"Immoral" Declaration : Murder of unborn child is a mortal sin

  

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-life-leaders-ask-bishops-to-declare-voting-for-biden-is-a-mortal-sin

The SSPX and SSPX-Resistance bishops are still using Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre as a model and are ordaining priests. The Archbishop has made a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. He did not know that the Council could be interpreted in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, when the fake premise and inference is avoided.

  

 The SSPX and SSPX-Resistance bishops are still using Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre as a model and are ordaining priests. The Archbishop has made a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. He did not know that the Council  could be interpreted in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, when the fake premise and inference is avoided.-Lionel Andrades

Michael and Peter Dimond have produced a new video criticial of Pope John Paul II. But they interpret Vatican Council II with the New Theology like the popes since Paul VI .They do not re-interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and so in harmony with their interpretation of EENS

Michael and Peter Dimond have produced a new video  criticial of Pope John Paul II. But they interpret Vatican Council II  with the New Theology like the popes since Paul VI .They do not re-interpret Vatican Council II  without the false premise and so in harmony with their interpretation of EENS.. - Lionel Andrades

Chiara Lubich's Focalarini have been so immersed in the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II that it would be difficult to re-orient themselves to Tradition, with a Vatican Council II which avoids the false premise, which creates the liberal interpretation of the Council

 Chiara Lubich's Focalarini have been so immersed  in the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II that it would be difficult to re-orient themselves to Tradition, with a Vatican Council II which avoids the false premise, which creates the liberal interpretation of the Council. . -Lionel Andrades

If the Lepanto Foundation interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise they may not be allowed to hold conferences. The Left also controls theology in the Catholic Church

 If the Lepanto Foundation interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise they may not be allowed to hold conferences. The Left also controls theology in the Catholic Church.. -Lionel Andrades

There is possibly a Jesuit, somewhere out there, who is interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise, confusing LG 16 as being an exception to Tradition, and is now preparing to make a book out of it

 There is possibly a Jesuit, somewhere out there, who is interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise, confusing LG 16 as being an exception to Tradition, and is now preparing to make a book out of it. -Lionel Andrades

So many Rosaries were prayed for the SSPX 's reconciliation with the Church and the Church's return to Traditiion. They have paid off. The unity is now possible.We only have to get rid of the Cushingite virus, the false premise in the interpretation of Magisterial documents. The doctrinal and theological liberalism in the Church will have no foundation. We have found the missing link. We now know what causes the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and how we can easily avoid it

 So many Rosaries were prayed for the SSPX 's reconciliation with the Church and the Church's return to Traditiion. They have paid off. The unity is now possible.We only  have to get rid of the Cushingite virus, the false premise in the interpretation of Magisterial documents. The doctrinal and theological liberalism in the Church will have no foundation. We have found the missing link. We now know what causes the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and how we can easily avoid it.. -Lionel Andrades

Those days of referring to 'the revolution of Vatican Council II' are over since someone could respond saying, 'LG 8 is not an exception to Fr. Leonard Feeney's strict interpretation of EENS', then set out to explain it to the naive

 Those days of referring to 'the revolution of Vatican Council II' are over since someone could respond  saying, 'LG 8 is not an exception  to Fr. Leonard Feeney's  strict interpretation of EENS', then set out to explain it to the naive.. -Lionel Andrades

Lest we forget

The children at Medugorje were shown Hell. They are still living.

Sr. Lucia at Fatima was shown Hell too.Our Lady referred to it as one of the Secrets, the First One.

Please do not say that no one in our time has been to Hell and seen it. -Lionel Andrades

I affirm Vatican Council II and am not a liberal. I affirm Tradition and am not a Lefebvrist. I affirm the strict interpretation of EENS and am not a sedevacantist. I affirm the Creeds and Catechisms but not like the present two popes. I am simply a Catholic

 I affirm Vatican Council II and am not a liberal.

I affirm Tradition and am not a Lefebvrist.

I affirm the strict interpretation of EENS and am not a sedevacantist.

I affirm the Creeds and Catechisms but not like the present two popes.

I am simply a Catholic.

-Lionel Andrades

The Profession of Faith with the false premise is modernism. Today we have modernistic 'traditionalists' and liberals. It is because of the false premise, that you and I as Catholics make a different Profession of Faith

 The Profession of Faith with the false premise is modernism. Today we have modernistic 'traditionalists'  and liberals.

