Thursday, November 16, 2017

Don Minutella and the Pope Francis Regime ~ HD

Facing Excommunication: Italian Novus Ordo Priest critical of Francis to be slapped with harshest possible Penalty



His name is Alessandro Minutella. He is a 44-year-old Novus Ordo priest in Italy and has publicly criticized the man he belives to be the Pope of the Catholic Church, Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”) — basically for being too “progressive”. He went so far as to call Francis a “false prophet” at the top of the “mystical body of the antichrist”.
In late March of this year, Minutella had made an open appeal to Francis from the pulpit (video here) regarding the confusion caused by Amoris Laetitia. When “Don” Minutella called for a conference of “Catholic resistance”, his “Archbishop”, Mr. Corrado Lorefice, stepped in and removed him from his post as pastor of St. John Bosco church in Palermo, Sicily. The pseudo-bishop also forbade him from speaking against the “Catholic” hierarchy in any way, and threatened him with suspension. Minutella obeyed, called off the conference, and remained mostly silent. Although he was not suspended, he was still removed as pastor, which did not take place until June, however. By that time, the Vatican was aware of the situation.
To make a long story short: Yesterday, Nov. 9, it was revealed on the Facebook page of Minutella’s Radio Domina Nostra (“Our Lady’s Radio”) that the Vatican had released a decree ordering him to make a public profession of loyalty to Francis within 48 hours, else he would be excommunicated (the text of the decree was reportedly read to him by “Abp.” Lorefice). The text of the Facebook post reads verbatim:
Continued
https://novusordowatch.org/2017/11/italian-priest-alessandro-minutella-to-be-excommunicated/

Repost :Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus


The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary,St.Benedict Center, Still River which last month was given granted canonical status negate the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II interpreted with the premise.1

The communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA are denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was interpreted over the centuries.When they interpret Vatican Council II, with the irrational premise then the Council is a rupture with the dogam extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The St.Benedict Center, Still River, Mass.was given canonical status last month since they have accepted Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases interpreted as not being hypothetical, but concrete and known exceptions to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is expected of them by the diocese.
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney,  are not affirming Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical. It would mean that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc do not refer to known people. So they would not be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This too is an interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is a rational interpretation of the Council.
Like the bishops in Worcester, Manchester and Boston they are only viewing Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being a rupture with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.So Vatican Council II becomes a break with Tradition.
This is a negation of Feeneyite EENS.They are using the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II to make it a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.
They are interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise i.e invisible people are visible.Then the bishops use the same irrationality to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For them there are exceptions to the dogma. For them hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc are practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation by other liberals and also the traditionalists.
Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr.John Hardon and Fr. William Most also interpreted EENS with the baptism of desire etc being an exception.So they were not Feeneyites.They followed the error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.They mistook what is invisible as being visible.
Now the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are not affirming Feeneyite EENS when they accept Vatican Council II( with the premise),as if there is no choice.They are accepting Vatican Council II to compromise with their liberal bishops.They are not clarifying that they affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise, without hypothetical cases being interpreted as being non hypothetical.They need to clarify that the baptism of desire is invisible.If a person is saved with the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water, it cannot be a visible exception to Feeneyite EENS.
They simply have to acknowedlge that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire. -Lionel Andrades

Superiors at St. Benedict Centers, Still River and Richmond, N.H do not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS

The St.Benedict Centers have simply to state the obvious. But then they will be in opposition to their liberal bishops who understand Vatican Council II like Mons.Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most, Fr.John Hardon and Ludwig Ott.The two popes are also Cushingites.
The Superiors at the St. Benedict Centers, at Still River and Richmond, N.H have been recognized by the Church and they are not affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. Instead they are allowing Vatican Council II to be seen as a rupture with Tradition and this is acceptable for the bishops in New England...

