TE DEUM - Inno classico gregoriano

The most Life Changing Prayer for me!

Vatican Council II text is being ‘cleaned up’ on the Interrnet

 

Vatican Council II text is being ‘cleaned up’

The text of Vatican Council II, Nostra Aetate has been ‘cleaned up’ by the right people, or rather, the ‘left-people’. Controversial lines are being removed. It is the same Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul II.

In the original text of Nostra Aetate it was stated that the Church was the new people of God. This sentence has been removed.

The Catholic Church is a continuation of the Jewish religion and Catholics are the new people of God, the new Chosen People, the elect. They have the promised the Jewish Messiah promised by the Jewish prophets.

Sometime back, I checked Dominus Iesus, in English on the Internet. I could not find the line which said other religions have superstition, deficiencies and error.

I still remember that line since I quoted it often on my blog. It was the same with Nostra Aetate 4.

There are people who read this blog!

- Lionel Andrades

 FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Even the Muslims in the parish of Sant Agapito now interpret Vatican Council II rationally with the same conclusion

 
Every priest, catechist, altar server, choir member, scouts and lay person in the parish of Sant Agapito, Rome , when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, are saying that all Muslims ( and other non Catholics) are oriented to Hell without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7) and there are no known exceptions. This is the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church on Vatican Council II. It indicates that the prophet Mohammad is lost for all eternity. This is the conclusion in this parish near Termini, Roma, where the parish priest Fr. Paolo Boumis interprets LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being invisible and hypothetical cases in 2024.This is also how the Muslims and Jews who frequent the parish interpret the Council. It is common sense for all in the parish.

Catholics and non Catholics in this parish are saying outside the Church there is no salvation according to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

According to Nostra Aetate 4, 'the Church is the new people of God', the Jews are the old people of God. They are no more the Chosen People. They have rejected the Messiah. Catholics are the Elect according to Nostra Aetate 4. In Heaven there are only Catholics. They are there with 'faith and baptism'. Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation is the message of Vatican Council II. Jews do not have faith and baptism and so are oriented to Hell unless they formally convert into the Catholic Church. This is the teaching of Vatican Council II which was not mentioned at the inter faith gathering commemorating Nostra Aetate and ignoring Ad Gentes.

Nostra Aetate does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) in the following  passage.

 The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. Indeed, she proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.(4)- Nostra Aetate

Nostra Aetate recognizes the good things in other religions. The following passage also does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14. LG 14 is cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church there is no salvation.

3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting. – Nostra Aetate

The following passage also  not contradict Vatican Council II saying there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is a continuation of the Jewish religion.

. As the sacred synod searches into the mystery of the Church, it remembers the bond that spiritually ties the people of the New Covenant to Abraham's stock.

Thus the Church of Christ acknowledges that, according to God's saving design, the beginnings of her faith and her election are found already among the Patriarchs, Moses and the prophets. She professes that all who believe in Christ-Abraham's sons according to faith (6)-are included in the same Patriarch's call, and likewise that the salvation of the Church is mysteriously foreshadowed by the chosen people's exodus from the land of bondage. The Church, therefore, cannot forget that she received the revelation of the Old Testament through the people with whom God in His inexpressible mercy concluded the Ancient Covenant. Nor can she forget that she draws sustenance from the root of that well-cultivated olive tree onto which have been grafted the wild shoots, the Gentiles.(7) Indeed, the Church believes that by His cross Christ, Our Peace, reconciled Jews and Gentiles. making both one in Himself.(8)

The Church keeps ever in mind the words of the Apostle about his kinsmen: "theirs is the sonship and the glory and the covenants and the law and the worship and the promises; theirs are the fathers and from them is the Christ according to the flesh" (Rom. 9:4-5), the Son of the Virgin Mary. She also recalls that the Apostles, the Church's main-stay and pillars, as well as most of the early disciples who proclaimed Christ's Gospel to the world, sprang from the Jewish people.- Nostra Aetate

Nostra Aetate also does not have any exceptions for the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q).

So when I say outside the Church there is no salvation I am following the whole parish when they interpret Vatican Council II and other Church documents rationally.