It is because of the false premise, that you and I as Catholics make a different Profession of Faith. -Lionel Andrades

Fr.Thomas Weinandy has returned back to liberalism and the USCCB. He affirms the four marks of the Church interpreted with Cushingism

 Fr.Thomas Weinandy has returned back to liberalism and the USCCB. He affirms the four marks of the Church interpreted with Cushingism. -Lionel Andrades

Archbishop Carlo Vigano is still wearing his clerical vestments since he has not discarded the false premise

 Archbishop Carlo Vigano is still wearing his clerical vestments since he has not discarded the false premise.

Rome doth not protest. -Lionel Andrades

The Leftist media interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and then calls the St. Benedict Center, N.H,USA names, for not doing the same

 The Leftist media interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and then calls the St. Benedict Center, N.H,USA  names, for not doing the same. -Lionel Andrades

There wre four Catholc professors who were dismissed by Jesuit Boston College, for not interpreting EENS with the false premise

 

There wre four Catholc professors who were dismissed by Jesuit Boston College, for not interpreting EENS with the false premise.. -Lionel Andrades

https://www.vaticanocatolico.com/padre-feeney/#.X5vte25KjIU

When Fr. Anthony Pillari will teach the Baltimore Catechism he will teach it with the error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. The LOHO confuses the BOD, BOB and I.I as being objective exceptions to EENS. They are confused as being known examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. When the Baltimore Catechism was issued BOD was considered as being only hypothetical. This would be common sense.

 When Fr. Anthony Pillari will teach the Baltimore Catechism he will teach it with the error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. The LOHO confuses the BOD, BOB and I.I as being objective exceptions to EENS. They are confused as being known examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. When the Baltimore Catechism was issued BOD was considered as being only hypothetical. This would be common sense. -Lionel Andrades

The SSPX are Cushingites and the St. Benedict Centers are Feeneyites. When talking-theology this has to be recognised.Both groups prefer the Latin Mass and call themselves Catholic. For the Cushingites BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. For the Feeneyites they are not objective cases and so are not exceptions. For the Cushingites the Athanasius Creed has exceptions but for the Feeneyites there are no practical exceptions. Archbishop Carlo Vigano is a Cushingite and Brother Andre Marie MICM is a Feeneyite. The popes are Cushingites and I am a Feeneyite. For them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. For me, they are not.They are only hypothetical cases. They can be known only to God. Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA are Feeneyites on EENS but Cushngites on Vatican Council II

 The SSPX are Cushingites and the St. Benedict Centers are Feeneyites. When talking-theology this has to be recognised.Both groups prefer the Latin Mass and call themselves Catholic.

For the Cushingites BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. For the Feeneyites they are not objective cases and so are not exceptions.

For the Cushingites the Athanasius Creed has exceptions but for the Feeneyites there are no practical exceptions. 

Archbishop Carlo Vigano is a Cushingite and Brother Andre Marie MICM is a Feeneyite.

The popes are Cushingites and I am a Feeneyite.

For them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. For me, they are not.They are only hypothetical cases. They can be known only to God.

Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA are Feeneyites on EENS but Cushngites on Vatican Council II.. -Lionel Andrades

When Pope Francis says he has not shifted one millimetre from Vatican Council II ( as mentioned by Archbishop Vigano in his talk to the CIC) the pope is referring to Vatican Council II( Cushingite). He was not referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)

 When Pope Francis says he has not shifted one millimetre from Vatican Council II ( as mentioned by Archbishop Vigano in his talk to the CIC)  the pope is referring to Vatican Council II( Cushingite). He was not referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). -Lionel Andrades

Why does Bishop Donald Sanborn still choose sedevacantism ? He agrees with me. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict Tradition. Why does Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the CMRI priests and religious sisters still choose sedevacantism ?They agree with me. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Why do Michael and Peter Dimond choose sedevacantism and criticize the 'Vatican Council II sect' ? They do not have to stay with Vatican Council ( Cushingite ). Since the Council without the false premise is traditional

 Why does Bishop Donald Sanborn still choose sedevacantism ? He agrees with me. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict Tradition.

