Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Will Pope Francis tomorrow(Thursday) say that there is known salvation outside the Church? : Cushingite document expected ?

Image result for Photos Nouvelle Theologie RevueImage result for Photo of Ladaria and Muller
Accredited journalists are informed that on Thursday 1 March 2018, at 11.00 am, in the Press Office of the Holy See, in Via della Conciliazione 54, the Press Conference will be held presenting the [encyclical] letter Placuit Deo to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on some aspects of salvation Christian. 

Speakers:

– HE Msgr. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, SI, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith;

– HE Mons. Giacomo Morandi, Secretary of the same Congregation.

https://whatisupwiththesynod.com/index.php/2018/02/27/oooo-im-so-excited/



















FEBRUARY 27, 2018

The Holy See

Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-ratzinger-and-cardinal-luiz.html











































































____________________________________



Meditation (part 1 of 2) ~ Fr Ripperger

At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.

The doctrines and theology being taught in Detroit, Michigan are vague and so they have not been opposed.The errors are being taught to seminarians and school children in religion class and is part of the New Theology of even Church Militant TV(CMTV).
Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and the Rector at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit  do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of irrational Cushingism.
They all interpret Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method.The students are not told that the passages that they identify as being against EENS are neutral passages.They are references to hypotheical cases.So they do not contradict the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II. The Feeneyite passages are orthodox and the Cushingite passages are hypothetical. The Feeneyite passages avoid the false premise(invisible people are just invisible and not visible) and the Cushingite passages depend on the premise.
Similar to Vatican Council II, EENS can also be interpreted with Feeneyism( avoid the premise) and Cushingism( the irrational premise is used) and this is not told to students and seminarians in Detroit.
Instead the seminarians are wrongly taught to interpret EENS with Cushingism i.e hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are non hypothetical.They are supposed to be personally known people saved outside the Church. This is the common inference when BOD, BOB and I.I are considered exceptions to the traditional, strict interpretation of EENS.
So magisterial documents are interpreted by all with a new and irrational theology to produce new doctrines and change the interpretation of the dogma EENS.
The reasoning used by the professors and priests violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and these new irrational theories cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
They are taught by professors Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin and  are an obvious rupture with the popes and Church Councils of the past.There is a rupture here with the Catechisms of Pope Pius X and Trent.When the past Catechisms for example, mention invincible ignorance it is assumed that this is a reference to a known person saved outside the Church. This is Cushingite theology. Similarly when Mystici Corporis etc mention BOD, BOB and I.I it is assumed that it is a reference to known salvation outside the Church and so contradicts Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston. Again this is irrational.
Dr. Fastiggi has given a talk in which he mentions Fr. Leonard Feeney critically.So with his new interpretation of EENS ( with exceptions), he uses the same reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II(with exceptions) to become a rupture with the popes of the past on EENS(with no exceptions).This is schism.
Prof. Fastiggi was perhaps not aware of this when it was pointed out to him by Bishop Donald Sanborn in the debate on Ecclesiology.
Or may be he knew but could not do anything about it since this was the common interpretation of Vatican Council II and he did not know about the Feeneyite choice.Neither did Bishop Sanborn seem to know.
This is all schism with the past popes  and in the debate Dr. Fastiggi was telling the sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn that schism was a sin and a terrible thing.
Sanborn responded that he had no other choice since Vatican Council II was a rupture with the past.He meant Vatican Council II (Cushingite).
At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.
-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 28, 2018
At Detroit theology has to be done with the teachings of the Catholic Church otherwise it becomes Protestant theology. Also it has to be done with magisterial documents interpreted without the common irrational premise.

FEBRUARY 27, 2018
Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to

FEBRUARY 27, 2018
So the charge of schism can now be made against the liberal Catholic faculty in Detroit .It can be made by Bishop Donald Sanborn against Dr.Robert Fastiggi.The tables have turned.

FEBRUARY 26, 2018
Ralph Martin, Fr.Gerald Collins, Eduardo Echeverria,Gavin D'Costa and others make an objective mistake in the Homilectic and Pastoral Review

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.They can issue a correction if they want to.


