New Theology which is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.
So we have a pope who does not believe in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus( Feeneyite), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Catechisms ( Feeneyite) and he has issued another moto proprio in which he suggests that there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church.He uses philosophical subjectivism to change the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church on exclusive salvation.This is pro-Masonic. He also uses philosophical subjectivism to change moral theology.This is evident in the moral theology being taught at  Pontifical universities and in his un-apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laeitia.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-pope-francis-grants-sainthood-to-those-who-die-for-others

Ralph Martin and theologians at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit contradicted by Fr.Stefano Visintin osbn, new Rector at St. Anselm Rome

Fr.Stefano Visintin osb the new Rector at St.Anselm's University in Rome is at odds with Ralph Martin at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit who has written a book 'Will Many be Saved' in which he wrongly assumed that invisible for us baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Ralph Martin considered 'possibilities' as being being defacto known exceptions to outside the Church there is no salvation as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

Will Many Be Saved?: What Vatican II Actually Teaches and Its Implications for the New Evangelization (1988)The Urgency of the New Evangelization: Answering the Call (2013)The New Evangelization: What It Is and How It Affects the Life of Every Catholic (2012)The Catholic Church at the end of an age (1994)
Martin who has written books on Evangelisation is unable to say that Vatican Council II indicates most people are on the way to Hell since they die without faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14) and that all non Catholics in the USA and the rest of the world are also oriented to the fires of Hell, since they are not members of the Catholic Church(Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II).
Image result for Photo of Ralph Martin
Ralph Martin's premise was that there
were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS and that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was wrong instead of Cardinal Richard Cushing.He could not admit that the 
magisterium in Rome in 1949 was in heresy.
At the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit all the theology professors, including Robert Fastiggi who debated the sedevacantist Bishop Sanborn, use irrational theology.Their Cushingite theology is based on invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc being visible exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation. Since there are known cases of the baptism of desire for Ralph Martin, Robert Fastigggi and the Archbishop of Detroit there is salvation outside the Church for them and the dogma EENS is rejected. Based on known salvation outside the Church they promote a new ecumenism and are unable to say that most people on earth will not be saved since they do not have 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb the new Rector of the University of St. Anselm Rome is also theologically and doctrinally at loggerheads with the new and old Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican it was reported. His statement, that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved invincible ignorance, for them to be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is a frontal attack on the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger. He is supported by Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and numerous priests in Rome .They also state the obvious.The baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in the present times. We cannot physically see a baptism of desire case in 2017 with or without the baptism of water.We cannot meet any one saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of his own, and who was saved or will be saved outside the 
Church.

Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb the new Rector of the University of St. Anselm Rome is also theologically and doctrinally at loggerheads with the new and old Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican it was reported. His statement, that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved invincible ignorance, for them to be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is a frontal attack on the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger. He is supported by Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and numerous priests in Rome .They also state the obvious.The baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in the present times. We cannot physically see a baptism of desire case in 2017 with or without the baptism of water.We cannot meet any one saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of his own, and who was saved or will be saved outside the Church; without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
There has been no official comment from Ralph Martin on this issue.Lionel Andrades

July 11, 2017
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb new Rector University of St. Anselm at loggerheads with Cardinal Ladaria: attack on the New Theology with hard facts http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/frstefano-visintin-osb-new-rector.html

July 11, 2017
Scientist-Benedictine priest who says the baptism of desire was never an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the new Rector at St. Anselm, Rome
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/scientist-benedictine-priest-who-says.html