All the Catholic religious communities in the parish and diocese, would be saying according to Vatican Council II that Islamism, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism etc are not paths to salvation. Since according to Vatican Council II there is salvation in only the Catholic Church (Ad Gentes 7) and this is the norm for salvation which is not contradicted by any passage in  the  Council .

Other religions are not paths to salvation since their members die without Catholic faith and the baptism of water ( AG 7, LG 14).Membership in the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation ( AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).

Even Muslims in the parish of Sant Agapito, who frequent the church, will reach the same conclusion, when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally

The Catholic Church is saying today that outside the Church there is no salvation. This is not only a personal opinion, only, of mine.

Muslims and Catholics at Sant Agapito do not deny that LG 8,14,1,5,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to only hypothetical cases. They do not refer to known people, seen in the flesh, who are saved outside the Church in 1965-2024.  - Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

You can’t be a good Catholic and interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. You can’t intentionally interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. You cannot choose to project invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3 etc as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2024 and then say Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition when we interpret invisible cases as just being invisible. This is a great discovery. Outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/you-cant-be-good-catholic-and-interpret.html

JANUARY 19, 2016

Fr.Hoffman's political document is false : nowhere does Nostra Aetate say that Jews do not need to convert or that the Jews are still the Chosen People.

When asked to explain the theological basis for the rejection of supersession, Fr.Hoffman says it is in Nostra Aetate. He cannot cite any text. He then says the roots are there and it has to be developed!

 

Fr.Norbet Hoffman, Secretary for the Vatican's Commission for Relations with the Jews in the video says the recent Vatican Document (“The Gifts and Calling of God Are Irrevocable”) is explicitly a theological document for further theological discussion and it is an official document of the Commission.

(2:12).Since Nostra Aetate it was clear that the Catholic Church did not have any intentions to convert Jews he says .The document is the first time it has been said in public.

Note : There is no text in Nostra Aetate which said that Jews do not need to covert.Nothing.It is the Jewish Left which has demanded that the Church interpret Nostra Aetate as saying there will be no more conversion of the Jews.This has been accepted by pro-Jewish Left Archbishops and cardinals like Sean O'Malley of Boston.

The text of Nostra Aetate does not state that Jews do not need to convert.Fr.Hoffman is making a political- left statement within the Catholic Church  and claims this is theology.

No Catholic cardinal or bishop is opposing this in public.

No one is saying that Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 indicate 'all' Jews and other non Catholics need 'faith and baptism' of salvation. Jews are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church, according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).

No cardinal is correcting Fr.Hofmman and the document and citing Nostra Aetate 4 . NA 4 says Catholics  'the new people of God' , they are the Elect.Yet there is no mention of this in the Vatican document imposed upon the Church by the Zionists.

 Nostra Aetate 4 indicates that the Catholic Church is the continuation of the Jewish Religion.Instead the document denies the content of Nostra Aetate 4,Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14.

This political document rejects NA 4, AG 7 and LG 14.

When asked to explain the theological basis for the rejection of 'supersession', a Jewsih Left term, Fr.Hoffman says 'it is in Nostra Aetate'. He cannot cite any text. He then says  a small plant is there and it has to be developed!

-Lionel Andrades
Video : https://youtu.be/AMVtF2O65fw

Church changes traditional de fide doctrine : Interview with Fr Norbert Hofmann SDB - NCRegister
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/interview-with-fr-norbert-hofmann-sdb.html

______________________________________________

October 30, 2015 

Nostra Aetate meeting does not say Vatican Council II really calls on Jews to convert http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/nostra-aetate-meeting-does-not-say.html

Nostra Aetate does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus : doctrinal opening for the SSPXhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/nostra-aetate-does-not-contradict-extra.html
May 7, 2014

Nostra Aetate does not say that Non Catholics do not need to convert into the Catholoic Church - Fr.John Hunwickehttp://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.it/2014/01/nostra-aetate-1.html 

Nostra Aetate does not state there are defacto, known cases saved in other religionshttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/nostra-aetate-does-not-state-there-are.html#links

BOSTON ARCHDIOCESE WEBSITE SAYS NOSTRA AETATE DISMISSES CHURCH INTEREST IN BAPTIZING JEWS AND AFFIRMS GOD’S COVENANT WITH THEM : NOWHERE DOES VATICAN COUNCIL II MAKE THIS CLAIM 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/12/boston-archdiocese-website-says-nostra.html#links