Image result for Photo of pro Vatican Council II

I do not condemn the traditionalists even though they use a false theology and an irrational philosophy. The error can be corrected.It is not something fixed and permanent error.However today this is also the false interpretation of the liberals and the Masons.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-citation-from-frleonard-feeney.html

Religious Pluralism is Evil  http://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-304.html


FRENCH CATHOLICS FORCIBLY REMOVED, ARRESTED FOR PRAYING ROSARY IN CHURCH / De jeunes catholiques réparent le sacrilège à l'église des Blancs Manteaux le 31 octobre 2017



by Anita Carey  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  November 14, 2017    


Men offered prayer of reparation for ecumenical service led by female Protestant "priest"

French Catholics Forcibly Removed, Arrested for Praying Rosary in Church
PARIS (ChurchMilitant.com) - Faithful Catholics were forcibly removed and arrested for praying the Rosary in a Catholic church in Paris.
In response to an ecumenical service held in the Parish of Our Lady of White Mantles commemorating the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther's posting his 95 theses, where a female Protestant pastor dressed in clerics offered a talk, about a dozen young Catholic men made reparation for what they deemed a sacrilege by praying French and Latin prayers and hymns during the service. After jeers from Catholics and Protestants in attendance, the men were arrested, some carried out of the church. 
Caroline Bretones, the "pastor" of the United Protestant Church of the Marais, was invited to speak in the Catholic parish, dressed in clerics and appearing as a female "priest." 
Medias-Presse-Info, a French speaking site, posted the video, noting, "The madness being without limit, these young Catholics were evacuated manu militari [with military aid] by the police for having prayed the Rosary in a Catholic church!"
"Young Catholics have expressed their opposition to seeing Protestantism, fought and condemned by the popes and the Council of Trent for centuries, to infiltrate the Catholic Church today," the article continues. 
While the organist tried to drown out the men's voices, it was clear many of those in attendance were angered by the men's presence. Some argued with the men and harassed them, one lady even smacking one of them in the face with a piece of paper. They continued kneeling in prayer until police arrived and forcibly removed them. 
While much of what is being said is unintelligible owing to the the loud organ music, you can hear them singing Christus Vincit, "Christ Victorious," when police remove them from the church.
Continued
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/french-catholics-arrested-for-reparation-prayers-during-ecumenical-service




Brother Peter Dimond in his book does not mention that invisible cases of the baptism of desire cannot be a visible exception to EENS.



Brother Peter Dimond osb says that in the past the Church never made an exception to the dogmatic definitions of outside the Church there is no salvation. I agree with him. It is only when sedevacantists  wrongly infer that physically invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) and the baptism of blood(BOB) are visible, that it is concluded that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). This is a mistake made by the sedevacantists and traditionalists. This is the common interpretation of the liberal theologians.
Brother Peter Dimond himself is part of this confusion. For example when he quotes Fr. Denis Fahey in the video he does not state that the priest could be referring to a hypothetical case known only to God. He is not referring to a defacto, concrete person known to be saved outside the Church. So in this way Fr. Fahey would not be contradicting the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
(2:12) When Bishop Robert Mckenna supports Fr.Fahey he could mean that hypothetical cases are not practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.
So when Fr.Fahey recognises the baptism of desire he is referring to a hypothetical and theoretical case for us human beings. Being invisible in our reality, the baptism of desire was never ever an exception to the dogma EENS.This is not said by Brother Peter Dimond.
Outside The Church There Is No SalvationImage result for Photo Brother Peter Dimond osb
The book by Brother Peter Dimond does not cover this point i.e invisible for us baptism of desire cannot be a visible exception to EENS.
(3:30)Bishop Sanborn like other sedevacantists needs to make it clear that there are no known people saved outside the Church.The emphasis is on known and unknown.
When there are no known people saved outside the Church there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Bishop Dolan and Fr.Anthony Cekada criticize Feeneyism since they assume there are known cases of the baptism of desire which are exceptions. Fr. Cekada has posted a long list of baptism of desire references from the saints. None of those saints have stated that there are known cases of the baptism of desire and so the baptism of desire is an explicit exception to Feeneyite EENS. This is the wrong inference of bishops Sanborn, Dolan and Fr. Cekada.
Members of other religions cannot be saved.They need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.The ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.It is not BOD, BOB and I.I.Defacto they all need to convert for salvation. De jure( in theory) we could speculate and hope that there are non Catholics saved in their religion. When they are in Heaven they would be Catholic.They would be made Catholic in a way known to God. Since in Heaven there are only Catholics.
However if a non Catholic is saved with the baptism of desire, with or without the baptism  of water,or in a manner known only to God, it would still be an invisible and unknown case on earth. So it cannot be an exception to the dogmatic teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
There is no known exceptional or extraordinary means of salvation for us human beings. If there was such a case it would only be known to God.So Fr. Jean Marie Gleize of the SSPX makes this mistake when he refers to the baptism of desire etc with reference to EENS in a book he has written on Vatican Council II.He does not affirm Feeneyite EENS since for him possibilities and speculations are known exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church in the present times for salvation.
'Hell is the eternal destiny of all non Catholics' who have died outside the Church according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14).Since they have died without faith and baptism, which is needed for salvation.
(7:41) Bishop Pirvanus of the CMRI also mistakes the baptism of desire as referring to visible people saved outside the Church.He mixes up  what is unknown as being known, what is hypothetical only ,as being objective.-Lionel Andrades