The Holy See

In 1997 Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j,President, ITC, began the elimination of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They did this by interpreting Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method.They also interpreted EENS with the invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible exceptions to EENS method. The result can be seen on the Vatican website.1 It is a webpage in Italian from the daily L'Osservatorio Romano. It is a summary of the International Theological Commissions paper Christianity and the World Religions (1997).(Il Cristianesimo e le Altre Grandi Religiono)
Since 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger has chosen to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS using an irrational premise to create a non traditional conclusion. It would be a break with EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church. So there is a new understanding of EENS for Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j.It is EENS with exceptions, a non traditional EENS.Then there is a Vatican Council II having exceptions to traditional EENS.Both are an innovation in the Church.
For me there is a Vatican Council II with no exceptions to traditional EENS .There is also a traditional EENS for me and I do not know of an EENS with exceptions.
Then as if to complete his life's work of error Pope Benedict in March 2016(Avvenire) said that EENS today( with his exceptions) is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century( there were no exceptions for them). Since for him( and not for me) there was 'a development' with Vatican Council II (with exceptions to EENS).This is the only interpretation of Vatican Council II he seems to know.So he questioned the need for mission when Vatican Council II for him( and not for me) indicates that there is salvation outside the Church.This would seem reasonble, since for him there is only a Vatican Council II with exceptions to EENS.
All this is subterfuge or an innocent mistake, Masonic or just ignorance? I don't know.
Fr.Luiz Ladaria s.j was the President of the Intenational Theological Commission when this error was made in 1997.He interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS with an objective mistake.He is now the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).
The Prefect of the CDF  does not interpret Vatican Council II like me.Neither does he interpret EENS like I do.
He has created a different version of Vatican Council II and EENS which is an innovation and differs from my traditional and rational approach.By avoiding the false premise I automatically go back to the old theology. I do not have to create any thing new.
I have no agenda to follow. I do not have to please any lobby. I am just interpreting Vatican Council II as I read it.
Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria in Christianity and the World Religions(ITC 1997) are in schism with the past Church Councils and popes.
They can issue a correction if they want to.
-Lionel Andrades


1.
COMMISSIONE TEOLOGICA INTERNAZIONALE
  IL CRISTIANESIMO E LE ALTRE GRANDI RELIGIONI
Uno studio della Commissione Teologica Internazionale*
(1997)


http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1997_cristianesimo-religioni-studio-cti_it.html

The battle begins and is centered around this dogma, because once the necessity of the Catholic Faith is denied then everything else becomes meaningless. - MHFM

 From the Most Holy Family Monastery (sedevacantist) website:
Dear Brother Dimond's
My friend says to me that you are nothing but a bunch of Feeneyites. I don't believe it for a moment. I said to him "Well I like them." And as for Fr Feeney, I like him too, especially his book of poems "In Towns and Little Towns".   How can I explain to him that you are not Feeneyites?
God bless
Michael Vincent
MHFM:
We are Catholics.  Do we agree with Fr. Feeney on the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation?  Yes, because this is what the Catholic Church teaches.  You should ask your friends if they are salvation-for-members-of-false-religions-endorsing heretics. 
Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, Sess. 7, Can. 5 on the Sacrament of Baptism, ex cathedra“If anyone says that baptism [the Sacrament] is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation (cf. Jn. 3:5): let him be anathema.”
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439:  “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church.  And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5].  The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”
Unfortunately, your friends probably despise Fr. Feeney because they despise the dogma on salvation.  Perhaps the following will cause them to reconsider their assessment of Fr. Feeney: 
DID FR. FEENEY PREDICT THE LOSS OF THE POPE? – FROM OUR BOOK ON SALVATION
Before I get into this point, I must remind the reader that we are not “Feeneyites” and that I had never heard of Fr. Leonard Feeney when I came to the same conclusion on the absolute necessity of water baptism based on the dogmatic teaching of the Catholic Church.  We don’t agree with some of Fr. Feeney’s conclusions on Justification (we believe he was mistaken in good faith on these points).     
In the following passages from Fr. Feeney’s book, Bread of Life—which is made up of Fr. Feeney’s sermons before Vatican II—he connects the eventual loss of the pope (i.e., what we have experienced with the reign of the Vatican II antipopes) to the denial of the dogma Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation. 
Fr. Leonard Feeney S.J., Bread of Life, pp. 32-33:“We have Protestants in an arrangement-religion that never knows what to call itself from one week to another, that never knows what its new minister is going to tell it from chapter to chapter of Holy Scripture.  We have Unitarians who have no faith in the assured Jesus, getting more indefinite about what Christianity meant to say.  And, of course, we have Jews evading the Faith, running away from it, pretending they do not hear the name of Jesus – pretending Christmas is not the birth of Jesus Christ, and getting civic leaders to remove ‘Merry Christmas’ from in front of City Hall and to substitute for it ‘Seasons Greetings,’ because the word ‘Christ’ in ‘Christmas’ annoys them.  All this, horrible as it is, I am prepared to cope with.
     “But imagine a priest in the Holy Roman Catholic Church, ordained by the successors of the Apostles – dedicated to the Name and purpose and Blood and robes of Jesus – sitting at Harvard College week after week and listening to religion being lectured about in invisible terms.  And imagine their going back, then, to their people and telling them about the ‘soul of the Church,’ of ‘salvation outside the Church through sincerity’ – apart from the teachings and Sacraments of Jesus Christ; and calling this arrangement ‘Baptism of Desire’...  What kind of teaching is that? That is Christmas without the manger: Good Friday without any God bleeding; Easter Sunday without any Flesh and Blood coming out of the tomb. That is the Christian Faith without any Pope – the most visible religious leader in the World!”