FALSE PROPAGANDA ON NOSTRA AETATE LACKS SENSITIVITY TOWARDS CATHOLICS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2009/12/lse-propa-ganda-on-nostra-aetate-lacks.html#links

  

http://vimeo.com/43618121#t=0

 

http://www.bristol.ac.uk/religion/people/

Video

http://www.bristol.ac.uk/religion/about/

http://www.cbcew.org.uk/CBCEW-Home/Departments/Dialogue-and-Unity/Other-Religions

 

May 5, 2014

Two weeks and no clarification from the University of Bristol administration :objective error and factually incorrect information about the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/two-weeks-and-no-clarification-from.html#links

 

University of Bristol is making the same factual error on Nostra Aetate as Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits in Boston

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/university-of-bristol-is-making-same.html#links

Fr.James Martin S.J does not say the popes, the Bible and Jesus were anti-Semitic  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/fr.html

 

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commissions.html#links

Monday, March 26, 2012
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commission.html#links

VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/vaticans-international-theological.html#links

 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/even-muslims-in-parish-of-sant-agapito.html

Wikipedia propaganda

 

MAY 20, 2023

Wikipedia's entry on Feeneyism is irrational and political. It is not Catholic. Neither is it ethical.It is supported by the popes and the CDF

 

MAY 19, 2023

Wikipedia's entry on Feeneyism is irrational and political. It is not Catholic. Neither is it ethical.

 Wikipedia’s entry on Feneeyism is false. Feeneyites do not reject the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. They instead interpret them as being hypothetical cases only. This is something obvious. They reject the baptism of desire etc as being an exception for extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Thoeretical cases of the  baptism of desire are not objective exceptions, or relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). They do not exist in our reality.

 Fr. Leonard Feeney interpreted EENS with no exceptions and so did the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which defined EENS. These two Councils were ‘Feeneyite’.

Also for Feeneyites, Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors or the dogma EENS. Since LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer always, to only hypothetical cases.This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.It is not confusing, what is invisible as being physically visible and then making false inferences.This is what Wikipedia does . If someone is saved outside the Catholic Church it can only be known to God. The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14 etc).- Lionel Andrades

JUNE 13, 2017

Wikipedia is misleading on Catholic theology

Wikipedia is misleading on 'Salvation outside the church'. It interprets the subject with Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism.

Salvation outside the church-Catholic Theology- WIKIPEDIA

Main article: Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus

The Catholic Church teaches that it is the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church founded by Jesus. Concerning non-Catholics, the Catechism of the Catholic Church has this to say:

"'Outside the Church there is no salvation'

Reformulated positively, this statement means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

Lionel: This is a Cushingite line in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 846). So when reading it a discerning Catholic has to note that even though all salvation theoretically comes from Christ through the Church which is his Body, every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation(Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441).Concretely every one needs to enter the Church to avoid Hell. 'All' need 'faith and baptism' for 'salvation' (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).So CCC 846 here does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. Neither does it contradict the understanding of EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Centers of his time, in Boston.This would be a Feeneyite way of reading this passage.

Here Wikipedia like Cardinal Ratzinger assumes invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS. This is an error.It is also the irrational theology of Cushingism.

______________________________ 

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Lionel:Yes it is not aimed at those who through no fault of their own, who do not know Christ and his Church and are saved. They are not known to us in particular cases. So they are irrelevant to the dogma EENS. They are not exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation in 2017.

Wikpedia, the liberals,traditionalists and Cardinal Ratzinger assumed there were known cases of people in invincible ignorance who were saved.This was also the error at the time of Vatican Council II. They made a philosophical mistake. Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS.

So this passage can be read in two ways.Invisible cases are invisible or they are invisible? This must be asked. Since this decides the interpretation of CCC 846.

________________________________________________

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience – those too may achieve eternal salvation.

Lionel: Is this a reference to invisible or physically visible cases in 2017? So they obviously are not relevant to the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.