Why does Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the CMRI priests and religious sisters still choose sedevacantism ?They agree with me. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

Why do Michael and Peter Dimond choose sedevacantism and criticize the 'Vatican Council II sect' ? They do not have to stay with Vatican Council ( Cushingite ). Since the Council without the false premise is traditional. -Lionel Andrades

At the time of the Austro Hungarian Empire the old catechisms did not contradict the Athanasius Creed. Now in 2020 the baptism of desire in the Baltimore Catechism contradicts the Athanasius Creed. At that time the baptism of desire did not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). It was EENS Feeneyite. Now the the baptism of desire contradicts EENS. For the Lefebvrists and the liberals there is EENS ( Cushingite) today

 

At the time of the Austro Hungarian Empire  the old catechisms did not contradict the Athanasius Creed. Now in 2020 the baptism of desire in the Baltimore Catechism contradicts the Athanasius Creed. At that time the baptism of desire did not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). It was EENS Feeneyite. Now the the baptism of desire contradicts EENS. For the Lefebvrists and the liberals there is EENS ( Cushingite) today.. -Lionel Andrades

The whole Church can go back to Tradition but the error of Archbishop Lefebvre and his followers is preventing it.They criticize the New Theology and yet interpret Vatican Council II with the New Theology and then they reject the conclusion and wrongly blame the Council. The liberals justify their use of the false premise since even the traditionalists, who generally oppose them, are doing the same thing. Without the New Theology there would no be the liberal-traditionalist division. Since the liberals would not be able to quote Cushingite passages in Vatican Council II and then pretend that they are exceptions to the Feeneyite ones, and the rest of Tradition.

 The whole Church can go back to Tradition but the error of Archbishop Lefebvre and his followers is preventing it.They criticize the New Theology and yet interpret Vatican Council II with the New Theology and then they reject the conclusion and wrongly blame the Council.

The liberals justify their use of the false premise since even the traditionalists, who generally oppose them, are doing the same thing.

Without the New Theology there would no be the liberal-traditionalist division. Since the liberals would not be able to quote Cushingite passages in Vatican Council II and then pretend that they are exceptions to the Feeneyite ones, and the rest of Tradition.. -Lionel Andrades

The six U.S Catholic judges of the Supreme Court would agree that all the books on Vatican Council II in the public libraries are written with a false premise

 The six U.S Catholic judges of the Supreme Court would agree that all the books on Vatican Council II in the public libraries are written with a false premise. -Lionel Andrades

Women and men in immodest clothing at the beach was not the culture of Europe 150 years back. Immodesty in clothes was a mortal sin.Chastity, modesty and purity were virtues

 Women and men in immodest clothing at the beach was not the culture of Europe 150 years back. Immodesty in clothes was a mortal sin.Chastity, modesty and purity were virtues.. -Lionel Andrades

When someone says that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church point out that Vatican Council II does not say there is known salvation outside the Church but refers to hypothetical cases, speculative cases. This is an important point to clarify. Since without this common and official error there is no liberalism in the Catholic Church based upon theology and doctrine

 When someone says that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church point out that Vatican Council II does not say there is known salvation outside the Church but refers to hypothetical cases, speculative cases. This is an important point to clarify. Since without this common and official error there is no liberalism in the Catholic Church based upon theology and doctrine. . -Lionel Andrades

At Vatican Council II the Council Fathers confused supernatural and practical theology.Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria made this mistake in two papers of the International Theological Commission , which has lost its credibility

 At Vatican Council II the Council Fathers confused supernatural and practical theology.Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria made this mistake in two papers of the International Theological Commission , which has lost its credibility.. -Lionel Andrades

Michael Matt wants to unite the clans with Cushingite theology with which he is already united with the liberals.They all use a false premise to create a New Theology and then use it to interpret Vatican Council II. Then the criticize the New Theology not knowing how it is formed and how they are using it to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition

 Michael Matt wants to unite the clans with Cushingite theology with which he is already united with the liberals.They all use a false premise to create a New Theology and then use it to interpret Vatican Council II. Then the criticize the New Theology not knowing how it is formed and how they are using it to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

When Pope Benedict asks what is the point of Mision when Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church this is propaganda.Vatican Council II does not say this. It has to be implied wrongly.A false premise has to be used.LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, etc are hypothetical only. They are not objective cases in 2020

 When Pope Benedict asks what is the point of Mision when Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church this is propaganda.Vatican Council II does not say this. It has to be implied wrongly.A false premise has to be used.LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, etc are hypothetical only. They are not objective cases in 2020. -Lionel Andrades