Automatically excommunicated archbishop of Palermo threathens to excommunicate priest


Image result for Photo of Archbishop of Palermo on a cycle in church

Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo has threathened a priest of his diocese, Fr.Alessandro Minutella with excommunication unless he expresses his fidelity to Pope Franics.
The Archbishop of Palermo  does not affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise. He does not choose to interpret the Council with Feeneyism as a theology instead of Cushingism.This is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.He is automatically excommunicated like the two popes.
The Archbishop interprets the  Nicene Creed with the same irrational premise.This is first class heresy.
The Archbishop who once rode a cycle within the church interprets magisterial documents with the baptism of desire referring to visible, instead of invisible cases, and this is approved by Pope Francis.
The Marian priest, who has been citing Our Lady's messages including that of La Salette, Tre Fontane and Anguera, Brazil has  refused to make a public statement of fidelity to Pope Francis on social media.He said  "I will not  make this  hypocritical act.It would not be obedience but subordination and superstition".
He has posted a video on Radio Domina it is reported in which he has refused to make a public act of fidelity to the pope.He has been critical of 'the false Church' within the Catholic Church.
The former Parish Priest of Romagnolo,Palermo, says the pope is responsible for the confusion over the Eucharist being given to the divorced who are remarried.

It may be mentioned that Pope Francis has approved the excommunication of a lay Catholic scholar in Columbia.During his visit to Columbia he did not ask for the excommunication of the Prof.Hose Galat to be lifted.Galat 88  former rector of the La Gran Colombia University and founder and owner of the television station Teleamiga, has been declared excommunicated for not being obedient to Pope Francis.The vague charge is now also being applied to Fr.Alessandro Minutella.-Lionel Andrades







Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism
Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism

___________________________________________________

Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism

Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism

Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism

Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism

________________________________________________

Image result for Photo of Cushingism


Image result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of CushingismImage result for Photo of Cushingism


Repost : No denial from SSPX : Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2017

No denial from SSPX : Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei

No denial. They all agree with me. The SSPX knows that LG 16 etc cannot be an exception to Feeneyite EENS. They made a mistake for the last 50 years and more.

NOVEMBER 8, 2017

Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/books-of-archbishop-lefebvre-are.html

-Lionel Andrades


 NOVEMBER 11, 2017


SSPX continues to calumniate Fr. Leonard Feeney : doctrinal ignorance prevents them from using Catholic churches on Sunday

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/sspx-continues-to-calumniate-fr-leonard.html