________________________________________________ 

'Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men.'"^[149]

Lionel: Since invisible cases are not exceptions to the dogma teaching on all needing to be members of the Church, there is a need to evangelize with a different doctrine, then the present Cushingite one.In the present times all non Catholics with no known exceptions are oriented to Hell, without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.So we conduct mission knowing this.This was how the saints too were missionary.They held the traditional teaching on all needing to enter the Church with no exceptions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_theology

_____________________

SUBSISTENCE- ECCLESIOLOGY-WIKIPEDIA

SUBSISTENCE IS THE DOCTRINE THAT THE CHURCH OF CHRIST "SUBSISTS IN" THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THE DOCTRINE IS IN CONTINUITY WITH THE PREVIOUS PHRASING OF MYSTICI CORPORIS CHRISTI THAT THE CHURCH OF CHRIST "IS" (EST) THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, ALTHOUGH SOME THEOLOGIANS HAVE INTERPRETED THE PHRASE TO BE A RUPTURE WITH THE PREVIOUS TRADITION.

Subsistit in is a term taken from Lumen Gentium paragraph 8:

This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him, although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure.

Lionel: The many elements of sanctification and grace mentioned in Lumen Gentium 8 again comes from Cushingism. These are 'zero cases'. We do not know of any person who will be saved or has been saved outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'.

_____________________________

The proper interpretation of subsistence has been controversial since the Second Vatican Council introduced the phrase; the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has issued various interpretations confirmed by the pope, while some dissident theologians put forth more radical interpretations.

Lionel: It is only controversial if you assume there is known salvation outside the Church. There is noknown salvation outside the Church.

So again when reading Vatican Council II or the Catechism(1994) we have to keep in mind that invisible cases are not visible, they are invisible. I call this approach Feeneyism.

Wikipedia's approach is Cushingite. Invisible cases are visible. So these visible cases of the baptiism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the old ecclesiology and so now a new theology.A new ecclesiology has been created upon which depends the new ecumenism.

When I refer to Feeneyism it should not be confused with Wikipedia's explanation of Feeneyism. For me Wikpedia's Feeneyism is really Cushingism.It is a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known for example in the 16th century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_ecclesiology

________________________________________________

FEENEYISM-WIKIPEDIA

Wikipedia says:

Feeneyism is the doctrinal position associated with Leonard Feeney (1897–1978), a Jesuit priest and founder of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, who advocated a strict interpretation of the doctrine extra Ecclesiam nulla salus ("outside the Church there is no salvation").

Lionel: Yes there can only the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.So there are no exceptions to the 'strict interpretation' of EENS.

Fr. Feeney was a Roman Catholic priest and a member of the Jesuits. The Jesuit order dismissed Fr. Feeney in 1949 on account of disobedience, and on 4 February 1953, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (known then as The Holy Office) declared him excommunicated "on account of grave disobedience to Church Authority, being unmoved by repeated warnings".^[1] He was reconciled to the Church in 1972.^[2] Fr. Feeney co-founded the group known as the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeneyism

Lionel: The Jesuits dismissed him since for them invisible cases were visible. It was the same for the cardinals at the Holy Office in 1949. Now we realize that it was the magisterium which had made an objective mistake and not Fr. Leonard Feeney.He was not saying invisible cases are visible.
________________________


FR.LEONARD FEENEY -WIKIPEDIA

Father Leonard Edward Feeney (February 18, 1897 – January 30, 1978)^[1] was a U.S. Jesuit priest, poet, lyricist, and essayist.

He articulated and defended a strict interpretation of the Roman Catholic doctrine, extra Ecclesiam nulla salus ("outside the Church there is no salvation"). He took the position that baptism of blood and baptism of desire are unavailing and that therefore no non-Catholics will be saved.

Lionel: 'He took the position that baptism of blood and desire  are unavailing' since there are no such cases in our reality, they are unknown cases. We cannot give any one the baptism of desire like we can administer the baptism of water.No one in the past could have seen someone in Heaven saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.But for the liberals the baptism of desire was an exception to the dogma EENS.It was an example of known salvation outside the Church. This was their false premise and conclusion.