Fr. Feeney, writing the above passage before the Second Vatican Council, predicted the eventual loss of the pope because of the great number of heretics within the structures of the Church who denied the necessity of the Church for salvation.  This is an amazing insight! 
Fr. Feeney also notes that this heresy against the salvation dogma and the necessity of Baptism leads to “Good Friday without any God bleeding.”  Just take a look at the Novus Ordo churches to see if that has been fulfilled.  Fr. Feeney goes on to say in the same chapter:
Fr. Feeney S.J., Bread of Life, p. 42:“When the Vatican Council reconvenes, I humbly plead with our Holy Father, the Pope (Pius XII), that he will immediately gather his plenipotentiary powers of infallible pronouncement to clear up the wild confusion of visible orating (on the part of his priests and bishops) about an invisible Church – or else the gates of Hell will have all but prevailed against us.  The most visible ruler in the world, our Holy Father, in his white robe and white zuchetto, may as well take off his triple tiaraand get down from his golden throne, and leave Christianity to the kind of committee arrangements to which it is committed in the present-day America, if we keep on preaching ‘Baptism of Desire.’”
As can be seen on our video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy and on our website, this statement underlined above—the loss of the papal tiara—actually took place when Antipope Paul VI happily surrendered the papal tiara and papal pectoral cross to the representatives of the United Nations who in turn sold it to a Jewish merchant! 
When Antipope Paul VI gave away the Papal Tiara, it was symbolic of the giving away of Papal authority (although he had none to give away since he was an antipope).   But it was symbolic of how the enemies of the Church, and the non-Catholic heretics, had been allowed to take over the Church’s physical structures and create a counterfeit, non-Catholic sect (the Vatican II sect).  This insight of Fr. Feeney on the Papal Tiara is so accurate that God must have put these words into his mouth.  But it just demonstrates again that once the necessity of the Church is denied the rest of the Faith becomes meaningless.  This is why those who think that the Mass issue is the main issue, and where the battle really lies, are mistaken.  The battle begins and is centered around this dogma, because once the necessity of the Catholic Faith is denied then everything else becomes meaningless.
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholic/mhfm-not-feeneyite/#.WpWsULynHcc


The Eucharist : Communion in the hand

If we really believe what we say we believe, we should be flat on our faces before the Blessed Sacrament. Once you start thinking about it, it seems astounding that we can receive the Sacrament at all. That we are able to stay on our feet at all in Its presence is a direct act of Divine mercy. It is completely mind-boggling that we can have our sins forgiven just by going to Confession. And then receive Holy Communion? The Body and Blood of Christ, that will give us everlasting life? It’s amazing, and terrifying.

On Communion in the Hand (Here, Mr. Ed Peters, Is Why Cardinal Sarah is Absolutely Right)
Monday, February 26, 2018

On Communion in the Hand (Here, Mr. Ed Peters, Is Why Cardinal Sarah is Absolutely Right)

https://abyssum.org/2018/02/27/if-we-really-believe-what-we-say-we-believe-we-should-be-flat-on-our-faces-before-the-blessed-sacrament-once-you-start-thinking-about-it-it-seems-astounding-that-we-can-receive-the-sacrament-at-all/