This is what lay Catholics have been taught about Catholic theology through Wikipedia and the magisterium instead of correcting Wikipedia supports the deception.--Lionel Andrades 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Feeney

_____________________________________________________

JULY 5, 2016

The ordinary magisterium has replaced the traditional Feeneyite theology with irrational and non traditional Cushingite theology :Wikipedia's errors on EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/the-ordinary-magisterium-has-replaced.html

AUGUST 3, 2015

Wikipedia and Most Holy Trinity,Florida sedevacantist seminary make the sameerror  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/wikipedia-and-most-holy-trinity-usa.html

Wikipedia implies that the baptism of desire and blood are explicit so are exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/wikipedia-implies-that-baptism-of.html

If Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS where is the doctrinal basis for Bishop Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada's sedevacantism?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/if-vatican-council-ii-does-not.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2012

WIKIPEDIA SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II CONTRADICTS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND THE SSPX AND THE VATICAN DO NOT PROTEST

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/wikipedia-says-vatican-council-ii.html

NOVEMBER 16, 2012 

CATHOLIC TRADITIONALISTS DO NOT CHALLENGE THE ERRORS ON WIKIPEDIA SINCE THEY ASSUME VATICAN COUNCIL II CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS 

HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.IT/2012/11/CATHOLIC-TRADITIONALISTS-DO-NOT.HTML

JULY 11, 2012

FEENEYISM IS IN ACCORD WITH MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/feeneyism-is-in-accord-with-magisterial.html

JULY 11, 2012

WIKIPEDIA TELLS CATHOLICS WHAT IS HERESY FOR THEM AND THE VATICAN NOR THE SSPX ISSUES A CORRECTION

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/wikipedia-tells-catholics-what-is.html

JULY 10, 2012

Fr.Leonard Feeney, Wikipedia and Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/frleonard-feeney-wikipedia-and-vatican.html

SEPTEMBER 24, 2011

APPEAL TO CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, VATICAN: IT’S TIME TO CLARIFY THE BOSTON HERESY OF RICHARD CUSHING

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/09/appeal-to-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html

_________________________________________________-

AUGUST 11, 2011

SECULAR CATECHESIS FOR CATHOLICS : NO ONE OBJECTS IN THE MEDIAhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/08/secular-catechesis-for-catholics-no-one.html

JANUARY 31, 2011

THREE COMMON SENSE POINTS TO USE AGAINST PROPAGANDA AGAINST THE CHURCH - WIKIPEDIA AND FR.WILLIAM MOSThttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/01/three-common-sense-points-to-use.html

 

APRIL 23, 2010

THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION BETWEEN LUMEN GENTIUM VATICAN COUNCIL II AND FEENEYISM AS WIKIPEDIA ALLEGES

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2010/04/there-is-no-contradiction-between-lumen.html

OCTOBER 1, 2009

WIKIPEDIA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ENTRY FULL OF CONFUSION

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2009/10/wikipedia-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_Ecclesiam_nulla_salus

___________________________

AUGUST 3, 2015

Wikipedia and Most Holy Trinity,Florida sedevacantist seminary make the same error  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/wikipedia-and-most-holy-trinity-usa.html

Wikipedia implies that the baptism of desire and blood are explicit so are exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/wikipedia-implies-that-baptism-of.html

______________________________

SEPTEMBER 24, 2011

APPEAL TO CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, VATICAN: IT’S TIME TO CLARIFY THE BOSTON HERESY OF RICHARD CUSHING

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/09/appeal-to-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html

_________________________________________________-

AUGUST 11, 2011

SECULAR CATECHESIS FOR CATHOLICS : NO ONE OBJECTS IN THE MEDIAhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/08/secular-catechesis-for-catholics-no-one.html

JANUARY 31, 2011

THREE COMMON SENSE POINTS TO USE AGAINST PROPAGANDA AGAINST THE CHURCH - WIKIPEDIA AND FR.WILLIAM MOSThttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/01/three-common-sense-points-to-use.html

 

APRIL 23, 2010

THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION BETWEEN LUMEN GENTIUM VATICAN COUNCIL II AND FEENEYISM AS WIKIPEDIA ALLEGES

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2010/04/there-is-no-contradiction-between-lumen.html

OCTOBER 1, 2009

WIKIPEDIA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ENTRY FULL OF CONFUSION

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2009/10/wikipedia-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_Ecclesiam_nulla_salus

__________________________________________________